Apache Web Server vs Magic xpa Application Platform comparison

Apache and Magic Software are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Magic Software is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.0. Apache holds a 7.7% mindshare in AIS, compared to Magic Software’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Magic Software users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 24 Apache Web Server reviews

3,023 Views
2,993 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Magic xpa Application Platform

Read 10 Magic xpa Application Platform reviews

2,303 Views
1,059 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

Magic xpa Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Magic xpa Application Platform and Apache Web Server compete in development and web server domains, respectively. Apache Web Server holds an advantage with its extensive features and robust server capabilities.

Features: Magic xpa offers a high-productivity development environment, multi-channel application support, and seamless data integration. Apache Web Server is known for its secure, highly configurable, and performance-oriented web serving capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Magic xpa could enhance customizability, expand its feature set for better competition in diverse environments, and streamline advanced deployment options. Apache Web Server would benefit from simplifying its configuration process, enhancing direct customer support options, and further optimizing its documentation for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Magic xpa facilitates quick start-ups with a straightforward deployment model and comprehensive customer support. Apache Web Server, while requiring more technical expertise for deployment, offers community-based support that may lack the immediate guidance of Magic xpa's service.

Pricing and ROI: Magic xpa typically involves lower setup costs, delivering favorable ROI through efficient development. Apache Web Server, being open-source, has minimal direct setup costs but may incur expenses related to configurability and maintenance, often yielding significant long-term ROI in large-scale operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,147 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Magic xpa Application Platform

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (10th), Mobile Development Platforms (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 7.7%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Magic xpa Application Platform is 3.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Web Server	7.7%
Magic xpa Application Platform	3.1%
Other	89.2%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

Mylsamy T.

Senior Associate - IT at Himalaya Wellness Company

Enables us to develop more than 90 applications in-house, which are used across our organization

It's a bit difficult to work with purely web-based applications to get the data and display it. There have been a few times when the connection was disconnected between the server and your browser. The connectivity on browser-built applications needs to be improved. The mobile application development could be easier. They could include different external applications, like finger sensors. I'm not sure whether it's in version 3.8 or not.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache Web Server is freeware with no setup or licensing costs, yet it efficiently and stably runs our web applications in the cloud, including Java-based ones with Apache Tomcat and SSL for secure connectivity, providing substantial cost-savings for our organization."

"The solution offers good security."

"Depending on what operating system you are using, you can have a website up in no time using Apache web server."

"The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages."

"It's reliable, configurable and generally secure."

"The product is very cheap and stable."

"It is scalable."

"The Apache Web Server is our software of choice for running our web servers for the past seven (7) years."

More Apache Web Server pros

"Typically an experienced Magic developer can do the work of two to three experienced C#/.NET developers."

"What I found most valuable in the Magic xpa Application Platform is that it has a client-server and web browser technology that's perfect for company users."

"In spite of the solution's high cost, we see a very large return on our investment."

"Typically an experienced Magic developer can do the work of two to three experienced C#/.NET developers. Customers are amazed at how quickly most new features can be added and bug fixes implemented. I have worked for four employers - including myself - using Magic, and in most instances, bug fixes are addressed and deployed in under six hours."

"Magic’s unique approach to development ensures that the programmer stays focused on the objective of the program (i.e. display all customers in California), instead of the repetitive tasks that surround it (i.e. connect to database, open customers table, create the query to retrieve records within the specified criteria, fetch the result of the query, connect it to a data grid, etc.)."

"Magic is rapid, it's a tool which we use to develop, change and maintain our programs, and xpa has a lot more features onboard and it gives us the opportunity to do such things so that we can easily adapt and maintain our programs, giving us certain benefits to stay with our customers and the market."

"The ability to use the same development environment for both Windows and Android applications. Magic xpa also supports iOS applications."

"The best feature of Magic is the development time. The time it takes to develop something is incredibly fast if you compare Magic with, for example, Java."

More Magic xpa Application Platform pros

Cons

"With Apache, you can't update the system. There is a big gap between models. I don't like this."

"I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and fast enough in edge cases without crashing under too much traffic during spikes."

"The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience."

"You know what? I found negligible difference between Apache and Nginx."

"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."

"So far, for us, everything is okay."

"There isn't a dedicated customer support available"

"For NGINX, I think it has NGINX Management Suite, which is GUI-based and allows you to manage your configuration via the user interface, but Apache fails to offer such capabilities to users."

More Apache Web Server cons

"Throughout my career, I've encountered difficulties when integrating new technologies with Magic xpa Application Platform. In particular, when attempting to incorporate features from other development languages into earlier versions of the solution called uniPaaS. I struggled to integrate .NET components due to the limited options available. This made the process more challenging and complicated. I find it challenging to create a more user-friendly experience for users who may be comparing the system to other systems they have used outside or within the company on different platforms."

"The Android environment is missing a number of functions for file/folder manipulation, sending receiving text messages (SMS) and the menuing options are limited. For now, it is left to the developer to write his/her own Java functions to include in the APK."

"In the next version of the Magic xpa Application Platform, I want tables or small programs where I can directly add expressions. I can do it on SQL, but it would make life much easier if that specification were added to the platform."

"When you have several tasks, you open a screen in a task in developing mode, and you don't see the parent screens. Debugging lacks the effects to solve problems. You have to do it first in a kind of studio. Then you have to be sure that you can do it in Magic because there is almost nothing to debug it. It's practically impossible to debug. You have to be sure before you put your snippets."

