Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT One vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 9.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT One
Read 93 OpenText UFT One reviews
  • 8,465 Views
  • 5,308 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Oracle Application Testing ...
Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews
  • 1,217 Views
  • 729 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Oracle Application Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
OpenText customer service is praised for responsiveness, though experiences vary, with mixed satisfaction levels and reliance on partners for support.
No sentiment score available
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Application Testing Suite report
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
OpenText UFT One needs better object identification, browser compatibility, AI, integration, and interface, with concerns on cost and stability.
No sentiment score available
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Application Testing Suite report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
OpenText UFT One offers scalability and flexibility, though users note speed and browser issues; licensing affects usage costs.
No sentiment score available
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Application Testing Suite report
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
OpenText UFT One is praised for robust automation but criticized for high costs and complex licensing options.
No sentiment score available
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Application Testing Suite report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
OpenText UFT One's stability is generally reliable but varies with system requirements and can be affected by version changes.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
OpenText UFT One excels in cross-platform compatibility, versatile scripting, and efficient automation for desktop, web, and mobile testing.
No sentiment score available
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Application Testing Suite report
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)
Oracle Application Testing ...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (8th), Load Testing Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.5%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson - PeerSpot reviewer
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results
With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.
Read full review
Rishabh-Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy
Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
The solution should have additional features, but not much. It already has some sort of artificial intelligence that must be developed. It needs to be in trend. The solution needs better marketing,...
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle Application Testing Suite?
We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Application Testing Suite?
The speed of setup and deployment of this solution is based on the size and complexity of the organization implementing it. Depending on the size and complexity of the organization, this could take...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Application Testing Suite?
We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules. We would also like the customization of reports within the solution t...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 31% of the time
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One Logo
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 11% of the time
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 10% of the time
UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One Logo
UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 8% of the time
Worksoft Certify vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Worksoft Certify vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText UFT One Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite
Compared 41% of the time
Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite
Compared 9% of the time
OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Oracle Application Testing Suite
Compared 8% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Katalon Studio vs Oracle Application Testing Suite
Compared 5% of the time
Eggplant Test vs Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Eggplant Test vs Oracle Application Testing Suite
Compared 5% of the time
More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One
November 2024
OpenText UFT One reportDownload OpenText UFT One product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Application Testing Suite
November 2024
Oracle Application Testing Suite reportDownload Oracle Application Testing Suite product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
OATS
 

Learn More

OpenText
Oracle
 

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper
Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.
 

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite
November 2024
Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT One vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.