Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SAP HANA Logo

Top 10 SAP HANA Alternatives

Vendor: SAP
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
1,182 followers
Post review

Top SAP HANA Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAP HANA based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include IBM Informix, Oracle Database In-Memory, and Progress OpenEdge RDBMS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SAP Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
SAP HANA Logo
IBM Informix
4.3 out of 5
SAP HANA Logo
IBM Informix
4.3 out of 5
SAP HANA excels in real-time data processing and integration with SAP applications. In comparison, IBM Informix offers superior data compression, high availability, and handles large-scale environments efficiently. Tech buyers may choose SAP HANA for real-time analytics or IBM Informix for robust performance.
Download IBM Informix vs. SAP HANA Report
SAP HANA has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Informix, making IBM Informix the more budget-friendly option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP HANA has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Informix, making IBM Informix the more budget-friendly option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
SAP HANA Logo
SAP HANA Logo
Oracle Database In-Memory
4.4 out of 5
SAP HANA offers valuable features like real-time analytics, dynamic tiering, and robust security, ideal for organizations prioritizing cost-efficiency and ROI. In comparison, Oracle Database In-Memory, with its scalability, advanced compression, and SQL compatibility, provides a comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher cost with long-term benefits.
Download Oracle Database In-Memory vs. SAP HANA Report
SAP HANA setup is highly flexible but costly, while Oracle Database In-Memory offers a more straightforward and less expensive initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP HANA setup is highly flexible but costly, while Oracle Database In-Memory offers a more straightforward and less expensive initial setup.
SAP HANA Logo
SAP HANA Logo
Progress OpenEdge RDBMS
4.5 out of 5
A comparison between Progress OpenEdge RDBMS and SAP HANA reveals notable differences. Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is valued for affordability and ease of deployment. In comparison, SAP HANA offers advanced features and superior performance, appealing to those prioritizing robust capabilities over initial costs.
Download Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs. SAP HANA Report
Progress OpenEdge RDBMS setup cost is significantly lower, whereas SAP HANA setup cost is higher due to its advanced features and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Progress OpenEdge RDBMS setup cost is significantly lower, whereas SAP HANA setup cost is higher due to its advanced features and complexity.
SAP HANA Logo
DuckDB
4.5 out of 5
SAP HANA Logo
DuckDB
4.5 out of 5
SAP HANA is favored for comprehensive support and expansive features, including real-time analytics. In comparison, DuckDB excels in efficiency and cost-effectiveness. SAP HANA's deployment and customer service are robust yet time-consuming, whereas DuckDB's setup is quick and straightforward. SAP HANA offers substantial ROI, but DuckDB is budget-friendly.
SAP HANA has a higher initial setup cost, while DuckDB offers a more budget-friendly option with lower setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP HANA has a higher initial setup cost, while DuckDB offers a more budget-friendly option with lower setup expenses.

Related categories

Embedded Database
Relational Databases Tools
Data Virtualization