Apache Hadoop vs SAP BW4HANA comparison

Apache and SAP are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.9, while SAP is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6. Apache holds a 5.0% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to SAP’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Apache Hadoop

Read 40 Apache Hadoop reviews

1,323 Views
1,068 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SAP BW4HANA

Read 42 SAP BW4HANA reviews

1,345 Views
909 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Apache Hadoop

SAP BW4HANA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Apache Hadoop and SAP BW4HANA are prominent data management platforms competing in big data and analytics. Apache Hadoop boasts cost efficiency and open-source flexibility, which gives it an edge for organizations managing extensive datasets. However, SAP BW4HANA’s robust analytics and integration capabilities often justify its higher cost for users seeking comprehensive solutions.

Features: Apache Hadoop thrives in storage and processing through its distributed file system, HDFS, which efficiently manages large data types including video, pictures, JSON, XML, and plain text. It is scalable and supports various data types, making it a preferred cost-effective choice for big data tasks. Conversely, SAP BW4HANA excels in analytics and visualization with an architecture tailored for seamless ERP integration and extensive reporting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Apache Hadoop faces criticism for its complexity and lack of a user-friendly interface, with users advocating for enhanced performance speed and easier integration for real-time analytics. Conversely, SAP BW4HANA's primary drawbacks include its high cost and limited customization options, with users calling for better third-party tool integration and adjustments in licensing models to alleviate financial constraints.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Hadoop offers flexible deployment options, both on-premise and in the cloud, but relies on community forums and third-party vendors for support, being favorable to tech-savvy businesses. SAP BW4HANA primarily focuses on on-premise setups while expanding cloud capabilities, offering structured albeit pricier support options.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Hadoop’s open-source nature presents a budget-friendly option for companies capitalizing on large-scale data without traditional RDBMS constraints. In contrast, SAP BW4HANA is recognized for its expense, but many enterprises find the investment worthwhile given its advanced analytics and smooth integration with SAP environments, resulting in substantial ROI for properly equipped organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Hadoop vs. SAP BW4HANA Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Hadoop vs. SAP BW4HANA

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Hadoop

Ranking in Data Warehouse

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP BW4HANA

Ranking in Data Warehouse

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Apache Hadoop is 5.0%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP BW4HANA is 4.5%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

Sushil Arya

Software developer at Fiserv

Provides ease of integration with the IT workflow of a business

When working with Kafka, I saw that the data came in an incremental order. The incremental data processing part is still not very effective in Apache Hadoop. If the data is already there, it can be processed very effectively, especially if the data is coming in every second. If you want to know the location of some data every second, then such data is not processed effectively in Apache Hadoop. I can say that one of the features where improvements are required revolves around the licensing cost of the tool. If the tool can build some licensing structures in a pay-per-use manner, organizations can get the look and feel of Apache Hadoop. Apache Hadoop can offer a licensing structure of the product that can be seen as similar to how AWS operates. Apache Hadoop can look into the capability of processing incremental data. The tool's setup process can be a scope of improvement. Also, it is not very simple because while doing the setup, we need to do all the server settings, including port listing and firewall configurations. If we look at other products on the market, then they can be made simpler. There are certain shortcomings when it comes to the product's technical support part, making it an area where improvements are required. The time frame for the resolution is an area that needs to be improved. The overall communication part of the technical support team also needs improvement.

Read full review

Csaba Grünblatt

Senior Data, Data warehouse and BI/Analytics Architect at Techwave.

Performs all necessary data warehouse tasks and offers additional functionalities

SAP BW4HANA improved data reporting processes significantly. Performance on HANA database is good. Well-built data models ensure consistent and fast reporting. Reusable models enhance efficiency, even for SaaS services. In-memory computing, especially since HANA, has greatly improved performance in data analysis tasks. It eliminates the need for complex optimizations like creating indexes or aggregates. Queries that once took minutes now run in seconds, enabling real-time reporting, especially for SAP ECC on HANA. SAP BW4HANA's integration capabilities are streamlined with a simplified architecture and more virtual layers. You can directly load data into optimized layers, reducing the need for extra storage. The introduction of Open ODS Views allows for additional logic and master data inclusion, making integration faster and simpler. The learning curve for SAP BW4HANA is much faster now compared to ten years ago, thanks to abundant free resources like documentation, videos, blogs, and learning journeys provided by SAP. It is simpler to learn with these resources available compared to the past when you had to attend courses and rely on books. I would recommend SAP BW4HANA to users looking to implement it, especially if they want to keep their systems on-premise and already have SAP systems. Those with BW on HANA have two choices: BW4HANA or DataSphere, depending on their cloud strategy. If they are advanced in their cloud strategy and want to migrate off-premise, DataSphere is a good choice. However, for a robust solution on-premise or in a private cloud, BW4HANA is an excellent option. Overall, I would rate BW4HANA as a nine out of ten. It performs all necessary data warehouse tasks and offers additional functionalities. We use it traditionally, with complex transformations and models but with less emphasis on real-time processing and third-party sources.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability of Apache Hadoop is very good."

