Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Redshift vs Snowflake comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 22, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Snowflake
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
98
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Amazon Redshift is 7.7%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snowflake is 28.9%, up from 24.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
 

Q&A Highlights

Padmanesh NC - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2017
 

Featured Reviews

Ved Prakash Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a data warehouse system and collects data from different sources
In terms of improvement, I believe Amazon Redshift could work on reducing its costs, as they tend to increase significantly. Additionally, there are occasional issues with nodes going down, which can be problematic. We often encounter issues like someone dropping a column or changing the order of columns, which can cause synchronization problems when pushing data through our pipeline. It's a minor issue, but it can be annoying.
VivekSingh 1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good data ingestion capability, but should include more AI capabilities
The solution's integration aspect is good, and all the connectors are in place. I found Snowflake similar to RDS. We use it for both data in motion and data in transit. It looks like the tool handles the data quite securely. We create ETL patterns. We ingest data from different source systems, and we have to create data pipelines. It would be useful if we could have AI features added to identify what I'm going to do with this data. It would be good if it could look at the data and help me create an automated pipeline instead of me creating a pipeline by myself. I'm from a retail background. I completed my Oracle DBA training a long time ago, about 18 years ago. I was quite familiar with the Snowflake and relational database concepts since I had already completed the Oracle ops, DBA ops, OCP, and OPA courses. For me, it was a journey similar to when I shifted from Oracle RDS to Snowflake. Although I was quite familiar with most of the concepts, there were some learnings. Whosoever is in the data field should at least try Snowflake once. They will then realize the best features in the solution and can continue using it. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For the on-premises version of Amazon Redshift, we need to start from scratch. However, with the cloud version whenever you want to deploy, you can scale up, and down, and it has a data warehousing capability. Redshift has many features."
"Has a very user-friendly SQL editor and it's very easy to use the connectors."
"It's scalable because it's on the cloud."
"I like the cost-benefit ratio, meaning that it is as easy to use as it is powerful and well-performing."
"It allows for the storage of huge amounts of data."
"It is quite simple to use and there are no issues with creating the tables."
"The ability to reload data multiple times at different times."
"Though Amazon Redshift is good, it depends on what kind of business you're trying to do, what type of analytics you need, and how much data you have."
"Time travel is one feature that really helps us out."
"Once you have finished your designs they can be easily imported to Snowflake and the information can be readily accessed without an IT expert."
"The pricing is reasonable and matches the rest of the market."
"Great scalability and near zero maintenance."
"I like the ability to work with a managed service on the cloud and that is easy to start with."
"The Mbps they have established is quite a bit faster than any other data warehouse."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"This is the advanced version of the cloud version, so it's really a flexible tool. If you have it implemented at home, you can access it from anywhere."
 

Cons

"We are using third-party tools to integrate Amazon Redshift, they should create their own interface on their own for it to be easily connected on the AWS itself."
"Planting is the primary key enforcement that should be improved."
"There are physically too many pipelines for a company of this size to maintain. For a data scientist, it's very difficult to learn the data in all of these different environments."
"The explain panel in the Redshift database could be better."
"They should provide a better way to work with interim data in a structured way than to store it in parquet files locally."
"The product must become a bit more serverless."
"Migrating data from other data sources can be challenging when you are working with multibyte character sets."
"The initial deployment was complex."
"Snowflake has to improve their spatial parts since it doesn't have much in terms of geo-spatial queries."
"There is a scope for improvement. They don't currently support integration with some of the Azure and AWS native services. It would be good if they can enhance their product to integrate with these services."
"Getting data out of the tool to third-party applications is difficult."
"Some SQL language functions could be included."
"The scheduling system can definitely be better because we had to use external airflow for that. There should be orchestration for the scheduling system. Snowflake currently does not support machine learning, so it is just storage. They also need some alternatives for SQL Query. There should also be support for Spark in different languages such as Python."
"They should improve the reporting tools."
"The user interface continues to be an issue, especially when we need to get data out of Snowflake. It's very easy to get data in, but it's not too easy to get it out or extract it."
"Portability is a big hurdle right now for our clients. Porting all of your existing SQL ecosystem, such as stored procedures, to Snowflake is a major pain point. Currently, Snowflake stored procedures use JavaScript, but they should support SQL-based stored procedures. It would be a huge advantage if you can write your stored procedures using SQL. It seems that they are working on this feature, and they are yet to release it. I remember seeing some notes saying that they were going to do that in the future, but the sooner this feature comes out, it would be better for Snowflake because there are a lot of clients with whom I'm interacting, and their main hurdle is to take their existing Oracle or SQL Server stored procedures and move them into Snowflake. For this, you need to learn JavaScript and how it works, which is not easy and becomes a little tricky. If it supports SQL-based procedures, then you can just cut-paste the SQL code, run it, and easily fix small issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My customers have implementations that cost about $500 a month for a very small one. I also have a customer with a monthly invoice of about $25,000 USD."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The price of Amazon Redshift is reasonable because it depends on the usage that you use and for DWH for the long term."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a seven."
"The solution is available at a mid-range price compared to other vendors."
"It's around $200 US dollars. There are some data transfer costs but it's minimal, around $20."
"The product is cheap considering what it provides; I rate it five out of five for affordability."
"The best part about this solution is the cost."
"Currently, we have a trial account, so we don't need a license. After our project starts, we would need a permanent license."
"The product's price range falls between average to a bit expensive range. I think the tool is worth the money if you use it properly."
"Comparing Snowflake to on-prem options such as Oracle or SAP, it seemed more cost-effective."
"It is hard to say because we're usually engaged in the transition as opposed to the long term. Their storage costs are easily within pennies of what AWS S3 would normally cost. Most of the clients I've been working with are in the financial sector, and they're relatively small. I would put them in an SMB connection. The first thing we have to bring up for people is that they're going to build this. They shouldn't store their data in S3. They should pipeline directly into Snowflake and use it on their storage. So, the cost is a big issue because these are small to medium size companies, and that is the biggest thing we had to price point for them."
"Oracle is less expensive than Snowflake."
"The price of Snowflake is very reasonable."
"Snowflake’s pricing is transparent. It is one of the cheapest cloud database warehouse providers. The tool follows a credit cost model. Everything on Snowflake is charged on the basis of credits. The credits depend on the cloud region and the public cloud provider that we use. Hence, the cost per credit will be different for AWS in Frankfurt and AWS in India. I think North Virginia is the cheapest region in terms of cost per credit. You will be consuming around 16 credits for large data warehouses."
"Snowflake is a cost-effective solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
824,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

