Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Aurora vs SAP HANA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Migrating to Amazon Aurora cut costs by 30%, boosting performance, reliability, and customer satisfaction with operational efficiencies.
Sentiment score
6.6
SAP HANA offers varying ROI and performance improvements, but integration challenges affect its full potential in ERP transitions.
Using Amazon Aurora has saved us significantly in terms of manpower costs, with nearly fifty percent savings compared to an on-premises solution.
We do not feel we're getting value for the investment due to the additional resources needed for integration and maintenance.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.6
Subscription level dictates Amazon Aurora's support quality, with premium users receiving better service and others relying on documentation.
Sentiment score
6.3
SAP HANA customer service excels, but technical support varies, with inconsistent expertise and mixed user experiences, needing improvement.
Technical support from Amazon is rated very highly.
The support is lacking and not worth the premium price.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Amazon Aurora provides automatic, efficient scalability, benefiting various sectors with pay-as-you-go pricing, scoring high in user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.9
SAP HANA scales efficiently, supporting diverse user volumes and enterprise needs, despite increased costs, ensuring robust performance and minimal downtime.
Our operations have grown from a hundred data operations a day to as many in a couple of seconds.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon Aurora is praised for stability, high availability, and performance, with minor issues not impacting applications significantly.
Sentiment score
7.9
SAP HANA is considered stable and reliable with improvements in version 2.0, though some minor glitches were reported.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon Aurora requires cost improvements, Oracle integration, better scalability, tuning, migration, comparison tools, and enhanced performance features.
SAP HANA faces cost, usability, integration, and performance challenges, requiring better user experience, training, and support enhancements.
There are technical challenges, such as the inability to provision the database using a PostgreSQL snapshot directly.
The main issue is the ecosystem, which lacks the widespread support that SQL enjoys.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Aurora is costly compared to competitors but cost-effective for enterprises, praised for performance and pay-per-use model.
SAP HANA is seen as costly, yet valued for speed and integration, with cloud options potentially more affordable.
The pricing is reasonable and not overly expensive.
It's a recurring subscription model, which is expensive compared to legacy systems with just a maintenance fee.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Aurora provides scalable, reliable, and efficient database management with integrated AWS features, ensuring high availability and reduced maintenance.
SAP HANA excels in real-time processing, integration, and analytics, offering speed, efficiency, and robust data management for enterprises.
Amazon Aurora offers a 99.9% SLA compared to PostgreSQL. This ensures a high level of availability for our applications.
This architecture allows for faster data processing and real-time analytics that were not possible with traditional databases.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP HANA
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
84
Ranking in other categories
Data Virtualization (2nd), Embedded Database (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 3.3%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP HANA is 11.7%, up from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Rajitha Jatothu - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieve high performance with fault-tolerant and highly available database management
Aurora is a key pillar for us, offering performance and availability. It is faster than RDS and supports multi-region clusters and scalability. One feature we value is Aurora's ability to provide a reader endpoint, allowing applications to connect without tracking replicas. It supports auto-scaling and offers several options for monitoring and optimizing database performance. Aurora's fault tolerance and ability to handle multiple replicas contribute to its reliability and high performance.
Jayarami Reddy Pujeri - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive system with real-time analytics for versatile industry applications
Our primary use case is working with various clients in industries such as pharmaceuticals and other services. We support clients as implementers of SAP HANA, providing expertise in functionality, finance, logistics, and processes The solution is very user-friendly and supports all kinds of…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?
Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?
The pricing for Amazon Aurora is nearly the same as RDS, with Aurora offering additional functionalities. This makes the product cost-effective.
What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?
There are tuning challenges. The same methods used for tuning in RDS might not work in Aurora, and some functionalities available in MySQL may not be compatible with Aurora. There's also a concern ...
What are the biggest benefits of using SAP HANA?
Based on my work with SAP HANA, the biggest benefit that it can bring to your business is total data management. This product is by SAP - a company that serves almost all needs a client may have co...
Is SAP HANA’s customer and technical support reliable?
We have been using SAP HANA for a fairly short period of time and have only taken advantage of their customer support. So far, we have not had issues that required specialized help from technical s...
Is SAP HANA difficult to set up and start using?
SAP HANA is fairly easy to set up, however, I do not think a complete beginner can do it. You certainly need some preparation - either you need to have experience with similar solutions, or with ot...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel
Unilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.