Amazon EMR vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse comparison

"When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark."

"The project management is very streamlined."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"I rate Amazon EMR as ten out of ten."

"One of the valuable features about this solution is that it's managed services, so it's pretty stable, and scalable as much as you wish. It has all the necessary distributions. With some additional work, it's also possible to change to a Spark version with the latest version of EMR. It also has Hudi, so we are leveraging Apache Hudi on EMR for change data capture, so then it comes out-of-the-box in EMR."

"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."

"The solution helps us manage huge volumes of data."

"The ability to resize the cluster is what really makes it stand out over other Hadoop and big data solutions."

"A robust and efficient product."

"It is a robust system."

"The security and audit procedures are the most valuable features."

"Transformation is a valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver. I can transform the data as per my needs or my client's needs. For example, flat tables can be transformed with respect to our requirements to combine multiple modules into one single table, and we can derive analytics."

"It's an excellent over-all tool for managers to analyze their business."

"It provides us with proof of data, we can centralize all of the information, check it, and then provide the information to our users."

"Data modeling is a valuable feature."

"Amazon EMR is continuously improving, but maybe something like CI/CD out-of-the-box or integration with Prometheus Grafana."

"Modules and strategies should be better handled and notified early in advance."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data."

"The product's features for storing data in static clusters could be better."

"The solution can become expensive if you are not careful."

"The most complicated thing is configuring to the cluster and ensure it's running correctly."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"It is difficult when your native language is not English. It is difficult for us to explain our issue and also difficult for the technical team to explain a resolution to us."

"There are performance issues in terms of scalability and availability."

"The program is difficult to learn to use"

"Design and modeling could be simplified."

"The product could provide more features."

"Connectors are complex, and it is difficult to understand or know which connector should be used. For instance, if I want to connect APIs, I will not be able to do it directly. I would have to go to the portal integration to get the data. Therefore, having simplified connectors will make things much easier."

"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."

"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"All SAP products are expensive."

"The licensing cost is high for SAP NetWeaver compared to that for other products."

"Pricing is based on the number of user IDs and tyhe user ID works across a suite of products."