OpenText UFT One vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

"The entire framework is very useful. It's easily integrable with Excel."

"Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge."

"We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution."

"The inside object repository is nice. We can use that and learn it through the ALM connection. That's a good feature. The reporting and smart identification features are also excellent."

"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."

"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."

"Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test."

"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"The solution is scalable."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."

"I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications."

"The product should evolve to be flexible so one can use any programming language such as Java and C#, and not just VB script."

"The speed could be improved because a large test suite takes some time to execute."

"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."

"The solution is expensive."

"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."

"I would like Micro Focus to provide more information on their portal about their newer products. The information about UFT One was outdated. The image recognition features could also be better."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"The price is reasonable."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"It's an expensive solution."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."