Apache Web Server vs Magic xpa Application Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Apache and Magic Software are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Magic Software is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.0. Apache holds a 7.0% mindshare in AIS, compared to Magic Software’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Magic Software users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 24 Apache Web Server reviews

3,517 Views
3,482 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Magic xpa Application Platform

Read 10 Magic xpa Application Platform reviews

2,956 Views
1,419 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

Magic xpa Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Magic xpa Application Platform and Apache Web Server compete in development and web server domains, respectively. Apache Web Server holds an advantage with its extensive features and robust server capabilities.

Features: Magic xpa offers a high-productivity development environment, multi-channel application support, and seamless data integration. Apache Web Server is known for its secure, highly configurable, and performance-oriented web serving capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Magic xpa could enhance customizability, expand its feature set for better competition in diverse environments, and streamline advanced deployment options. Apache Web Server would benefit from simplifying its configuration process, enhancing direct customer support options, and further optimizing its documentation for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Magic xpa facilitates quick start-ups with a straightforward deployment model and comprehensive customer support. Apache Web Server, while requiring more technical expertise for deployment, offers community-based support that may lack the immediate guidance of Magic xpa's service.

Pricing and ROI: Magic xpa typically involves lower setup costs, delivering favorable ROI through efficient development. Apache Web Server, being open-source, has minimal direct setup costs but may incur expenses related to configurability and maintenance, often yielding significant long-term ROI in large-scale operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,952 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Magic xpa Application Platform

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (10th), Mobile Development Platforms (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 7.0%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Magic xpa Application Platform is 3.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Web Server	7.0%
Magic xpa Application Platform	3.5%
Other	89.5%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

Mylsamy T.

Senior Associate - IT at Himalaya Wellness Company

Enables us to develop more than 90 applications in-house, which are used across our organization

It's a bit difficult to work with purely web-based applications to get the data and display it. There have been a few times when the connection was disconnected between the server and your browser. The connectivity on browser-built applications needs to be improved. The mobile application development could be easier. They could include different external applications, like finger sensors. I'm not sure whether it's in version 3.8 or not.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache Web Server is freeware with no setup or licensing costs, yet it efficiently and stably runs our web applications in the cloud, including Java-based ones with Apache Tomcat and SSL for secure connectivity, providing substantial cost-savings for our organization."

"The Apache Web Server is our software of choice for running our web servers for the past seven (7) years."

"Its community is its most valuable feature, and solving problems is easier on Apache because so many people know this product."

"It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services."

"It's very stable, and it hosts one of the biggest of many biggest web applications in the world."

"In my experience, Apache Web Server has been a good and stable solution."

"I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server; you can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it."

"The product is very cheap and stable."

More Apache Web Server pros

"Without the need to compile code, the time spent in the development cycle is greatly reduced, allowing the programmer to test modifications to a program immediately after they have been saved."

"My employees can develop and deploy something in a matter of hours."

"Typically an experienced Magic developer can do the work of two to three experienced C#/.NET developers."

"Magic’s unique approach to development ensures that the programmer stays focused on the objective of the program (i.e. display all customers in California), instead of the repetitive tasks that surround it (i.e. connect to database, open customers table, create the query to retrieve records within the specified criteria, fetch the result of the query, connect it to a data grid, etc.)."

"The ability to use the same development environment for both Windows and Android applications. Magic xpa also supports iOS applications."

"Magic’s Database Gateway allows the logic of the program to be isolated from the underlying database. This provides the flexibility not only to move existing programs to different database environments without the need to change the logic in the program but also allows the programmer access to different databases without the need to know how to "talk" to them."

"What I found most valuable in the Magic xpa Application Platform is that it has a client-server and web browser technology that's perfect for company users."

"Typically an experienced Magic developer can do the work of two to three experienced C#/.NET developers. Customers are amazed at how quickly most new features can be added and bug fixes implemented. I have worked for four employers - including myself - using Magic, and in most instances, bug fixes are addressed and deployed in under six hours."

More Magic xpa Application Platform pros

Cons

"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."

"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."

"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."

"No support is available from Apache software foundation."

"There isn't a dedicated customer support available"

"Its stability could be better."

"With Apache, you can't update the system. There is a big gap between models. I don't like this."

"Regarding advice, there is a security-related problem that depends on the web server's configuration."

More Apache Web Server cons

"Throughout my career, I've encountered difficulties when integrating new technologies with Magic xpa Application Platform. In particular, when attempting to incorporate features from other development languages into earlier versions of the solution called uniPaaS. I struggled to integrate .NET components due to the limited options available. This made the process more challenging and complicated. I find it challenging to create a more user-friendly experience for users who may be comparing the system to other systems they have used outside or within the company on different platforms."

"There is room for improvement in Magic's marketing and licensing. I would like to see more integration of web functionality."

"Support is very bad. The main focus is placed on their own customers, big banks and big insurance companies, so those, like us, who are independent software vendors, are ignored."

"Debugging .NET snippets is not possible, so it lacks the effects to solve problems. First you have to write and test your .NET code in VS, then you have to copy the .NET code in Magic xpa because there is almost nothing to debug it."

"The company has now released version 4 for web development, but this new release is still pretty hard to use for mobile and web development because it was not improved as much as we expected in the areas of user-friendliness or development-friendliness."

