Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes comparison

Anritsu and Teledyne LeCroy are both solutions in the Oscilloscopes category. Anritsu is ranked #8, while Teledyne LeCroy is ranked #5. Anritsu holds a 0.7% mindshare in O, compared to Teledyne LeCroy’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Anritsu users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Teledyne LeCroy users who would recommend it.

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Read 6 Anritsu Oscilloscopes reviews

274 Views
121 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Read 5 Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes reviews

1,505 Views
1,159 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anritsu Oscilloscopes and Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Oscilloscopes solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Ranking in Oscilloscopes

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Ranking in Oscilloscopes

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Oscilloscopes category, the mindshare of Anritsu Oscilloscopes is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes is 7.1%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Oscilloscopes

Featured Reviews

Reydezel Torres

Researcher at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees

We use it to decide the materials which are best for PCB designs

We are able to determine losses associated with different types of materials. Thus, we are able to decide the materials which are best for any given design. The electrical measurements that this equipment is capable of measuring are the standard parameters. Therefore, it is mandatory for each company to have a vector network analyzer (VNA).

Read full review

Packagine420

Packaging R&D Engineer at Intel Corporation

We are able to capture the transient domain accurately. I would like them to add more post processing capabilities.

It meet our basic needs. Since we do a lot of post processing when we download our waveforms to our computers, we need more post processing capabilities. If you have used oscilloscopes before, no matter the brand, it's probably easy to learn. The panel may be different, but it's easy to ramp up on the new model. This user interface is good. Most of the oscilloscopes that I have used have good user interfaces. The application space that we are using the solution to target is mostly high-speed signaling or memory interface. I would encourage people to use it and get some experience to see how they feel using it and how they like it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports the PAM-4 encoding scheme. We use that to do our PAM-4 receiver validation."

"We can extract signal loss, skew, DKDF... and the tool is very flexible."

"The jitter function included into the system has helped me in terms of improving the capabilities of our product."

"The user interface is easy, simple, and practical."

"The Pulse Pattern Generator (PPG) and Error Detector are co-located, which makes it easier to use because I can just probe it directly on the PCB."

"The most valuable feature is its frequency range."

"It gives you the capability to increase the Tap levels and voltage strength more than what you have in your signal."

"The most valuable feature is the embedded protocol analysis."

"It has a nice high-resolution screen. It is easy to set up the scope triggers, has a lot of scope trigger options for capturing waveforms, and seamlessly goes into the spectrum analysis mode."

"We are able to capture the transient domain accurately. There are some technical features where you can do FFT."

"We heavily use it to validate the design assumption. In many cases, it was able to point out things that were not available to us in simulation."

"Checking how many errors were on the channel by using the protocol analyzer has helped me to improve my design on PCIe PETracers."

Cons

"The user interface is a bit complicated because they have so many tabs. If they could simplify it, this would be helpful and appreciated."

"I would like the frequency range to be extended because of the speed. Electronics are moving forward to higher speeds, so it's better to have higher frequencies."

"Sometimes, the forms keep changing because of new product technology. If they could reduce the amount of change in the form, this would be good."

"I would like to see them improve the software. The new version can be improved. It's not quite stable. It restarts a lot."

"Right now, it's a minimal tool. They could make it more dynamic by adding dynamic features, which could help us with doing effective analysis."

"I would like a better GUI with navigation. This should make it easier to compare to competitors, like Textronix or Keysight."

"The product's antennas and radar applications need improvement."

"I would like more technical details on what each packet represents and more information on the flow."

"They could always work on the software stability of the products, particularly now that everything has switched over to a Windows-based interface. It creates a lot of crashes and bugs, which typically is a problem among all instruments."

"The interconnect methods to the device are a little limited right now. I'd like to see other ways of being able to connect to the device."

"Since we do a lot of post processing when we download our waveforms to our computers, we need more post processing capabilities."

"I would like them to be current with the latest standards. So, as soon as a new standard comes in, ensure that it gets rolled into the existing software."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think everyone gets a demo before purchasing."

"It is expensive, but I guess that is why it works."

"The first version of the product is always expensive, then once there is competition, it will be cheaper."

"The pricing is costly."

"It's very expensive equipment and cannot be upgraded after five years. If you buy equipment today, in five years, it won't be upgradeable. You have to upgrade it within the first five years that you buy it."

"Pricing is always expensive. It would be better if they lowered the price."

"Price-wise, it is much cheaper than its competitors."

"I would like them to include a lot of the add-on options as part of the package. Typically, we start in at a price, and by the time we add up all the options that we need which are available, we are at double or triple the original price."

"The bandwidth is pretty expensive on these instruments, so we typically use it all."

"They're fairly competitive for pricing across the industry."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Oscilloscopes solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

20%

Legal Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

20%

University

11%

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Keysight Oscilloscopes vs Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Compared 100% of the time

More Anritsu Oscilloscopes Competitors

Siglent vs Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Compared 35% of the time

Tektronix Oscilloscopes vs Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Compared 26% of the time

Keysight Oscilloscopes vs Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Compared 18% of the time

Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes vs Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Compared 9% of the time

RIGOL Oscilloscopes vs Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Compared 9% of the time

More Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oscilloscopes

March 2025

Download Anritsu Oscilloscopes product report

Buyer's Guide

Oscilloscopes

March 2025

Download Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes product report

Also Known As

BERTWave Series

WaveSurfer Series, HDO Series

Overview

Anritsu sampling oscilloscope is an ideal solution for Eye pattern analyses and Eye Mask tests. In addition, The excellent performance and high sampling speed reduce measurement times and help hold-down equipment costs.

Anritsu

Teledyne LeCroy's oscilloscopes offer a powerful combination of large and informative displays combined with advanced waveshape analysis capabilities - typically tailored to enhance the productivity of engineers in specific applications areas such as serial data test, disk drive test and automotive bus analysis.

Teledyne LeCroy

Buyer's Guide

Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

March 2025

Free Report: Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Find out what your peers are saying about Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes report.

See our list of best Oscilloscopes vendors.

We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.