Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Anaconda Business vs IBM SPSS Statistics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.0
Anaconda Business boosts productivity and cost savings by reducing downtime, errors, and environment issues, enhancing efficiency.
Sentiment score
5.0
IBM SPSS Statistics delivers 50% ROI with its user-friendly interface, saving time and costs for diverse organizations.
Everyone being able to work smoothly without unnecessary delays.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I have seen a return on investment; specifically, when we talk about efficiency, it's both time-saving and money-saving.
Product managaer at Zidio development
I have seen a return on investment with time saved by 50% and less downtime, allowing the team to deliver projects faster with fewer errors.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.2
Anaconda Business customer service is well-aligned with user needs, offering helpful but occasionally delayed support and strong community resources.
Sentiment score
6.1
IBM SPSS Statistics offers variable customer support quality, with multiple help channels, but some users experience delays in response.
Anaconda Business customer support is very active with a quick response time.
System Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Overall, support was reliable when we needed it, just not super-fast every single time.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The customer support for Anaconda Business provides a better approach.
Product managaer at Zidio development
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Anaconda Business provides scalable solutions for diverse needs, offering smooth environment management and adaptability for growing user demands.
Sentiment score
6.1
IBM SPSS Statistics handles moderate data efficiently, though limitations exist for large datasets, with scalability impacted by resources and licensing.
As more environments or users get added, it still runs smoothly without major slowdowns.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda Business scales very well because it is built around centralized environment and package management.
System Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda does not have scalability restrictions as it depends on the type of machine running it.
VP Product at Medint
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Anaconda Business is reliable for data science, with stable performance, minimal downtime, improved management, despite minor delays.
Sentiment score
7.4
IBM SPSS Statistics is reliable and stable, performing well under moderate data loads, with occasional issues in newer versions.
Earlier, setting up or troubleshooting conflicts could take anywhere from thirty minutes to an hour, but now most setups just work.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Room For Improvement

Anaconda Business needs better OS support, intuitive interface, documentation, language options, cloud integration, security, and stability improvements.
IBM SPSS Statistics needs improved visualization, integration, user interface, documentation, pricing, and licensing to meet user demands effectively.
It would also be nice to have clearer error messages when something fails, so it is easier to understand what went wrong without digging too much.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
They should enhance the security point of view; it's good, but it needs some more advanced features.
Product managaer at Zidio development
The pricing should be a little lower for a single person to use, as it might be affordable for an organization, but for my single use, it is difficult.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I believe that the owners of IBM SPSS Statistics should think about improving the package itself to be able to treat unstructured data.
Associate Professor Of Statistics at a university with 10,001+ employees
I'm unsure if SPSS has a commercial offering for big servers, unlike KNIME, which does.
Emeritus Professor of Health Services Research at University of South Wales
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users are satisfied with Anaconda Business's value, despite some finding the paid version slightly costly for high-demand tasks.
IBM SPSS Statistics is costly but justified by comprehensive features, with pricing concerns and special deals for universities noted.
Anaconda is an open-source tool, so I do not pay anything for it.
VP Product at Medint
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a little costly, but it is useful.
Automation Test Engineer at Tata Consultancy services Limited
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is a bit costly, but it is useful.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
 

Valuable Features

Anaconda Business excels in library support, package management, and security, making it ideal for scalable, efficient data science.
IBM SPSS Statistics provides comprehensive statistical analysis, modeling, and data handling, featuring user-friendly interface and Python integration.
Anaconda Business has positively impacted my organization because, when discussing the security point of view, it's exceptional; when comparing it to other solutions, Anaconda Business is superior.
Product managaer at Zidio development
We find the advanced security, governance, and collaborative features for organizations using Python and R particularly useful.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda Business positively impacts our organization by protecting us from compliance and security risks while keeping the environment consistent, allowing our team to focus on insight and innovation instead of worrying about setups, security, and software issues.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
Predictive analytics is the most important part of analytics.
Associate Professor Of Statistics at a university with 10,001+ employees
I mainly used it for cross tabs, correlation, regression, chi-squared tests, and similar analyses often seen in published papers.
Emeritus Professor of Health Services Research at University of South Wales
 

Categories and Ranking

Anaconda Business
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM SPSS Statistics
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Data Mining (2nd), AI Data Analysis (13th), AI Research (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Anaconda Business is 2.6%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SPSS Statistics is 4.0%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Science Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Anaconda Business2.6%
IBM SPSS Statistics4.0%
Other93.4%
Data Science Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2775498 - PeerSpot reviewer
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Isolate environments and switch package versions efficiently for smoother testing workflows
Overall, it works well, but there are a few things that could be better. Sometimes the environment creation or package installation feels a bit slow, especially with bigger libraries. Another thing I would appreciate is a cleaner, more intuitive interface for managing environments. It works, but a smoother UI could make the workflow faster. It would also be nice to have clearer error messages when something fails, so it is easier to understand what went wrong without digging too much. The documentation could be a bit clearer, especially for troubleshooting specific errors or setup issues. Sometimes I need to search extensively to find the exact steps. Also, having quicker or more detailed support responses would help when something unexpected comes up. These are not major problems, but improving them would definitely make the overall experience smoother. One small improvement I would add is smoother integration with IDEs. It works fine right now, but having even tighter or more automated syncing with tools such as VS Code or PyCharm would make the workflow faster. Perhaps also a few more built-in examples or quick-start guides for common setups would be helpful. Nothing major, just things that would make the experience even more user-friendly.
EzzAbdelfattah - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Professor Of Statistics at a university with 10,001+ employees
Advanced predictive analytics have supported my research and student projects across many methods
The only function I may need to be added or hope to be added to IBM SPSS Statistics is how to treat unstructured data. This mainly exists with IBM SPSS Modeler, but I do not think it is able to treat something like videos and similar content unless you are using languages like Python inside IBM SPSS Modeler or inside IBM SPSS Statistics. For the menu itself, for the selection, it does not exist. Thinking of the future, I believe that the owners of IBM SPSS Statistics should think about improving the package itself to be able to treat unstructured data.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
University
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise19
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Anaconda?
The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anaconda?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a little costly, but it is useful.
What needs improvement with Anaconda?
I am still becoming familiar with Anaconda Business tools after using them for only two years, so I am not utilizing Anaconda Business extensively in data analysis and data science projects yet. I ...
What do you like most about IBM SPSS Statistics?
The software offers consistency across multiple research projects helping us with predictive analytics capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM SPSS Statistics?
I think the price of the solution is very reasonable. The cost depends; you have the option for subscription or you can purchase the license. Most of our customers are paying every year for a type ...
What needs improvement with IBM SPSS Statistics?
I have faced some challenges with IBM SPSS Statistics; you need to know what you're doing because it's not very user-friendly. It's not something a person can come and intuitively work with. The ba...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SPSS Statistics
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LinkedIn, NASA, Boeing, JP Morgan, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, DARPA, Microsoft, Amazon, HP, Cisco, Thomson Reuters, IBM, Bridgestone
LDB Group, RightShip, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Capgemini Consulting, TEAC Corporation, Ironside, nViso SA, Razorsight, Si.mobil, University Hospitals of Leicester, CROOZ Inc., GFS Fundraising Solutions, Nedbank Ltd., IDS-TILDA
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaconda Business vs. IBM SPSS Statistics and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.