"Apache Hadoop can manage large amounts and volumes of data with relative ease, which is a feature that is beneficial."

"It's good for storing historical data and handling analytics on a huge amount of data."

"It's primarily open source. You can handle huge data volumes and create your own views, workflows, and tables. I can also use it for real-time data streaming."

"Two valuable features are its scalability and parallel processing. There are jobs that cannot be done unless you have massively parallel processing."

"Hadoop File System is compatible with almost all the query engines."

"Initially, with RDBMS alone, we had a lot of work and few servers running on-premise and on cloud for the PoC and incubation. With the use of Hadoop and ecosystem components and tools, and managing it in Amazon EC2, we have created a Big Data "lab" which helps us to centralize all our work and solutions into a single repository. This has cut down the time in terms of maintenance, development and, especially, data processing challenges."

"They have integrated other tools as well, like Power BI and Oracle BI, both on Azure, for reporting. Oracle BI is difficult to integrate."

More Apache Hadoop pros

"It's quite scalable."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"We like that it is an SAP product, so we can easily connect with the SAP ERP system."

"The processes are the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"We can get good visualization and less redundant data."

"The UI is completely new, beautiful, and user-friendly. There are some other helpful features like global filters and advanced tools. We can perform custom calculations easily From a technical perspective, the performance has been enhanced and optimized for a limited number of flows. The content settings are more advanced, and there are so many other features that I can't name them all."

"It is a stable solution."

"SAP BW4HANA aids in managing data from ER to front-end analysis, contributes to ROI, and fosters business growth understanding. I like that the solution breaks down components to a very granular level, allowing for customization and implementation based on specific requirements. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable."

More SAP BW4HANA pros

Cons

"The upgrade path should be improved because it is not as easy as it should be."

"What could be improved in Apache Hadoop is its user-friendliness. It's not that user-friendly, but maybe it's because I'm new to it. Sometimes it feels so tough to use, but it could be because of two aspects: one is my incompetency, for example, I don't know about all the features of Apache Hadoop, or maybe it's because of the limitations of the platform. For example, my team is maintaining the business glossary in Apache Atlas, but if you want to change any settings at the GUI level, an advanced level of coding or programming needs to be done in the back end, so it's not user-friendly."

"Hadoop lacks OLAP capabilities."

"General installation/dependency issues were there, but were not a major, complex issue. While migrating data from MySQL to Hive, things are a little challenging, but we were able to get through that with support from forums and a little trial and error."

"I would like to see more direct integration of visualization applications."

"I mentioned it definitely, and this is probably the only feature we can improve a little bit because the terminal and coding screen on Hadoop is a little outdated, and it looks like the old C++ bio screen. If the UI and UX can be improved slightly, I believe it will go a long way toward increasing adoption and effectiveness."

"Real-time data processing is weak. This solution is very difficult to run and implement."

"The solution needs a better tutorial. There are only documents available currently. There's a lot of YouTube videos available. However, in terms of learning, we didn't have great success trying to learn that way. There needs to be better self-paced learning."

More Apache Hadoop cons

"The UI is not user-friendly."

"The speed of operations could be a little faster."

"SAP BW/4HANA can generally be less flexible than other tools, depending on how it is set up."

"It's complicated to use. You need to spend a lot of time learning about it. The interface could be improved. It's not intuitive to build a data model and use their ETL tools."

"The solution is not easy to implement. It requires a lot of learning at the beginning."

"We cannot integrate with third-party tools like Python or advanced integration options. You can't fine-tune tables within BW or generate specific views or reports."

"The monitoring for the remodeling feature is very difficult to understand."

"The licensing cost could be made better."

More SAP BW4HANA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no licensing costs involved, hence money is saved on the software infrastructure."

"The product is open-source, but some associated licensing fees depend on the subscription level."

"We don't directly pay for it. Our clients pay for it, and they usually don't complain about the price. So, it is probably acceptable."

"This is a low cost and powerful solution."

"We just use the free version."

"For any big enterprise the costs can be handled, and it is suitable for big enterprises because the scale of data is large. For medium and small enterprises, the tool is on the high-price side."

"The price of Apache Hadoop could be less expensive."

"If my company can use the cloud version of Apache Hadoop, particularly the cloud storage feature, it would be easier and would cost less because an on-premises deployment has a higher cost during storage, for example, though I don't know exactly how much Apache Hadoop costs."

More Apache Hadoop pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive product."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost of ownership is higher. It's resource-intensive, and naturally, that increases costs."

"For some, the rates offered by SAP can be costly while for others it may seem cheap. The price ultimately depends on how you have negotiated your contract with SAP."

"It's a little expensive compared to Microsoft Azure."

"We started as early birds from the SAP side. We got this entire suite for free. I cannot really talk about the price because we didn't have to pay anything."

"The cost and licensing depends on how the customer is going to use the solution."

"Price wise, this solution is on the higher side."

More SAP BW4HANA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Hadoop?

It's primarily open source. You can handle huge data volumes and create your own views, workflows, and tables. I can also use it for real-time data streaming.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Hadoop?

