Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo

Top 10 Google Kubernetes Engine Alternatives

Vendor: Google
4.0 out of 5
Start review

Top Google Kubernetes Engine Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Google Kubernetes Engine based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include VMware Tanzu Platform, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, and Rancher Labs. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Google Kubernetes Engine surpasses its competitors by offering seamless auto-scaling, integrated developer tools, and robust security features that enhance container orchestration, making it an ideal choice for businesses seeking efficient, scalable, and secure cloud solutions.

Google Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Google, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine excels with auto-scaling, integration, and ease of use, suitable for straightforward managed services. In comparison, VMware Tanzu offers strong VMware integration, appealing to enterprises heavily invested in VMware's ecosystem despite its higher cost and less flexibility across environments.
Download Google Kubernetes Engine vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
Google Kubernetes Engine typically offers lower initial setup costs, while VMware Tanzu Platform often incurs higher expenditure. These differences highlight Google Kubernetes Engine’s cost-effectiveness compared to VMware Tanzu Platform's potentially greater financial commitment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Kubernetes Engine typically offers lower initial setup costs, while VMware Tanzu Platform often incurs higher expenditure. These differences highlight Google Kubernetes Engine’s cost-effectiveness compared to VMware Tanzu Platform's potentially greater financial commitment upfront.
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
4.2 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine excels at autoscaling and integration across cloud platforms, simplifying management. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform emphasizes security alongside development tools. Tech buyers might choose Google for automation efficiency, while others could prefer OpenShift for robust security features.
Download Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Report
Google Kubernetes Engine requires a lower initial setup cost compared to Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, which involves higher upfront investments.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Kubernetes Engine requires a lower initial setup cost compared to Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, which involves higher upfront investments.
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Rancher Labs provides seamless integration and scalability with open-source flexibility, reducing vendor lock-in. In comparison, Google Kubernetes Engine offers comprehensive ecosystem integration and a managed environment, simplifying infrastructure management for users within Google's cloud, suitable for businesses seeking extensive cloud capabilities.
Download Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Rancher Labs Report
Rancher Labs offers an open-source solution minimizing setup costs, while Google Kubernetes Engine requires a paid plan with additional support services.
View comparison
Pricing
Rancher Labs offers an open-source solution minimizing setup costs, while Google Kubernetes Engine requires a paid plan with additional support services.
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Kubernetes
4.3 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Kubernetes
4.3 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine provides managed services for easy deployment and management with integration into Google's ecosystem. In comparison, Kubernetes offers flexibility with open-source contributions and migration ease, though it demands more management knowledge, suitable for users needing scalability across multiple platforms.
Download Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Kubernetes Report
Google Kubernetes Engine offers a streamlined setup with potentially high initial costs compared to Kubernetes, which may involve lower initial expenses but requires more manual configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Kubernetes Engine offers a streamlined setup with potentially high initial costs compared to Kubernetes, which may involve lower initial expenses but requires more manual configurations.
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
3.8 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine excels in microservices and scalability, supporting multi-cloud deployment with integration into the Google ecosystem. In comparison, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine offers quick deployment and virtualization within Nutanix's ecosystem. Tech buyers may prefer GKE for cloud capabilities and NKE for on-premises efficiency.
Download Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Report
Google Kubernetes Engine offers a straightforward setup process with transparent cost estimations, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE provides flexibility but with potentially higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Kubernetes Engine offers a straightforward setup process with transparent cost estimations, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE provides flexibility but with potentially higher initial setup costs.
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Docker
4.3 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Docker
4.3 out of 5
GKE offers advanced autoscaling and seamless cloud integration, enhancing scalability. In comparison, Docker focuses on security and portability with effective containerization. GKE's managed services ease infrastructure demands, while Docker’s open-source model appeals to cost-sensitive tech buyers seeking flexibility.
Download Docker vs. Google Kubernetes Engine Report
Google Kubernetes Engine requires higher initial setup costs due to its complex configuration, while Docker offers a simpler setup process that typically incurs lower costs, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployments.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Kubernetes Engine requires higher initial setup costs due to its complex configuration, while Docker offers a simpler setup process that typically incurs lower costs, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployments.
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Amazon Elastic Container Service
4.2 out of 5
Google Kubernetes Engine offers ease of deployment, resource management, and superior integration within Google's ecosystem. In comparison, Amazon Elastic Container Service provides cost-effective scalability with features like pay-as-you-go pricing and robust AWS support, potentially delivering better cost control and infrastructure scaling.
Download Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Google Kubernetes Engine Report
Google Kubernetes Engine typically incurs significant setup costs, while Amazon Elastic Container Service offers comparatively lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Kubernetes Engine typically incurs significant setup costs, while Amazon Elastic Container Service offers comparatively lower initial expenses.
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
Google Kubernetes Engine Logo
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform
3.5 out of 5

Accelerate your journey to hybrid cloud with the industry’s first enterprise-grade container software platform for cloud-native and distributed non-cloud native applications.

View comparison

Related categories

Container Management
Build Automation
PaaS Clouds