Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Google Kubernetes Engine comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Amazon ECS support is praised for responsiveness and expertise, though documentation issues and response times vary by subscription level.
Sentiment score
6.9
Google Kubernetes Engine support receives mixed reviews, with varied response times, regional differences, and experienced users often self-sufficient.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.2
Users suggest improving Amazon Elastic Container Service's pricing, usability, documentation, monitoring, support, security, and customization for better manageability.
No sentiment score available
Google Kubernetes Engine needs improved network configuration, user interface, security, support, cost efficiency, and feature enhancements for competitiveness.
Log observability could be made easier so someone from high school can use it without having technological expertise.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Amazon ECS offers robust horizontal and vertical scaling, praised for resource adjustability, auto-scaling, and integration with CloudWatch.
No sentiment score available
Google Kubernetes Engine is praised for scalability and auto-scaling, though cluster complexity is noted by some users across industries.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Amazon ECS offers flexible pricing but costs can vary greatly with usage and configuration, especially outside UAE and South Africa.
No sentiment score available
GKE offers flexible machine configurations, with varying costs based on resource use, from $90 to $3000 monthly.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Amazon ECS is highly stable, achieving up to 99.99% uptime, with minimal issues mainly related to user setups or network.
Sentiment score
8.5
Google Kubernetes Engine is praised for its stability, robust architecture, and frequent updates, despite minor issues in complex deployments.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon ECS offers scalable, cost-effective container management with AWS integration, 99% uptime, strong security, and easy-to-use features.
Sentiment score
7.5
Google Kubernetes Engine excels with seamless deployment, robust scalability, multi-cloud integration, intuitive management, and strong support for containerization.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...
Ranking in Container Management
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Containers as a Service (CaaS) (1st)
Google Kubernetes Engine
Ranking in Container Management
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 2.5%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Kubernetes Engine is 3.0%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management
 

Featured Reviews

Salvador Fernández - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to maintain a global file system but improvement is needed in backup
Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address and resolve them. The product helps to have a global file system. Also, it helps in data replication from region to region.
Abhilash Gopidas - PeerSpot reviewer
The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great
The product has no downtime. Automated scaling is a valuable feature. During peak hours, the datasets are on a higher volume. We need scaling in place. Otherwise, there's a degradation in the performance. We might sometimes miss data, or there will be no data sync between systems. Auto-scaling helps deal with performance needs during peak hours. There's no lag time for processing data.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
32%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?
Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...
What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?
The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Kubernetes Engine?
I'm aware of the normal pricing, but it's not on top of my head. AWS is generally cheaper than GCP for most use cases. Costing fluctuates based on different purposes and sizes.
What needs improvement with Google Kubernetes Engine?
The primary area for improvement would be the complexity involved when working with Google Kubernetes Engine, especially when using Terraform. It can be more complex compared to AWS. Additionally, ...
 

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service
GKE
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind
Philips Lighting, Alpha Vertex, GroupBy, BQ
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Google Kubernetes Engine and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.