Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon comparison

Software AG and BiZZdesign are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Software AG is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.0, while BiZZdesign is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1. Software AG holds a 2.3% mindshare in AM, compared to BiZZdesign’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of BiZZdesign users who would recommend it.

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Read 3 Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management reviews

865 Views
623 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Read 17 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews

2,246 Views
1,036 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management and BiZZdesign HoriZZon are enterprise architecture solutions. Alfabet leads with cost-effectiveness and customer support, while BiZZdesign HoriZZon dominates with its advanced features, offering more overall value.

Features: Alfabet offers comprehensive portfolio management, strategic planning capabilities, and efficient features for cost-sensitive environments. BiZZdesign HoriZZon focuses on collaboration with stakeholders, advanced analytics, and seamless integration, providing superior strategic insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alfabet provides a flexible deployment model and strong customer support, simplifying the deployment process. BiZZdesign HoriZZon emphasizes continuous support and user training, ensuring ongoing engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Alfabet is known for its competitive pricing, aligning well with customer budgets and showcasing impressive ROI. BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers superior ROI despite higher upfront costs, due to its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

6th

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is 2.3%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 4.3%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

AlanJackson

Partner: Enterprise Strategy & Advisory at Wipro Limited

May 5, 2023

Great taxonomy support but raw business processing should be upgraded

Alfabet is not just a technology tool, it's also a business tool. And if a decision's made without the business involved, then Alfabet will not be in a position to deliver anything more than support for enterprise architect drawings and solutions drawings. It has to be the business. If you do that, it works well. If you don't and I've had the experience where they haven't evolved a business, then it just becomes a tech tool that the business doesn't care about. The stigma of having an environment that was so delayed in the maintenance caused lots of finger-pointing within the organization of who was right and who was wrong. It took a considerable period of time to move people past that point to actually look at it as a business tool supported by the technology team. I rate the solution seven out of 10.

Read full review

Venkat Raju Mallipudi

Group Chief of Enterprise Architecture & S/W Engineering/ CTO at Aventra Group

Mar 26, 2024

Easy to implement, and it's reliable but restrictions in integration capabilities

Integration definitely needs improvement. There are some restrictions. We've seen that it doesn't integrate with everything we might expect. Out of ten products we want to integrate, maybe five or six integrate easily. The other four might face challenges due to lower investment in the products or compatibility issues. It's definitely not easy to achieve seamless integration for any product. We can only test to a certain extent, and issues could arise from either BiZZdesign HoriZZon or the other product. Another point is the cost of licenses. If they were a bit lower, it would be easier for businesses to acquire more licenses... something like an enterprise or bulk license model. Maybe different pricing tiers based on the number of licenses, like significant discounts for orders over one hundred. This could help clients adopt the product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was straightforward. It takes two to three days to set up the environment. One person was able to handle the implementation."

"The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its customizability, and flexibility in the configuration."

"The initial setup of this solution was very straightforward."

"The most valuable features are the application, portfolio, data, architectures, and modeling things."

"The tool's most valuable feature is that its collaboration part is very good."

"Among the valuable features is the ability to document standards. For example, we have mandatory operating standards that need to be followed by every application and every architecture. We use things like table charts and pie charts for documenting the costs incurred across the systems. All of these are good features."

"I like the flexibility of the modeling part for standards like ArchiMate and, at the same time, BPMN. It allows us to connect elements from different areas and to have a single repository and a single source of truth. It gives us one place to do analysis throughout the organization."

"The powerful editing function in teamwork project-based, common or shared modeling, based on a powerful repository and knowledge sharing in a portal are the most valuable features. These are the most important features for me. I can add the integration of individual modeling notations like Archimate plus BPMN and DMN, and so on. We travel from one location to another and the tool allows us to keep track."

"One of the main advantages of this solution is that they have representation in the Open Group Forum, which means that any changes in ArchiMate are immediately implemented in BiZZdesign."

"The enterprise studio where the modelling happens is valuable."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros

Cons

"The user experience, the layout and the different technologies behind the presentations are a bit old. These need to be updated. They should focus on web development. It's simply not supporting the current user experience guidelines."

"The product is not great at implementing security frameworks across an end-to-end supply chain."

"We would like to see the visualization of assets, as well as artificial intelligence techniques to assist us in making our decisions."

"We tested it, and we had support from BiZZdesign, including patches, but it just didn't do what we wanted."

"I have seen table charts where, if the chart is a little too big, it does not fit in HoriZZon and it is not at all visible... There have been several times where we could not publish a chart properly and we had to break the chart into small tables and create multiple artifacts, creating a complete mess. This should be seriously taken up by BiZZdesign because there is a lot of scope for improvement in terms of usability. It's not at all good, unfortunately."

"The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult."

"Scalability is a bit of a problem for BiZZdesign. There is always a possibility it will failover."

"It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past."

"The automatic data collection and interface need improvement."

"There's room for improvement. When I finished using it over a year ago, I discussed implementing C4 notation with BiZZdesign HoriZZon.They've likely done this now, but I haven't seen it. Setting up interactive views for stakeholders to score services was a bit difficult."

"There is room for improvement in making it more seamless between the modeling and the analysis pieces. Sometimes you have to do some work in the backend to ensure that the HoriZZon portal really gets all of the information the way you want it. They are working on the seamlessness between what they call Enterprise Studio and HoriZZon."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."

"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."

"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."

"The price is reasonable."

"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."

"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

34%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management?

The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management?

The ability for Alfabet to acknowledge use cases that are specifically business-based and not technology-based and better integrate those process designs across the spectrum could be improved. The ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management?

I work for a systems integrator and we are end users. Organizations using this product are enterprise-size, our largest customer has 30,000 users. One customer had use cases built on sourcing raw m...

See all answers

What do you like most about BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult. We don't use the chart functionality much, and I think that is quite problematic at the moment. We have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

I use the solution in my company for all sorts of things, like enterprise and solution architecture. As part of our design process, BiZZdesign HoriZZon is used for road mapping. We also use it for ...

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 38% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 14% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 9% of the time

iServer vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 9% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Competitors

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 14% of the time

ARIS BPA vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 13% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 8% of the time

Lucidchart vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 7% of the time

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

October 2024

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management report

Download Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management product report

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

November 2024

Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report

Also Known As

No data available

HoriZZon

Learn More

Software AG

Video not available

BiZZdesign

Overview

Software AG's Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Platform provides a collaborative platform for aligning the IT landscape with the business to guide competitive transformation. You can describe complex IT systems in terms of their business, application, information and technical layers, and develop standards for change. Build the foundation for business-IT transformation with an accurate, real-time picture of the IT landscape, including all applications and technologies, the inter-relationships between them, the information they exchange as well as the business organizations and processes they support.

Make smarter decisions and optimize outcomes by unifying all your strategy, capabilities, operating models and change portfolios in a single platform.

With all the data about your business in one place you can see the big picture and make properly informed strategic decisions to drive growth. Bizzdesign Horizzon brings together strategy, IT architecture, operating models, data, capabilities, change portfolios and ideas into a single, intuitive collaborative business design platform. Real-time visibility of key metrics and trends allows you to take action more quickly. Accelerating the speed and accuracy of your operations now – and into the future.

Core Platform Capabilities:

Multi-discipline collaboration
Data Integration
Advanced analytics
Models and Roadmaps
Governance & Security
Business Insight Graph

Sample Customers

Metro Bank, Credit Suisse

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

October 2024

Free Report: Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Find out what your peers are saying about Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.