The product is open-source, but some associated licensing fees depend on the subscription level. While it might be free for students, organizations typically need to pay for their subscriptions. Th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Hadoop?

Hadoop lacks OLAP capabilities. I recommend adding a Delta Lake feature to make the data compatible with ACID properties. Also, video and audio streaming import issues could be improved to ensure p...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP BW4HANA?

One significant advantage of SAP BW/4HANA is the direct integration with the SAP HANA database, providing seamless access to real-time analytics. Additionally, it enables real-time data integrati...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP BW4HANA?

We have a broad licensing arrangement, which is expensive but worth it for sizeable businesses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP BW4HANA?

The interface could be more user-friendly, as we often need to do low-level coding to get things done.

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Exadata vs Apache Hadoop

Compared 22% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Apache Hadoop

Compared 13% of the time

Teradata vs Apache Hadoop

Compared 13% of the time

BigQuery vs Apache Hadoop

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics vs Apache Hadoop

Compared 8% of the time

More Apache Hadoop Competitors

Snowflake vs SAP BW4HANA

Compared 32% of the time

Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics vs SAP BW4HANA

Compared 29% of the time

Amazon Redshift vs SAP BW4HANA

Compared 9% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP BW4HANA

Compared 8% of the time

SAP HANA vs SAP BW4HANA

Compared 8% of the time

More SAP BW4HANA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Hadoop

March 2025

Download Apache Hadoop product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP BW4HANA

March 2025

Download SAP BW4HANA product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP BW/4HANA

Overview

The Apache Hadoop project develops open-source software for reliable, scalable, distributed computing. The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage. Rather than rely on hardware to deliver high-availability, the library itself is designed to detect and handle failures at the application layer, so delivering a highly-available service on top of a cluster of computers, each of which may be prone to failures.

Apache

SAP BW4HANA is a data warehouse solution developed by SAP for businesses looking to analyze big data in real time. It is designed to run on the SAP HANA database, offering improved performance and optimized processing of large data sets. SAP BW/4HANA provides an array of advanced analytics capabilities, including predictive analytics, text analytics, and spatial data processing. It also offers a modern, intuitive user interface and streamlined data modeling and administration tools, making it easier for businesses to access, manage, and utilize their data.

SAP BW4HANA Features

SAP BW4HANA has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

In-memory data processing: The solution runs on the SAP HANA database, providing fast and efficient data processing.

Advanced analytics: SAP BW4HANA includes capabilities for predictive analytics, text analytics, and spatial data processing.

Data modeling and administration: The solution provides streamlined data modeling and administration tools for efficient data management.

Modern user interface: SAP BW4HAN is designed with a modern, intuitive user interface for easier data access and analysis.

Data warehousing optimization: The solution is optimized for big data warehousing, offering improved performance and scalability.

Integration with SAP ecosystem: SAP BW4HAN integrates with the SAP ecosystem, including SAP S/4HANA and SAP Cloud Platform, for seamless data exchange.

Real-time data processing: It supports real-time data processing and analysis, enabling businesses to make data-driven decisions.

Data governance and security: With its robust data governance and security features, SAP BW4HAN can be used for secure data management and compliance.

Automated data loading: SAP BW4HAN supports automated data loading from various sources, including SAP and non-SAP systems.

Advanced data visualization: With its advanced data visualization capabilities, users can generate better data insights and make more informed business decisions.

SAP BW4HANA Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing SAP BW4HANA. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Improved data processing speed: Running on the SAP HANA database, SAP BW/4HANA provides fast and efficient data processing, resulting in improved performance and reduced downtime.

Streamlined data management: The solution's streamlined data modeling and administration tools make it easier for organizations to manage their data, improving overall efficiency and reducing the risk of errors.

Improved data governance: SAP BW/4HANA includes robust data governance and security features, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements and protect sensitive data.

Cost savings: By optimizing data warehousing processes, SAP BW/4HANA helps organizations reduce costs and improve their bottom line.

Reviews from Real Users

SAP BW4HANA is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are its hierarchical alert slicing, real-time insights, and its ability to transform large amounts of data.

PeerSpot reviewer, Srivatsav A., SAP BW/4HANA Specialist at a government, is very happy with the solution. He explains, "You can do hierarchical alert slicing and dicing out-of-box, which is not available in other solutions. I haven't come across that in Oracle or any other software provider."

“It has got wonderful features in terms of analyzing your production data, and it gives you real-time insight into productive maintenance. You can plan your budget, and you can map them against actuals. It gives you good insights on overall performance and processes,” says Amrit J., ERP Application Manager at an energy/utilities company.

In addition, a Technology Analyst at a tech services company mentions, "The most valuable feature is that we can transform a huge amount of data and apply business logic as per the requirements."

SAP

Sample Customers

Amazon, Adobe, eBay, Facebook, Google, Hulu, IBM, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Spotify, AOL, Twitter, University of Maryland, Yahoo!, Cornell University Web Lab

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Apache Hadoop vs. SAP BW4HANA

March 2025

Free Report: Apache Hadoop vs. SAP BW4HANA

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Hadoop vs. SAP BW4HANA and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Hadoop vs. SAP BW4HANA report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.