Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Redshift vs Snowflake comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 22, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Snowflake
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Amazon Redshift is 7.8%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snowflake is 29.0%, up from 24.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
 

Q&A Highlights

Padmanesh NC - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2017
 

Featured Reviews

Ved Prakash Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a data warehouse system and collects data from different sources
In terms of improvement, I believe Amazon Redshift could work on reducing its costs, as they tend to increase significantly. Additionally, there are occasional issues with nodes going down, which can be problematic. We often encounter issues like someone dropping a column or changing the order of columns, which can cause synchronization problems when pushing data through our pipeline. It's a minor issue, but it can be annoying.
Snehasish Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Transformation in data querying speed with good migration capabilities
Snowflake is a data lake on the cloud where all processing happens in memory, resulting in very fast query responses. One key feature is the separation of compute and storage, which eliminates storage limitations. It also has tools for migrating data from legacy databases like Oracle. Its stability and efficiency enhance performance greatly. Tools in the AI/ML marketplace are readily available without needing development.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Redshift has an advantage when it comes to administration, making it easier to manage and collaborate."
"The initial setup of this solution is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon Redshift is its ability to handle really large sets of data."
"The main benefit is that our portal for end users is running in AWS, so we can easily connect it to other AWS services."
"With the APIs that are available, it can be easily integrated with other tools."
"The solution is easy to set up and use."
"It allows for the storage of huge amounts of data."
"Easy to build out our snowflake design and load data."
"The feature that is really striking is the ability to translate the SQL workloads into the NoSQL version that can be used by Snowflake."
"It is a very well-distributed system. It has different data engines for different applications. Many applications can use different computational engines at the same time. In terms of data processing, the feeling was similar to working with a relational database but in a scalable way."
"Time travel is one feature that really helps us out."
"The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power."
"The product is quite fast."
"The adaptation to development languages is most valuable. Our developers can SQL code or something else. It has been convenient in that regard."
"A user-friendly and reliable solution."
"The Time Travel feature is helpful for accessing historical data and the ability to clone external tables is useful."
 

Cons

"The customer support could be more responsive."
"Infinite storage is available in Snowflake and is not available in Redshift."
"It would be useful to have an option where all of the data can be queried at once and then have the result shown."
"The initial deployment was complex."
"They should provide a better way to work with interim data in a structured way than to store it in parquet files locally."
"The product must become a bit more serverless."
"The explain panel in the Redshift database could be better."
"Sometimes, it's difficult to get the metadata from Redshift."
"It would benefit from an administration that allows you to be aware of your credit consumption once you have the service so that you may be sure how many credits you are consuming when you use the platform and to make sure that you are making the most efficient use of these resources. In other words, to improve their interface so that you may monitor the consumption of your credits on Cloud."
"I am still in the learning stage. It has good security, but it can always be more secure."
"Snowflake has support for stored procedures, but it is not that powerful."
"Cost reduction is one area I would like Snowflake to improve. The product is not very cheap, and a reduction in costs would be appreciated."
"The documentation could improve. They should provide architecture information."
"I would like to see more transparency in data processing, ATLs, and compute areas - which should give more comfort to the end users."
"I can only access Snowflake from the web. It would be better if we could have an app that we can install locally on our laptops to connect to the server without needing to go to the web page. Apart from that, it's hard to point out any limitations in the tool."
"The product is not very cheap, and a reduction in costs would be appreciated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing for Amazon Redshift is reasonable, though it could be somewhat higher than other solutions, such as Azure. Still, when you base your comparison on the services offered and the pricing, it's the most reasonable versus its competitors, such as RDS."
"The solution is available at a mid-range price compared to other vendors."
"The cost will depend on how you set up your warehouse and what kind of data you store."
"For Amazon Redshift, we pay around INR 60,000 annually. The cost factor also depends on the number of existing customers."
"Per hour pricing is helpful to keep the costs of a pilot down, but long-term retention is expensive."
"The cost must be improved."
"At the moment, pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it depends on the size of the company."
"If you want a fixed price, an to not worry about every query, but you need to manage your nodes personally, use Redshift."
"Oracle is less expensive than Snowflake."
"There is a license needed to use this solution. There are a few licensing options available. They have a pay-as-you-go option, but it is recommended to pay upfront."
"The pricing is economical as compared to traditional solutions like Oracle and competitive pricing."
"I have not been billed yet, but it should be less. I'm still running the trial version, but it seems to be less than Databricks."
"Comparing Snowflake to on-prem options such as Oracle or SAP, it seemed more cost-effective."
"The product's price range falls between average to a bit expensive range. I think the tool is worth the money if you use it properly."
"The pricing part is based on the computing and storage. The costs are different and then there are services costs as well."
"Snowflake has consumption-based costs; users only pay for storage and computing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
831,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

Padmanesh NC - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2017
Dec 26, 2017
Interesting. Snowflake has a fundamentally different architecture in that compute and storage are completely separated allowing you to scale each dynamically and independently This makes me to get into Snowflake, Almost I am using Snowflake last 8 months. Its awesome.
2 out of 4 answers
it_user492777 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 20, 2017
Wow, that is a loaded question and hard to answer and not sound like a sales pitch (I will try). For one, Snowflake has a fundamentally different architecture in that compute and storage are completely separated allowing you to scale each dynamically and independently. That is as you load data the space just expands - no need to add more clusters, extents, files etc. Likewise if you need more compute power, you can resize the compute clusters on the fly using a drop down in the UI to add more nodes while the process is running. No need to put it in read only mode, export the data, then import to a bigger cluster. This is only possible because of the separation of compute and storage. Most other architectures (based on legacy systems) have the compute and storage more tightly coupled. Along with this architecture you can create multiple independent compute clusters of differing sizes and assign each to different work groups or workloads (with access to the same single data store - no data replication required). With this each group gets its own dedicated compute resource such that what one does will not impact performance of the others. This is all new code - not a refactoring of any other RDBMS code base so the founders were able to create features that take advantage of the elasticity of the cloud. In addition Snwoflake can ingest JSON data natively into relational table using a new data type designed to hold semi-structured data (which allows true schema on read using SQL). Very stable - over 400 customers to date. Some with over 1 PB of data and hundreds of users. It also has built in security -256 bit AES encryption of all data in motion and at rest by default with no impact on query performance. Pricing (I am not in sales!) - the pricing is public and on the website: https://www.snowflake.net/product/pricing/ You can check my post about my favorite features for more details: https://www.snowflake.net/top-10-cool-things-i-like-about-snowflake/ As for comparisons to RedShift you would have to talk with some real customers who have done the POCs with both of us. You might also look at some of the customer videos and case studies, but none of them really call out where we replaced RedShift as that tends to be kept confidential. https://www.snowflake.net/our-customers/
MM
Dec 25, 2017
Although I verified it only in a specific case, I performed performance verification with Redshift, BigQuery, Snowflake. Redshift has data redistribution occurred when searching under various conditions and performance was not good, but Snowflake holds data in small units called micro partitions, and also manages data for each column Therefore, operation like data redistribution was minimal and high performance was obtained. Snowflake can also start multiple clusters in the same database, but has an architecture in which conflicts do not occur even when accessing the same data between clusters. I recommend you to try it.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
63%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Educational Organization
37%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
What do you like most about Snowflake?
The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake?
Snowflake's pricing is on the higher side, rated as eight out of ten. If there were ways to reduce costs, it would be a positive improvement.
What needs improvement with Snowflake?
Cost reduction is one area I would like Snowflake to improve. The product is not very cheap, and a reduction in costs would be appreciated.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Snowflake Computing
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Redshift vs. Snowflake and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.