"The configuration of the xpa RIA mobile environment is complex and a discouragement to new developers. Also, Magic's documentation can be less than complete at times which leads to frustration for new developers. (I encourage new Magic developers to join the Magic Users Group)."

"The company has now released version 4 for web development, but this new release is still pretty hard to use for mobile and web development because it was not improved as much as we expected in the areas of user-friendliness or development-friendliness."

"I would like to see a spell checker included with optional language support. Currently, this has to be purchased from a third-party."

"Support is very bad. The main focus is placed on their own customers, big banks and big insurance companies, so those, like us, who are independent software vendors, are ignored."

More Magic xpa Application Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"It is an open-source solution."

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"The main problem with the Magic xpa Application Platform is pricing. You have to pay a lot of money for development, and you also have to pay a lot for the deployments and runtime, while in most competitors, you have to pay a lot for one of the two and not both."

"My clients have to purchase additional licenses in order to use what I built. It's not a fair approach."

"The licensing cost varies because nowadays Magic has tailor-made offerings for clients. I think the solution is worth the money."

"The cost for developers is high because you have to pay for licenses as well as runtime."

"There are different licenses, we have the application and the online application. There are two different licenses for two different program sites for the Magic xpa Application Platform."

"The licensing is too costly."

"Magic is not the cheapest IDE out there. If you are considering Magic xpa, you should do a cost-benefit analysis to feel comfortable with your decision. The Magic sales staff is very helpful in providing pricing."

"It's not cheap. The licenses are not cheap. Not at all. They cost much money. There are other tools with free licenses but Magic asks for a lot of money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 17% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 15% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 7% of the time

Windows Server AppFabric vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

InterSystems Ensemble vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

Mendix vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 8% of the time

OutSystems vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Tomcat vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Uniface vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Magic xpa Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

July 2026

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Magic xpa Application Platform

June 2026

Download Magic xpa Application Platform product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

uniPaaS

Overview

Apache Web Server is a stable, open-source platform known for its cost-effectiveness, multi-platform compatibility, ease of setup, and high security. It supports various web scripting languages and enables HTTPS services, making it a popular choice for many organizations.

Apache Web Server offers extensive features including HTTP server capabilities and modularity. It efficiently handles client requests and is highly flexible, which is why many companies utilize it for hosting applications, developing websites, and more. Community support further enhances its reliability, though improvements like integration with cloud systems such as Kubernetes, a simplified port management, and support for Microsoft's .Net framework are desired. Initial setup challenges exist, and enhanced security features and GUI updates would benefit less experienced users. Apache needs optimization for resource efficiency and compatibility with modern application architectures.

What are the most important features of Apache Web Server?

Open-Source: Apache is free and community-driven.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works on multiple operating systems.
Modular Architecture: Allows scalability and customization.
Secure: Supports HTTPS services and has WAF capabilities.
Performance: Efficiently handles client requests.

What benefits can users expect from using Apache Web Server?

Cost-Effective: No licensing fees associated.
High Reliability: Community support ensures stability.
Flexibility: Easily integrates with numerous frameworks.
Scalability: Modular design aids in scaling operations.
Community Support: Continuous updates and enhancements.

Apache Web Server is widely used across different industries such as financial sectors for hosting applications and core banking systems. Integrated with tools like JMeter and Tomcat, it is pivotal in deploying web servers and acting as a proxy for application servers. In cloud migrations, its open-source WAF features using ModSecurity are invaluable, and companies rely on its capabilities for managing threats and attacks through HTTP/HTTPS connections.

Apache

Magic xpa Application Platform is known for its fast development speed and extensive platform support. It efficiently handles database operations and integrates well with systems like Oracle, supporting Windows, Android, and iOS applications.

Magic xpa Application Platform offers rapid development capabilities, robust database connectivity, and versatile platform support. It integrates seamlessly with systems like Oracle, uses in-memory databases efficiently, and offers flexibility in database operations. Updates and deployments are seamless across Windows, Android, and iOS. The platform facilitates web service communication, XML creation, and isolates database logic from application logic, allowing developers to concentrate on program objectives. Despite its outdated interface and expensive licensing, the platform struggles with mobile and web development integration and complex environments.

What are the key features of Magic xpa Application Platform?

Rapid Development: Accelerates application creation.
Robust Connectivity: Integrates with databases like Oracle.
Versatile Support: Compatible with Windows, Android, iOS.
Seamless Deployment: Simplifies update processes.
Web Service Communication: Eases XML and service interactions.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Magic xpa?

Efficiency: Enhances productivity with fast deployment.
Integration Capabilities: Connects effortlessly with existing systems.
Flexibility: Adapts to multiple operating systems and environments.
Focus: Allows developers to concentrate on main objectives.

In specific industries, Magic xpa Application Platform is utilized for various purposes like IoT support, police and emergency operations management, and ERP development for clients in diverse sectors. Retail billing, document management, HR solutions, healthcare data management, and financial systems leverage its ability to handle complex data exchanges and enable remote access. The platform's expansive application development supports efficient operations in healthcare, retail, and manufacturing.

Magic Software

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

ADD, Cape plc, Adecco, Kuno Kinzoku Industry Co., GE Capital, Dove Tree, CBS Outdoor, Paris-Nord Villepinte Exhibition Center, Allstate Life Insurance Company, Titan Software Systems

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform

June 2026

Free Report: Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.