AWS Lake Formation vs Amazon Redshift comparison

Amazon Redshift and AWS Lake Formation are both solutions in the Cloud Data Warehouse category. Amazon Redshift is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9, while AWS Lake Formation is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.1. Amazon Redshift holds a 7.1% mindshare in CDW, compared to AWS Lake Formation’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Redshift users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of AWS Lake Formation users who would recommend it.

Amazon Redshift

Read 73 Amazon Redshift reviews

4,140 Views
2,857 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AWS Lake Formation

Read 21 AWS Lake Formation reviews

1,793 Views
1,506 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Amazon Redshift

AWS Lake Formation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Amazon Redshift and AWS Lake Formation are leading players in the cloud data management and warehousing segment. Redshift appears to have the upper hand in data processing and scalability, while AWS Lake Formation excels in data governance and integration capabilities.

Features: Amazon Redshift offers scalability that supports the handling of petabytes of data, flexible node configuration, and multi-format file compatibility for data reading. Its distributed architecture enhances performance, and its VPC configuration ensures robust security. AWS Lake Formation stands out with its strong data governance capabilities, comprehensive data catalog, and automated data classification. It also effectively integrates with other AWS services for structured dataset management.

Room for Improvement: Amazon Redshift could improve in snapshot restoring speeds for large datasets and efficient data recovery across clusters. There are calls for better OLAP features and enhanced integration with other databases. AWS Lake Formation has limitations in external integration and lacks some advanced data management features, with users desiring improved support in real-time monitoring and audit capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Redshift supports public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments, offering flexibility across setups. AWS Lake Formation is mainly utilized in public cloud environments. Both products provide reliable customer support, though advanced help for Redshift requires paid plans, and enhanced support services across AWS can be costly.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon Redshift is seen as cost-effective for larger data scales due to its pay-per-use model but can be expensive for smaller datasets. AWS Lake Formation’s pricing can be complex, influenced by integration with other services like S3, Glue, and Athena. Although Redshift might be more expensive than alternatives, its value increases with data volume. AWS Lake Formation's cost varies based on existing AWS usage, with optimizations necessary to maximize ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Lake Formation vs. Amazon Redshift Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lake Formation vs. Amazon Redshift

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,426 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift

Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (5th), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (8th)

AWS Lake Formation

Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Amazon Redshift is 7.1%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Lake Formation is 4.4%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon Redshift	7.1%
AWS Lake Formation	4.4%
Other	88.5%

Cloud Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

Hemanthreddy Vakiti

Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Optimized restaurant analytics has driven faster insights and streamlined daily reporting

Amazon Redshift offers massive parallel processing capability, allowing it to handle millions of records, along with integration with other AWS features such as S3 and QuickSight. The column-level storage supports high performance and easy data retrieval compared to other tools. The integration with S3 has helped my team immensely since S3 is our starting source, and the direct integration with Amazon Redshift simplifies the transformation and loading process. Columnar storage has benefited our performance significantly, allowing us to extract specific rows from tables with years of data much faster than other tools with row-level storage. Amazon Redshift has positively impacted our organization by significantly improving query performance and speed. Features such as easy integration with S3 allow us to process millions of records efficiently, ultimately saving us nearly one hour per day for our project.

Read full review

Ciro Baldim Guerra

Sr Analytics Engineer at Itau Unibanco S.A.

Has improved data governance by enabling clear ownership and structured access across teams

In my company, Itaú, we don't utilize all AWS offerings due to rigorous security measures. We operate approximately six to eight months behind other available services. I'm uncertain if gaps exist because of this limitation, though the system functions effectively for us. AWS Lake Formation offers column-level access control for databases, but we haven't implemented this feature either because it hasn't been approved by our compliance, governance, or security areas. In our current setup, everyone from my business unit uses the same consumer account. When access is requested for a table, everyone using that business unit account receives access. This could present a security concern, though it benefits new team members who automatically receive all necessary access permissions. However, I struggle to identify specific improvements needed in AWS Lake Formation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Redshift has been the data warehouse in at least three of my previous companies."

