Apache Web Server vs IBM DataPower Gateway comparison

Apache and IBM are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2. Apache holds a 8.5% mindshare in AIS, compared to IBM’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 24 Apache Web Server reviews

2,456 Views
2,431 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM DataPower Gateway

Read 32 IBM DataPower Gateway reviews

7,084 Views
1,133 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

IBM DataPower Gateway

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

IBM DataPower Gateway and Apache Web Server vie in the web and data security market. IBM DataPower Gateway distinguishes itself with advanced security, combining encryption, threat protection, and API management, giving it an edge in security-focused enterprises. Apache Web Server, on the other hand, excels in cost-effectiveness and modular flexibility, preferred by those seeking a versatile solution.

Features: IBM DataPower Gateway offers encryption, threat protection, and comprehensive API management, aligning well with enterprise-level requirements. Apache Web Server provides a modular architecture, extensive customizability, and efficient client request handling, appealing to varied operational needs.

Room for Improvement: IBM DataPower Gateway could enhance usability and reduce complexity in deployment, while Apache might benefit from improved enterprise-level support and richer commercial features. DataPower could also explore cost-effective solutions to widen its market appeal. Apache Web Server needs enhancements in user interface and ease of management for large-scale deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM DataPower Gateway necessitates skilled personnel for deployment, supported by enterprise-grade customer service. Apache Web Server's open-source foundation ensures simpler installation and management, although it primarily relies on community-based support for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: IBM DataPower Gateway incurs higher initial costs, but its features promise substantial ROI through performance gains. Apache Web Server offers economical deployment with negligible recurring costs, delivering formidable ROI through its adaptability and community-driven advancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. IBM DataPower Gateway Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. IBM DataPower Gateway

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,868 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM DataPower Gateway

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (4th), SOA Application Gateways (1st), API Management (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 8.5%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM DataPower Gateway is 3.9%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Web Server	8.5%
IBM DataPower Gateway	3.9%
Other	87.6%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

AkshaySawant

Manager at CSB Bank Ltd

Security features excel but development limitations emerge

We are using the IBM DataPower Gateway for security purposes. As per the development perspective, there are some limitations with IBM DataPower Gateway because it only supports XML and XSLT language, but it does not support the Java language. This is the only limitation of the IBM DataPower Gateway. For the authentication and authorization purpose, we can use the IBM DataPower Gateway. It's a very good product. We are mostly using the IBM DataPower Gateway for security purposes and load balancing purposes. If we are handling the load for a particular server, then we can use the IBM DataPower Gateway. The IBM DataPower Gateway is mostly used for security purposes. If we have some APIs and we are using some security for those APIs, then we can use it. It can also be used as a load balancer. It's also used for certificate management, user management purposes, authentication, and authorization. For routing, the IBM DataPower Gateway has multiple URL-based routing and content-based routing capabilities. If we have multiple URLs, then we can use an XML script. Using the XSLT language, we can configure multiple URLs and implement URL-based routing. Content-based routing means if we have multiple requests, we can route the request to a particular URL. For this, we need to use the XSLT language only. We can't use XML, Java, or other scripting languages. With IBM DataPower Gateway, we are using all the APIs. All APIs have been configured on the gateway. We have configured the particular TLS profile and some TLS client profiles as well. Using that TLS profile, we have configured the APIs and authentication. We have configured some tokens also, including JWT tokens and different types of auth tokens. There is also a rate limiting feature which we use for handling API loads.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I do find some benefits with Nginx."

"It's very stable, and it hosts one of the biggest of many biggest web applications in the world."

"The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions."

"Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"Apache Web Server can be used as a proxy server"

"In my experience, Apache Web Server has been a good and stable solution."

"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."

More Apache Web Server pros

"I like the API Gateway feature."

"The most valuable feature is the security appliance, it's very secure."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the appliance hardware, the software embedded within the hardware appliance machine, making it one of the best security platforms in the market that is easy to use, easy to install, and resilient for high availability."

"We are mostly using the IBM DataPower Gateway for security purposes and load balancing purposes."

"The scalability of the solution is good."

"The most valuable features for our business include the ability to monitor and log data transactions and handle multiple request at an enterprise level."

"The solution is robust, and we use the appliance version, which comes with good security features and troubleshooting tools, so we are happy with IBM DataPower."

"The advantages of IBM DataPower Gateway, which I personally appreciate, are the security features that you can manipulate according to your company policies."

More IBM DataPower Gateway pros

Cons

"A monitoring interface would be great for this product. The monitoring dashboards for Apache's models are not included in the basic installation. You can install the basic monitoring model, then connect this model to another monitoring system."

"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."

"If Apache master the ability of hosting websites/web apps that use Microsoft's .Net framework then it will definitely be the best web server to use."

"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."

"Adding a reverse proxy to Apache Web Server would be a significant improvement."

"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."

"I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and fast enough in edge cases without crashing under too much traffic during spikes."

"So far, for us, everything is okay."

More Apache Web Server cons

"Small and medium-sized companies might look for cloud-hosted applications due to the cost."

"Some pre-packaged connectors for integration with various applications, such as SaaS offerings, would be a useful addition."

"The components that they include in the product that are, in fact, a WTX, really need to be removed from the product because they tend to fail."

"Its support services could be better."

"The programming language is only supported in XSLT and Gateway script."

"The user interface or the application development perspective and customization of the tool could be a little better."

"I would like the tool to improve its training."

