Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Picus Security comparison

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Read 6 Picus Security reviews

2,299 Views
2,092 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Picus Security both operate in the network security space. Guardicore holds an advantage with its strong backward compatibility and rapid implementation capabilities, while Picus Security excels in threat intelligence and integration with other tools.

Features: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation offers micro-segmentation, high process visibility, and AI-powered security policy implementations. Its backward compatibility with legacy systems is significant. Picus Security provides robust threat intelligence, real-world attack simulations, and strong security control validation. It integrates well with other security tools, making it a comprehensive solution for identifying and preventing threats.

Room for Improvement: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation could improve by lowering licensing costs and enhancing integration with major firewall vendors. Flexible policy management and user-level control, especially regarding diverse environments like Kubernetes, are also desired. Picus Security needs to improve its precision in attack identification and offer better automatic patching capabilities via AI. Enhancements in scalability and tool integration would bolster its market competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is flexible, supporting both on-premises and cloud environments, and is praised for its responsive customer support. Picus Security supports hybrid and on-premises environments but lacks notable customer service satisfaction levels and could enhance its technical support offerings.

Pricing and ROI: While Guardicore is priced higher, the investment is justified by its ROI through improved security compliance and reduced need for additional resources. Picus Security offers good value for money with its affordable pricing but hasn't significantly realized ROI in new markets. Both solutions encourage evaluators to consider cost against features and deployment needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Picus Security Report (Updated: September 2025).

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Picus Security

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,623 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud and Data Center Security (1st), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (12th), Microsegmentation Software (3rd)

Picus Security

Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Picus Security is 17.2%, down from 18.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Picus Security	17.2%
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation	0.8%
Other	82.0%

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

Featured Reviews

Uday Varma

Solution Architecht at Inspira Enterprise

Offers granular control and ease of policy creation with features like telemetry and micro-segmentation but incident tagging is missing

Our customers use the solution for micro-segmentation within the data center or cloud environments. One customer uses it for their on-premises infrastructure, deployed at the code level across their massive network. Another customer uses it in a data center to monitor microsegmentation for their 500-node workload. Moreover, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation has helped our customers manage and secure traffic between different applications or workloads. Earlier, they were using VMware NSX-v, which offered good logging for distributed services on an analytical level. However, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation provides them with better overall visibility and granular control over-segmentation, even for inter-application and inter-routing traffic.

Read full review

AkashDeshpandey

Cyber Security Consultant at GBS IT Services

Simulate attacks to test and validate security controls effectively

I can simulate an attack into a live environment and test whether my controls are working properly. It checks if the controls can stop and mitigate the attacks One valuable feature of Picus Security is security control validation. It provides good reports and offers signature-based solutions. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Guardicore makes its own rule set automatically, so we can work fast when creating a rule set."

"This tool greatly helps in understanding the footprint of the attacks."

"From day one, you get threat intelligence. It will immediately block active threats, which has been useful."

"The tool is a complete package that offers many features like visibility. You can get a graph with real-time workflows and visibility into server-to-server communication. We get visibility into many things happening within our environment."

"The interface and dashboard are amazing."

"The most valuable feature is the visibility of processes and connections."

"I found the solution to be stable."

"We like the centralized management of the firewalls. Until we installed Guardicore Centra, we managed all our firewalls individually, so making changes was complicated, difficult, and time-consuming."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation pros

"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."

"The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs."

"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."

"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."

"It provides good reports and offers signature-based solutions."

Cons

"Clients would like to see that the security policies of GuardiCore can continue to be comparable to all the major firewall players out there."

"In our version, when using the terminal server, we cannot exclude user tasks for each session."

"Sometimes, the speed needs improvement, especially when it comes to the generation of maps, where it can be a bit slow."

"It doesn't support a PAAC solution (Platforma as a service) in the cloud."

"They can maybe improve their customer service just because they are kind of a small organization, and customer service isn't as big as others such as VMware."

"Kubernetes is not installed in the way we need it."

"Needs more customization of honeypots and a vaster catalog of systems able to be mimicked."

"Guardicore Centra should incorporate automation so that we don't require to write custom scripts and APIs. The tool also has limitations on rules where it allows only sixty thousand rules. Our clients have also commented that there are too many manual clicks and effort to do changes. I think that the incorporation of automation can help our clients make changes with confidence and without the possibility of human error."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation cons

"To improve, Picus Security could consider establishing a data center in India to address trust issues and increase interest from Indian customers."

"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."

"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."

"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."

"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."

"There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The customer would complain about the cost."

"The price is the same as other products in the market. There's no price argument to choose one or the other product, it will cost the customer approximately the same."

"Compared to the pricing we were seeing from both Illumio and Edgewise, Guardicore was very competitive."

"The pricing is too high."

"Guardicore Centra provides better value for money than NSX, was the other solution that we looked at, which was too expensive for what it does."

"GuardiCore has made some new changes to the license now. We've seen monthly and annual licenses based on a subscription. We have a few clients that pay anywhere from $25,000 a year."

"This is not a cheap solution but you have to consider the bigger picture, which is what it is giving you."

"Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is expensive."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation pricing and cost advice

"They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."

"There is a yearly license according to the number of vectors. The pricing is moderate."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Guardicore Centra?

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. I know other micro-segmentation tools like Cisco or Illumio, and so I think they are in the middle.

What do you like most about Guardicore Infection Monkey?

Initially, I liked the telemetry part. But later, we used the microsegmentation features that we were able to deploy and found that they really stood out from other vendors. It allows us to see mi...

What needs improvement with Guardicore Infection Monkey?

When we have more than one interface, we can only have one policy for both interfaces. Normally, you have assets with a production interface and a server interface that are only for management. But...

What do you like most about Picus Security?

The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Picus Security?

The pricing of Picus Security is average, and it offers a good value for money.

What needs improvement with Picus Security?

There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support. Picus Security could improve the response time.

Illumio vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Comparisons

Compared 45% of the time

VMware NSX vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Secure Workload vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 9% of the time

Zero Networks vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 3% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 3% of the time

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Competitors

Pentera vs Picus Security

Compared 31% of the time

Cymulate vs Picus Security

Compared 30% of the time

SafeBreach vs Picus Security

Compared 12% of the time

AttackIQ vs Picus Security

Compared 11% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Picus Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Picus Security Competitors

Product Reports

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

October 2025

Download Akamai Guardicore Segmentation product report

Download Picus Security product report

September 2025

Also Known As

Guardicore Centra, GuardiCore

No data available

Overview

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is a software-based microsegmentation solution that provides the simplest, fastest, and most intuitive way to enforce Zero Trust principles. It enables you to prevent malicious lateral movement in your network through precise segmentation policies, visuals of activity within your IT environment, and network security alerts. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation works across your data centers, multicloud environments, and endpoints. It is faster to deploy than infrastructure segmentation approaches and provides you with unparalleled visibility and control of your network.

Akamai

Independent from any vendor or technology, the unparalleled Picus Platform is designed to continuously measure the effectiveness of security defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments. Created by a team that’s been working together more than 10 years already and has proven their expertise in enterprise cybersecurity, Picus is trusted by many large multinational corporations and government agencies.

Sample Customers

Santander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE

Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı Kredi