"It helped my customers migrate off on-premise platforms such as Teradata to Redshift, at a fraction of the cost."

"We use it to build a data warehouse and a centralized location for all of our data sources, allowing for in-depth analysis by using SQL queries."

"You can copy JSON to the column and have it analyzed using simple functions."

"Its simplicity in configuration, cost-effectiveness due to being in the cloud and close to our data sources, and the fact that it's a managed service that is scalable and reliable are highly valuable."

"The solution is easy to set up and use."

"Redshift's versioning and data security are the two most critical features. When migrating into the cloud, it's vital to secure the data. The encryption and security are there."

"Redshift's versioning and data security are the two most critical features; when migrating into the cloud, it's vital to secure the data, and the encryption and security are there."

More Amazon Redshift pros

"AWS Lake Formation significantly improves the structure of the data mesh, making it superior to previous structures we used."

"The most valuable features of AWS Lake Formation were the access model itself, as it allows implementation of filters, Blueprints, and row-level and column-level security to mask data that shouldn't be accessed by certain entities, enabling granular control without exposing PII data."

"AWS Lake Formation significantly improves the structure of the data mesh, making it superior to previous structures we used."

"AWS Lake Formation has several valuable features that enhance data management, and one particularly beneficial aspect is how it facilitates better collaboration within data teams."

"The most important advantage in using AWS Lake Formation is its ability to connect the data lake to the other technologies in AWS. This is what I advise my clients."

"The LF-Tag system with granular permissions was key to the project as a functionality of AWS Lake Formation."

"We use AWS Lake Formation typically for the data warehouse."

"The solution is quite good at handling analytics."

More AWS Lake Formation pros

Cons

"Running parallel queries results in poor performance and this needs to be improved."

"The only minor issue I faced was that it took a bit longer than expected to change the cluster to have more space or storage."

"Currently, Amazon does not provide real-time or near real-time integration with other products like RDS or DynamoDB out-of-the-box."

"Amazon should provide more cloud-native tools that can integrate with Redshift like Microsoft's development tools for Azure."

"Query compilation time needs a lot of improvement for cases where you are generating queries dynamically."

"It would be useful to have an option where all of the data can be queried at once and then have the result shown."

"It lacks a few features which can be very useful, such as stored procedures"

"It is difficult to work with unstructured data and JSON documents."

More Amazon Redshift cons

"The solution could make improvements around orchestration and doing some automation stuff on AWS front automation. It would be useful if we could use automation to build images and use hardened images which are CIS compliant."

"It falls short when it comes to more granular access control, such as cell-level or row-level entitlements which is a significant drawback for organizations that require precise control over who can access specific rows of data."

"The initial onboarding process is challenging because creating a plan takes a month to a month and a half to build out."

"In our current setup, everyone from my business unit uses the same consumer account. When access is requested for a table, everyone using that business unit account receives access. This could present a security concern, though it benefits new team members who automatically receive all necessary access permissions."

"In our experience what could be improved are not the support, performance or monitoring, but at a managerial level, the very expensive professional services of AWS. This could be an area of improvement for them. It's too expensive to acquire their support."

"I think AWS Lake Formation could improve by enforcing the least privilege by design, moving from ad hoc grants to role-based access controls."

"For the end-users, it's not as user-friendly as it could be."

"Despite following official documentation, configuration problems persisted, requiring weeks of support from multiple AWS engineers to resolve."

More AWS Lake Formation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has very competitive pricing."

"Per hour pricing is helpful to keep the costs of a pilot down, but long-term retention is expensive."

"The price of Amazon Redshift is reasonable because it depends on the usage that you use and for DWH for the long term."

"One of my customers went with Google Big Query over Redshift because it was significantly cheaper for their project."

"At the moment, pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it depends on the size of the company."

"The part that I like best is that you only pay for what you are using."

"I have heard complaints about the solution’s pricing, and thus I rate it as a five."

"It's around $200 US dollars. There are some data transfer costs but it's minimal, around $20."

More Amazon Redshift pricing and cost advice

"AWS Lake Formation is a bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?

Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?

The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Redshift?

The pricing of Amazon Redshift is expensive.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Lake Formation?