"The two biggest issues of this solution are the complexity and the maintenance procedures."

More IBM DataPower Gateway cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"It is an open-source solution."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"The tool's initial costing is expensive for small banks and financial institutions."

"The appliance is a bit on the expensive side for the workloads that are not too high."

"IBM DataPower Gateway is quite expensive to get resources to work on this product. If the price could be cheaper, I think that will make it a little bit better and easily accessible to smaller clients. Then it could compete with other solutions that are available in the market. There's a whole lot of other solutions available that work well and are cheaper than IBM's products."

"The solution has a return on investment but is a little expensive."

"Most customers' use case budgets are not inlined with the price of IBM DataPower Gateway. It is too expensive."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The total cost of IBM DataPower Gateway would depend on the configuration, but in my experience, it can amount to 60,000 Euros per box, even for the virtual version. Usually, customers need high availability and a non-production environment, so the total price for IBM DataPower Gateway can be quite a lot. It can be 200,000 Euros or a similar figure."

"The licensing cost is very expensive."

More IBM DataPower Gateway pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

29%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM DataPower Gateway?

The MPGW (Multi-Protocol Gateway) is great because it allows you to easily expose services using various protocols – web services, REST (JSON), and others. This flexibility simplifies things.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM DataPower Gateway?

I don't know if the current licensing cost of IBM DataPower Gateway is high, but I think it's acceptable. I don't have any complaints about it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM DataPower Gateway?

I noticed that the Gateway Script libraries could be improved, as they are not covering everything I need.

See all answers

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 20% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 17% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Windows Server AppFabric vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

WebLogic Suite vs Apache Web Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

IBM API Connect vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 30% of the time

Apigee vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 5% of the time

NGINX Plus vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM DataPower Gateway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

May 2026

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM DataPower Gateway

April 2026

Download IBM DataPower Gateway product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

WebSphere DataPower, IBM DataPower, IBM WebSphere DataPower

Overview

Apache Web Server is a stable, open-source platform known for its cost-effectiveness, multi-platform compatibility, ease of setup, and high security. It supports various web scripting languages and enables HTTPS services, making it a popular choice for many organizations.

Apache Web Server offers extensive features including HTTP server capabilities and modularity. It efficiently handles client requests and is highly flexible, which is why many companies utilize it for hosting applications, developing websites, and more. Community support further enhances its reliability, though improvements like integration with cloud systems such as Kubernetes, a simplified port management, and support for Microsoft's .Net framework are desired. Initial setup challenges exist, and enhanced security features and GUI updates would benefit less experienced users. Apache needs optimization for resource efficiency and compatibility with modern application architectures.

What are the most important features of Apache Web Server?

Open-Source: Apache is free and community-driven.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works on multiple operating systems.
Modular Architecture: Allows scalability and customization.
Secure: Supports HTTPS services and has WAF capabilities.
Performance: Efficiently handles client requests.

What benefits can users expect from using Apache Web Server?

Cost-Effective: No licensing fees associated.
High Reliability: Community support ensures stability.
Flexibility: Easily integrates with numerous frameworks.
Scalability: Modular design aids in scaling operations.
Community Support: Continuous updates and enhancements.

Apache Web Server is widely used across different industries such as financial sectors for hosting applications and core banking systems. Integrated with tools like JMeter and Tomcat, it is pivotal in deploying web servers and acting as a proxy for application servers. In cloud migrations, its open-source WAF features using ModSecurity are invaluable, and companies rely on its capabilities for managing threats and attacks through HTTP/HTTPS connections.

Apache

IBM DataPower Gateway provides advanced security, multi-protocol transformation, and API management, ensuring appliance-based stability and performance. It supports enterprise-level traffic, facilitating seamless integration and deployment, though it may pose challenges in terms of pricing and user complexity.

IBM DataPower Gateway integrates as an enterprise service bus and API management platform, effectively securing APIs and managing authentication and authorization. Serving large banks and enterprises, it supports B2B transactions with data security and compliance, especially for sectors requiring GDPR adherence. Users benefit from high performance and stability, despite its premium cost and complex configuration needs. Cloud integration, user-friendliness enhancements, and improved documentation are areas where it can advance. It meets the demands of sectors like BFSI by protecting against security threats and supporting significant traffic volumes.

What are key features of IBM DataPower Gateway?

Advanced security functionalities: Comprehensive tools for authentication, authorization, and certificate management.
Multi-protocol transformation: Facilitates seamless conversions across different protocols.
Appliance-based stability: Provides a stable platform for handling enterprise traffic.
API management: Capable of managing APIs efficiently with rate-limiting and other controls.
Efficient troubleshooting tools: Streamlines issue resolution and system maintenance.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

High performance: Capable of handling large-scale enterprise traffic efficiently.
Easy integration and configuration: Simplifies connecting with existing systems.
Regulatory compliance: Supports adherence to regulations like GDPR.
Protects against security threats: Offers robust security measures for data protection.

IBM DataPower Gateway is prominent in industries requiring rigorous data security and efficient integration, such as BFSI. Large enterprises leverage it for B2B transactions, ensuring regulatory compliance and high-performance standards. It's also implemented in environments demanding robust API security and management.

IBM

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

RBL Bank, Availity

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. IBM DataPower Gateway

April 2026

Free Report: Apache Web Server vs. IBM DataPower Gateway

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. IBM DataPower Gateway and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Web Server vs. IBM DataPower Gateway report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.