Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management comparison

AppDynamics and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. AppDynamics is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #50 with an average rating of 7.0. AppDynamics holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of AppDynamics users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
AppDynamics Database Monito...
Read 31 AppDynamics Database Monitoring reviews
  • 700 Views
  • 468 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

AppDynamics Database Monitoring and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management compete in database monitoring and application performance management. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has superior features, while AppDynamics Database Monitoring excels in pricing and support.

Features: AppDynamics Database Monitoring users highlight its robust analytics, real-time monitoring, and ease of use. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management users praise its comprehensive coverage, deep integration capabilities, and advanced diagnostic tools.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest improving AppDynamics Database Monitoring's granularity in data, alerting mechanisms, and interface versatility. For Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, users indicate a need for better documentation, streamlined processes, and enhanced user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppDynamics Database Monitoring users find the deployment straightforward with strong customer support. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management users report a more complex deployment but commend its thorough customer service.

Pricing and ROI: AppDynamics Database Monitoring is noted for its cost-effectiveness and quick ROI. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is perceived as expensive but justified by its extensive features, leading to substantial long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Report (Updated: September 2024).
Buyer's Guide
AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
September 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 800,688 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

AppDynamics Database Monito...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
50th
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AppDynamics Database Monitoring is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Gyanesh Rahatekar - PeerSpot reviewer
May 26, 2023
Good application performance features along with a very simple and tool navigation
The application end of AppDynamics Database Monitoring needs to improve by checking which applications consume licenses. We are not getting any details from the AppDynamics Database Monitoring portal. AppDynamics Database Monitoring's agent details must be enhanced, so each agent needs to show what kind of technology is being used. I would like to have agent details from AppDynamics Database Monitoring. We are not getting related information and agent details from AppDynamics Database Monitoring. For example, if we have one hundred APM licenses and have onboarded multiple applications, there are no details about which technology uses which kind of agent. Other solutions have one agent that gathers information on all kinds of server components. However, with AppDynamics Database Monitoring, we don't have any universal solution related to application instrumentation, server performance, stats, server component stats, and service stats. We would like to have better server components.
Read full review
Mohammed Shahpoup - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 19, 2024
Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature that is most valuable to us is the snapshot feature. It allows us to get a snapshot of different SQL scripts that are being executed simultaneously and we can identify everything we need on them."
"The product is easy to install, it took about half an hour. The use and the configurations are simple as well."
"The most valuable features of AppDynamics Database Monitoring are you can configure the performance and see in real-time what is exactly happening with the applications. Additionally, the dashboards are good."
"Database scaling or migration projects play a supportive role throughout the development, monitoring, and troubleshooting phases."
"AppDynamics Database Monitoring's most valuable feature is the ability of the out-of-the-box to update the information, provide various metrics, and possibly include custom metrics."
"Data monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"The product is stable and the technical support is good."
"The good thing with AppDynamics Databases is that it will give you a pretty good overview of the data, all the database-like tables, long-running queries, jobs running on the databases, and the queries that are taking more time. So, it's at a deeper level with all the database functionalities, and you will get that information. So, it's a pretty good tool in that sense."
More AppDynamics Database Monitoring pros
"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."
"The technical support and documentation are quite good."
 

Cons

"I would like the solution to be more customizable to meet our client's requirements."
"The product lost its place as an industry leader."
"The networking monitor function could be better, we are not getting many details from it."
"The day-to-day activities should be less complicated so that anyone can manage it."
"An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side."
"The user access management could be a bit better."
"Stability-wise, we experienced some performance issues when upgrading from 4.4 to 4.5."
"The solution needs to support IBM products."
More AppDynamics Database Monitoring cons
"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."
"They lack support and presence in Egypt."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, I feel that when you compare the benefits that we get to the price that we paid, it is reasonable."
"We have a license-based solution. That means you need a license for each server you monitor."
"Pricing is based on the size of the deployment."
"One of the main downsides to the solution is its cost."
"AppDynamics offers a yearly basis license."
"We have purchased a few licenses for AppDynamics Database Monitoring and the price is high."
"I give the price a five out of ten."
"AppDynamics Database Monitoring requires a license for database monitoring and other features, while Dynatrace provides monitoring and other features out of the box without additional costs. Sometimes this makes it more challenging to pitch AppDynamics Database Monitoring to customers, especially because you need to buy a separate license. As an implementer, I have yet to learn about the pricing for AppDynamics Database Monitoring. Pricing is taken care of by the sales team."
More AppDynamics Database Monitoring pricing and cost advice
"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AppDynamics Database Monitoring?
Database scaling or migration projects play a supportive role throughout the development, monitoring, and troubleshooting phases.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics Database Monitoring?
The tool is expensive. If one is expensive and ten is low price, I rate the product price as seven out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AppDynamics Database Monitoring?
The tool provides more insights, but maybe if in the recommendation section, we can use some AI tool for the optimization of the database, then it would be helpful. With AI, it would be good if the...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has suc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring Logo
Dynatrace vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring
Compared 38% of the time
OpenText SiteScope vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring Logo
OpenText SiteScope vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring
Compared 32% of the time
AWS X-Ray vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring Logo
AWS X-Ray vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring
Compared 30% of the time
More AppDynamics Database Monitoring Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
AppDynamics Database Monitoring
September 2024
AppDynamics Database Monitoring reportDownload AppDynamics Database Monitoring product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
August 2024
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reportDownload Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
 

Learn More

AppDynamics
Video not available
Broadcom
 

Overview

More than half of application performance bottlenecks originate in the database, but most application teams have little or no visibility into database performance. With AppDynamics' database performance management product, you get 100% visibility into application performance, from the browser to the database.

Key Benefits

  • Visualize end-to-end application performance, from the browser to the database
  • Get alerts when database thresholds are violated
  • Monitor key performance metrics like top users, programs, SQL, objects and more.
  • See execution plans for slow SQL to isolate performance bottlenecks

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

 

Sample Customers

Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia
NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
Buyer's Guide
AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
September 2024
Free Report: AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.