Google Kubernetes Engine vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform comparison

"I rate Google Kubernetes Engine a ten out of ten."

"I am impressed with the product's output scaling."

"On the tip of a command, you can scale in or scale out, and it offers every robust platform to implement DevOps processes for your automation solutions. The product fully supports the IaC concept."

"The main advantage of GKE is that it is a managed service. This means that Google is responsible for managing the master node in the Kubernetes cluster system. As a result, we can focus on deploying applications to the slaves, while Google handles any updates and security patches. The fact that GKE is fully integrated into the Google ecosystem, including solutions such as BigQuery and VertexAI. This makes it easier for us to integrate these tools into our process. This integration ultimately speeds up our time to market and reduces the time and effort spent on managing infrastructure. The managed aspect of GKE allows us to simply deploy and utilize it without having to worry about the technicalities of infrastructure management."

"The product has no downtime."

"The deployment of the cluster is very easy."

"We used automation for the initial setup. It was okay. So it wasn't too complex."

"Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) takes care of managing Kubernetes, including the main control plane. It also offers solutions for monitoring resources and handling external traffic, which is essential for us. Being a cloud-native solution, it relieves us from worrying about these operational aspects."

"The stability of the HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten."

"If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."

"Our critique is that we have to do too much work to get the cluster production-ready."

"I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten."

"The product's integration with third-party vendors needs improvement."

"I think that security is an important point, and there should be additional features for the evaluation of data in containers that will create a more secure environment for usage in multi-parent models."

"There is a limitation for our infrastructure. It's very complex to see in one dashboard all the components and all the behavior on performance. I am looking for some additional tools for that. If I want to check the disk or file storage, it gets complex. There should be an integrated dashboard so that we can manage everything through a single pane."

"The console for this solution could be improved because it is very limited."

"An area in which Google Kubernetes Engine could improve is configuration."

"Google Kubernetes Engine's cost should be improved because it is high."

"HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is not user-friendly and has many parts that are more difficult than Cloudera. It is also a complex solution and has low features for data management."

"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."

"Currently, it costs around $1000 per month which sorted our deployment. So once we get more clients, having a huge suffix, costs can go up."

"The price for Google Kubernetes Engine could be lower - I'd rate its pricing at three out of five."

"Initially, Google Kubernetes Engine was a little bit cheaper, but now its prices have been increased compared to the pricing model and the features that are made available by its competitors."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"This is an open source solution, so there is no pricing or licensing."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"Its pricing is good. They bill us only per user. That's nice."