Amazon EMR vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System comparison

"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."

"Amazon EMR has multiple connectors that can connect to various data sources."

"When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark."

"Amazon EMR's most valuable features are processing speed and data storage capacity."

"This is the best tool for hosts and it's really flexible and scalable."

"The solution is pretty simple to set up."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"It has a variety of options and support systems."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System's most valuable feature is its ecosystems and seamless integration with other Microsoft reporting platforms and databases."

"This solution will connect to any database, you can combine databases, and you can create a cube or tabular model."

"The Cube Solution is quite different when compared to the rest of the competition and has unique functionality for advanced analytics."

"Helps our customers to discover trends, which provides useful information based on their business."

"I like that it's integrated with other Azure products."

"It is closely integrated with other products in the MS portfolio."

"We leverage its capabilities for many applications. We can integrate with our databases, like Oracle, MySQL, or any other, using Microsoft Integration Services."

"This is a well-integrated solution and that integration empowers results."

"The problem for us is it starts very slow."

"Amazon EMR can improve by adding some features, such as megastore services and HiveServer2. Additionally, the user interface could be better, similar to what Apache service provides, cross-platform services."

"Modules and strategies should be better handled and notified early in advance."

"As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"The legacy versions of the solution are not supported in the new versions."

"The dashboard management could be better. Right now, it's lacking a bit."

"We don't have much control. If we have multiple users, if they want to scale up, the cost will go and increase and we don't know how we can restrict that price part."

"Machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities need to be more friendly for beginning users."

"Functionality needs to be more up-to-date with competing products."

"I think the biggest problem with the product is that it does a data ingest model, which is very expensive."

"The flexibility of this solution needs to be improved because you cannot make changes at every one of the different steps."

"The pricing model needs to be improved."

"​Hybrid environments are complex to manage."

"Releases of new products and functionality is never accompanied by associated documentation, training and resources that adequately explain the release."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System could have better support."

"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."

"The initial price is lower than Oracle, but extensive use of SQL may lead to a higher total cost of ownership."

"I rate Microsoft Analytics Platform System a seven out of ten for pricing."

"We are currently paying $200,000 a year for all the different parts of the suite during an ingest model Microsoft now charges us $700,000 a year."

"Users have to pay extra for premium-level technical support."