Google Kubernetes Engine vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform comparison

"The product has no downtime."

"GKE is easier to understand and use than Elastic Kubernetes Service."

"The most valuable feature of Google Kubernetes Engine is how you can automatically scale and load balance."

"Google Kubernetes Engine's most valuable features are microservices and its acquisition rate, which is very useful for scaling perspective."

"Stability is perfect for me."

"The most beneficial feature is the ability to separate each project and manage permissions more effectively."

"The main advantage of GKE is that it is a managed service. This means that Google is responsible for managing the master node in the Kubernetes cluster system. As a result, we can focus on deploying applications to the slaves, while Google handles any updates and security patches. The fact that GKE is fully integrated into the Google ecosystem, including solutions such as BigQuery and VertexAI. This makes it easier for us to integrate these tools into our process. This integration ultimately speeds up our time to market and reduces the time and effort spent on managing infrastructure. The managed aspect of GKE allows us to simply deploy and utilize it without having to worry about the technicalities of infrastructure management."

"Stability-wise, this solution is really good."

"If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."

"Log observability could be made easier so someone from high school can use it without having technological expertise."

"I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten."

"t is not very stable."

"The user interface could be improved."

"Google Kubernetes Engine is less stable in some highly complex deployments with many nodes."

"The product could be cheaper."

"There is room for improvement in this solution. For example, auto-scaling can be complex. We expect it to be easier to set up and manage, even for our customers."

"The management UI could be improved."

"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."

"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price. The product is competitively priced."

"Pricing is a bit expensive compared to some other products, but it's acceptable."

"The price for Google Kubernetes Engine could be lower - I'd rate its pricing at three out of five."

"Its pricing is good. They bill us only per user. That's nice."

"Initially, Google Kubernetes Engine was a little bit cheaper, but now its prices have been increased compared to the pricing model and the features that are made available by its competitors."

"I would rate Kubernetes' pricing four out of five."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"This is an open source solution, so there is no pricing or licensing."