"The Android environment is missing a number of functions for file/folder manipulation, sending receiving text messages (SMS) and the menuing options are limited. For now, it is left to the developer to write his/her own Java functions to include in the APK."

"Magic has a tradition, when it adds new technologies/features to the Magic development tool, to provide either no documentation or documentation that does not provide an organized approach for bringing this new technology/feature to experienced Magic programmers."

"The ability to display page up, page down, top and bottom buttons along the scroll bar would make my mouse-reliant customers happy."

More Magic xpa Application Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source solution."

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"The main problem with the Magic xpa Application Platform is pricing. You have to pay a lot of money for development, and you also have to pay a lot for the deployments and runtime, while in most competitors, you have to pay a lot for one of the two and not both."

"The licensing is too costly."

"The licensing cost varies because nowadays Magic has tailor-made offerings for clients. I think the solution is worth the money."

"There are different licenses, we have the application and the online application. There are two different licenses for two different program sites for the Magic xpa Application Platform."

"It's not cheap. The licenses are not cheap. Not at all. They cost much money. There are other tools with free licenses but Magic asks for a lot of money."

"The cost for developers is high because you have to pay for licenses as well as runtime."

"My clients have to purchase additional licenses in order to use what I built. It's not a fair approach."

"Magic is not the cheapest IDE out there. If you are considering Magic xpa, you should do a cost-benefit analysis to feel comfortable with your decision. The Magic sales staff is very helpful in providing pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 16% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 14% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Windows Server AppFabric vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

Mendix vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 10% of the time

OutSystems vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 9% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 8% of the time

WebLogic Suite vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Tomcat vs Magic xpa Application Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Magic xpa Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

August 2026

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Magic xpa Application Platform

August 2026

Download Magic xpa Application Platform product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

uniPaaS

Overview

Apache Web Server is a stable, open-source platform known for its cost-effectiveness, multi-platform compatibility, ease of setup, and high security. It supports various web scripting languages and enables HTTPS services, making it a popular choice for many organizations.

Apache Web Server offers extensive features including HTTP server capabilities and modularity. It efficiently handles client requests and is highly flexible, which is why many companies utilize it for hosting applications, developing websites, and more. Community support further enhances its reliability, though improvements like integration with cloud systems such as Kubernetes, a simplified port management, and support for Microsoft's .Net framework are desired. Initial setup challenges exist, and enhanced security features and GUI updates would benefit less experienced users. Apache needs optimization for resource efficiency and compatibility with modern application architectures.

What are the most important features of Apache Web Server?

Open-Source: Apache is free and community-driven.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works on multiple operating systems.
Modular Architecture: Allows scalability and customization.
Secure: Supports HTTPS services and has WAF capabilities.
Performance: Efficiently handles client requests.

What benefits can users expect from using Apache Web Server?

Cost-Effective: No licensing fees associated.
High Reliability: Community support ensures stability.
Flexibility: Easily integrates with numerous frameworks.
Scalability: Modular design aids in scaling operations.
Community Support: Continuous updates and enhancements.

Apache Web Server is widely used across different industries such as financial sectors for hosting applications and core banking systems. Integrated with tools like JMeter and Tomcat, it is pivotal in deploying web servers and acting as a proxy for application servers. In cloud migrations, its open-source WAF features using ModSecurity are invaluable, and companies rely on its capabilities for managing threats and attacks through HTTP/HTTPS connections.

Apache

Magic xpa Application Platform is known for its fast development speed and extensive platform support. It efficiently handles database operations and integrates well with systems like Oracle, supporting Windows, Android, and iOS applications.

Magic xpa Application Platform offers rapid development capabilities, robust database connectivity, and versatile platform support. It integrates seamlessly with systems like Oracle, uses in-memory databases efficiently, and offers flexibility in database operations. Updates and deployments are seamless across Windows, Android, and iOS. The platform facilitates web service communication, XML creation, and isolates database logic from application logic, allowing developers to concentrate on program objectives. Despite its outdated interface and expensive licensing, the platform struggles with mobile and web development integration and complex environments.

What are the key features of Magic xpa Application Platform?

Rapid Development: Accelerates application creation.
Robust Connectivity: Integrates with databases like Oracle.
Versatile Support: Compatible with Windows, Android, iOS.
Seamless Deployment: Simplifies update processes.
Web Service Communication: Eases XML and service interactions.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Magic xpa?

Efficiency: Enhances productivity with fast deployment.
Integration Capabilities: Connects effortlessly with existing systems.
Flexibility: Adapts to multiple operating systems and environments.
Focus: Allows developers to concentrate on main objectives.

In specific industries, Magic xpa Application Platform is utilized for various purposes like IoT support, police and emergency operations management, and ERP development for clients in diverse sectors. Retail billing, document management, HR solutions, healthcare data management, and financial systems leverage its ability to handle complex data exchanges and enable remote access. The platform's expansive application development supports efficient operations in healthcare, retail, and manufacturing.

Magic Software

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

ADD, Cape plc, Adecco, Kuno Kinzoku Industry Co., GE Capital, Dove Tree, CBS Outdoor, Paris-Nord Villepinte Exhibition Center, Allstate Life Insurance Company, Titan Software Systems

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform

August 2026

Free Report: Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Web Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.