Padmanesh NC - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2017
Dec 26, 2017
Interesting. Snowflake has a fundamentally different architecture in that compute and storage are completely separated allowing you to scale each dynamically and independently This makes me to get into Snowflake, Almost I am using Snowflake last 8 months. Its awesome.
2 out of 4 answers
it_user492777 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 20, 2017
Wow, that is a loaded question and hard to answer and not sound like a sales pitch (I will try). For one, Snowflake has a fundamentally different architecture in that compute and storage are completely separated allowing you to scale each dynamically and independently. That is as you load data the space just expands - no need to add more clusters, extents, files etc. Likewise if you need more compute power, you can resize the compute clusters on the fly using a drop down in the UI to add more nodes while the process is running. No need to put it in read only mode, export the data, then import to a bigger cluster. This is only possible because of the separation of compute and storage. Most other architectures (based on legacy systems) have the compute and storage more tightly coupled. Along with this architecture you can create multiple independent compute clusters of differing sizes and assign each to different work groups or workloads (with access to the same single data store - no data replication required). With this each group gets its own dedicated compute resource such that what one does will not impact performance of the others. This is all new code - not a refactoring of any other RDBMS code base so the founders were able to create features that take advantage of the elasticity of the cloud. In addition Snwoflake can ingest JSON data natively into relational table using a new data type designed to hold semi-structured data (which allows true schema on read using SQL). Very stable - over 400 customers to date. Some with over 1 PB of data and hundreds of users. It also has built in security -256 bit AES encryption of all data in motion and at rest by default with no impact on query performance. Pricing (I am not in sales!) - the pricing is public and on the website: https://www.snowflake.net/product/pricing/ You can check my post about my favorite features for more details: https://www.snowflake.net/top-10-cool-things-i-like-about-snowflake/ As for comparisons to RedShift you would have to talk with some real customers who have done the POCs with both of us. You might also look at some of the customer videos and case studies, but none of them really call out where we replaced RedShift as that tends to be kept confidential. https://www.snowflake.net/our-customers/
MM
Dec 25, 2017
Although I verified it only in a specific case, I performed performance verification with Redshift, BigQuery, Snowflake. Redshift has data redistribution occurred when searching under various conditions and performance was not good, but Snowflake holds data in small units called micro partitions, and also manages data for each column Therefore, operation like data redistribution was minimal and high performance was obtained. Snowflake can also start multiple clusters in the same database, but has an architecture in which conflicts do not occur even when accessing the same data between clusters. I recommend you to try it.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Educational Organization
36%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
What do you like most about Snowflake?
The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake?
The pricing part is based on the computing and storage. The costs are different and then there are services costs as well. I have heard that Snowflake is costlier than Redshift or GCP BigQuery. A s...
What needs improvement with Snowflake?
I think people do not want to create pipelines for many customers now. Normally, we have this layer architecture, like layer one, layer two, layer three, or layer four, where we have raw data, inte...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Snowflake Computing
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Redshift vs. Snowflake and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.