Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache NiFi vs Oracle Compute Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache NiFi
Ranking in Compute Service
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Compute Cloud Service
Ranking in Compute Service
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Apache NiFi is 8.0%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Compute Cloud Service is 2.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Compute Service
 

Featured Reviews

SabinaZeynalova - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows the creation and use of custom functions to achieve desired functionality but limitation in handling monthly transactions due to a lack of partitioning for dates
Apache NiFi is slow to control and needs to be improved. I have to run many jobs and there are already large tables, which can make it difficult to control NiFi on time. There is no one to tell me when there is an incident and my server is down. When we manually start the NiFi process, it is not always started correctly. We can write scripts to run when a message is received from Airflow saying that the firewall is not running. This script will automatically start all servers, including the application servers. It will also check the status of all my NiFi processes and send a callback message with the results. I have written down all the processes that are monitored. We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved. In future releases, there are extra features I’d like to add. For example, NiFi is not suitable for migration, and the replication in NiFi is really not good. Because when you process ten years of data, you can't manage all the transactions; it is not enough. Moreover, the handling of monthly transactions is not enough due to a lack of partitioning for dates. And, when we grade a monthly ticket, we must process all data then rerun our ETL jobs. If it's possible, enhancing the partitioning in NiFi for features would be beneficial.
Use Oracle Compute Cloud Service?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?
The tool should incorporate more tutorials for advanced use cases. It has tutorials for simple use cases.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group
LogOn Consulting, Molecular Dynamics
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Spot by NetApp and others in Compute Service. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.