I don't understand much about the pricing of AWS Lake Formation, but I know how to search for the cost of Glue jobs, and I use the calculator in Amazon. I use a tool to preview the cost based on th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Lake Formation?

Regarding areas of AWS Lake Formation that could be improved or enhanced, I prefer not to answer, mainly because I do not believe that I would be the most valuable person to ask, as I have not used...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Lake Formation?

My usual use cases for AWS Lake Formation involved securing and governing the data resources that we configured in AWS, but we did not use the analytics or machine learning capabilities specificall...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snowflake vs Amazon Redshift

Compared 14% of the time

Teradata vs Amazon Redshift

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics vs Amazon Redshift

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Db2 Warehouse vs Amazon Redshift

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Db2 Warehouse on Cloud vs Amazon Redshift

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon Redshift Competitors

Snowflake vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 12% of the time

Databricks vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 12% of the time

BigQuery vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon EMR vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Lake Formation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Redshift

April 2026

Download Amazon Redshift product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lake Formation

April 2026

Download AWS Lake Formation product report

Overview

Amazon Redshift is a fully administered, petabyte-scale cloud-based data warehouse service. Users are able to begin with a minimal amount of gigabytes of data and can easily scale up to a petabyte or more as needed. This will enable them to utilize their own data to develop new intuitions on how to improve business processes and client relations.

Initially, users start to develop a data warehouse by initiating what is called an Amazon Redshift cluster or a set of nodes. Once the cluster has been provisioned, users can seamlessly upload data sets, and then begin to perform data analysis queries. Amazon Redshift delivers super-fast query performance, regardless of size, utilizing the exact SQL-based tools and BI applications that most users are already working with today.

The Amazon Redshift service performs all of the work of setting up, operating, and scaling a data warehouse. These tasks include provisioning capacity, monitoring and backing up the cluster, and applying patches and upgrades to the Amazon Redshift engine.

Amazon Redshift Functionalities

Amazon Redshift has many valuable key functionalities. Some of its most useful functionalities include:

Cluster administration: The Amazon Redshift cluster is a group of nodes that contains a leader node and one (or more) compute node(s). The compute nodes needed are dependent on the data size, amount of queries needed, and the query execution functionality desired.
Cluster snapshots: Snapshots are backups of a cluster from an exact point in time. Amazon Redshift offers two types of snapshots: manual and automated. Amazon will store these snapshots internally in the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) utilizing an SSL connection. Whenever a Snapshot restore is needed, Amazon Redshift will create a new cluster and will import data from the snapshot as directed.
Cluster access: Amazon Redshift provides several intuitive features to help define connectivity rules, encrypt data and connections, and control the overall access of your cluster.
IAM credentials and AWS accounts: The Amazon Redshift cluster is only accessible by the AWS account that created the cluster. This automatically secures the cluster and keeps it safe. Inside the AWS account, users access the AWS Identity and IAM protocol to create additional user accounts and manage permissions, granting specified users the desired access needed to control cluster performance.
Encryption: Users have the option to choose to encrypt the clusters for additional added security once the cluster is provisioned. When encryption is enabled, Amazon Redshift will store all the data in user-created tables in a secure encrypted format. To manage Amazon Redshift encryption keys, users will access AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS).

Reviews from Real Users

“Redshift's versioning and data security are the two most critical features. When migrating into the cloud, it's vital to secure the data. The encryption and security are there.” - Kundan A., Senior Consultant at Dynamic Elements AS

“With the cloud version whenever you want to deploy, you can scale up, and down, and it has a data warehousing capability. Redshift has many features. They have enriched and elaborate documentation that is helpful.”- Aishwarya K., Solution Architect at Capgemini

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AWS Lake Formation is a service that makes it easy to set up a secure data lake in days. A data lake is a centralized, curated, and secured repository that stores all your data, both in its original form and prepared for analysis.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lake Formation vs. Amazon Redshift

March 2026

Free Report: AWS Lake Formation vs. Amazon Redshift

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Lake Formation vs. Amazon Redshift and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Lake Formation vs. Amazon Redshift report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.