Top 10 SAP HANA Alternatives

Vendor: SAP

4.1 out of 5

84 reviews
92% willing to recommend

1,181 followers

Top SAP HANA Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAP HANA based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include IBM Informix, Oracle Database In-Memory, and Progress OpenEdge RDBMS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SAP HANA surpasses its competitors by offering real-time analytics and in-memory computing capabilities that accelerate data processing, enabling businesses to make instant, data-driven decisions while providing an integrated environment for transaction and analytical workloads.

SAP Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

IBM Informix

4.3 out of 5

IBM Informix

4.3 out of 5

SAP HANA excels in real-time data processing and integration with SAP applications. In comparison, IBM Informix offers superior data compression, high availability, and handles large-scale environments efficiently. Tech buyers may choose SAP HANA for real-time analytics or IBM Informix for robust performance.

Download IBM Informix vs. SAP HANA Report

Pricing

SAP HANA has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Informix, making IBM Informix the more budget-friendly option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP HANA has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Informix, making IBM Informix the more budget-friendly option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.

Oracle Database In-Memory

4.4 out of 5

Oracle Database In-Memory

4.4 out of 5

SAP HANA offers valuable features like real-time analytics, dynamic tiering, and robust security, ideal for organizations prioritizing cost-efficiency and ROI. In comparison, Oracle Database In-Memory, with its scalability, advanced compression, and SQL compatibility, provides a comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher cost with long-term benefits.

Download Oracle Database In-Memory vs. SAP HANA Report

Pricing

SAP HANA setup is highly flexible but costly, while Oracle Database In-Memory offers a more straightforward and less expensive initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP HANA setup is highly flexible but costly, while Oracle Database In-Memory offers a more straightforward and less expensive initial setup.

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS

4.5 out of 5

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS

4.5 out of 5

A comparison between Progress OpenEdge RDBMS and SAP HANA reveals notable differences. Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is valued for affordability and ease of deployment. In comparison, SAP HANA offers advanced features and superior performance, appealing to those prioritizing robust capabilities over initial costs.

Download Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs. SAP HANA Report

Pricing

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS setup cost is significantly lower, whereas SAP HANA setup cost is higher due to its advanced features and complexity.

View comparison

Pricing

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS setup cost is significantly lower, whereas SAP HANA setup cost is higher due to its advanced features and complexity.

DuckDB

4.5 out of 5

DuckDB

4.5 out of 5

SAP HANA is favored for comprehensive support and expansive features, including real-time analytics. In comparison, DuckDB excels in efficiency and cost-effectiveness. SAP HANA's deployment and customer service are robust yet time-consuming, whereas DuckDB's setup is quick and straightforward. SAP HANA offers substantial ROI, but DuckDB is budget-friendly.

Pricing

SAP HANA has a higher initial setup cost, while DuckDB offers a more budget-friendly option with lower setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP HANA has a higher initial setup cost, while DuckDB offers a more budget-friendly option with lower setup expenses.

Related categories

Embedded Database

Relational Databases Tools

Data Virtualization