Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache NiFi vs Google Cloud Dataflow comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache NiFi
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Compute Service (8th)
Google Cloud Dataflow
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Apache NiFi and Google Cloud Dataflow aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Apache NiFi is designed for Compute Service and holds a mindshare of 7.8%, up 6.9% compared to last year.
Google Cloud Dataflow, on the other hand, focuses on Streaming Analytics, holds 7.4% mindshare, up 6.9% since last year.
Compute Service
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Bharghava Raghavendra Beesa - PeerSpot reviewer
The tool enables effective data transformation and integration
There are some areas for improvement, particularly with record-level tasks that take a bit of time. The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process. Enhancing features related to alerting would be helpful, including mobile alerts for pipeline issues. Integration with mobile devices for error alerts would simplify information delivery.
Jana Polianskaja - PeerSpot reviewer
Build Scalable Data Pipelines with Apache Beam and Google Cloud Dataflow
As a data engineer, I find several features of Google Cloud Dataflow particularly valuable. The ability to test solutions locally using Direct Runner is crucial for development, allowing me to validate pipelines without incurring the costs of full Dataflow jobs. The unified programming model for both batch and streaming processing is exceptional - requiring only minor code adjustments to optimize for either mode. This flexibility extends to language support, with robust implementations in both Java and Python, allowing teams to leverage their existing expertise. The platform's comprehensive monitoring capabilities are another standout feature. The intuitive interface, Grafana integration, and extensive service connectivity make troubleshooting and performance tracking highly efficient. Furthermore, seamless integration with Google Cloud Composer (managed Airflow) enables sophisticated orchestration of data pipelines.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Apache NiFi is user-friendly. Its most valuable features for handling large volumes of data include its multitude of integrated endpoints and clients and the ability to create cron jobs to run tasks at regular intervals."
"The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy."
"It is highly effective for handling real-time data by working with APIs for immediate and continuous data extraction."
"We can integrate the tool with other applications easily."
"Visually, this is a good product."
"The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use."
"The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation."
"The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows."
"The solution allows us to program in any language we desire."
"The service is relatively cheap compared to other batch-processing engines."
"The best feature of Google Cloud Dataflow is its practical connectedness."
"I would rate the overall solution a ten out of ten."
"I don't need a server running all the time while using the tool. It is also easy to setup. The product offers a pay-as-you-go service."
"The integration within Google Cloud Platform is very good."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Dataflow are scalability and connectivity."
 

Cons

"More features must be added to the product."
"The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing."
"There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible."
"There should be a better way to integrate a development environment with local tools."
"There are some claims that NiFi is cloud-native but we have tested it, and it's not."
"We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved."
"I think the UI interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"The tool should incorporate more tutorials for advanced use cases. It has tutorials for simple use cases."
"The technical support has slight room for improvement."
"The solution's setup process could be more accessible."
"Promoting the technology more broadly would help increase its adoption."
"When I deploy the product in local errors, a lot of errors pop up which are not always caught. The solution's error logging is bad. It can take a lot of time to debug the errors. It needs to have better logs."
"The authentication part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Google Cloud Dataflow should include a little cost optimization."
"They should do a market survey and then make improvements."
"I would like Google Cloud Dataflow to be integrated with IT data flow and other related services to make it easier to use as it is a complex tool."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I used the tool's free version."
"We use the free version of Apache NiFi."
"It's an open-source solution."
"The solution is open-source."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Google Cloud Dataflow's pricing a four out of ten."
"The solution is not very expensive."
"The price of the solution depends on many factors, such as how they pay for tools in the company and its size."
"Google Cloud Dataflow is a cheap solution."
"Google Cloud is slightly cheaper than AWS."
"The tool is cheap."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven to eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
842,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Retailer
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?
There are some areas for improvement, particularly with record-level tasks that take a bit of time. The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversio...
What do you like most about Google Cloud Dataflow?
The product's installation process is easy...The tool's maintenance part is somewhat easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Dataflow?
Google Cloud Dataflow costs are primarily driven by compute resources (worker type and count) and data volume. However, other factors like pipeline complexity also contribute significantly to the t...
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Dataflow?
Apache Beam represents a powerful data processing solution that deserves wider recognition in the broader tech community. This technology offers remarkable capabilities for handling data at scale, ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Google Dataflow
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group
Absolutdata, Backflip Studios, Bluecore, Claritics, Crystalloids, Energyworx, GenieConnect, Leanplum, Nomanini, Redbus, Streak, TabTale
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Spot by NetApp and others in Compute Service. Updated: February 2025.
842,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.