AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

AppDynamics and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. AppDynamics is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6, while OpenText is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. AppDynamics holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of AppDynamics users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AppDynamics Database Monito...

Read 33 AppDynamics Database Monitoring reviews

587 Views
380 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 25 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,671 Views
808 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AppDynamics Database Monito...

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and AppDynamics Database Monitoring are software solutions designed for system and database monitoring. AppDynamics Database Monitoring offers more compelling features overall, making it the preferred option based on user reviews.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

OpenText SiteScope offers real-time monitoring, historical data analysis capabilities, and competitive pricing. AppDynamics Database Monitoring provides comprehensive performance insights, easy integration with various platforms, and an extensive feature set that appeals to users due to its enhanced performance insights and integration capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Users mention that OpenText SiteScope could improve its alerting mechanisms, reporting capabilities, and return on investment. AppDynamics Database Monitoring users suggest better support documentation, faster query performance, and improved customer service response times.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

OpenText SiteScope is relatively straightforward to deploy but requires occasional support. AppDynamics Database Monitoring is noted for its smooth deployment process and responsive customer service, making it the preferred choice for ease of setup and support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

OpenText SiteScope is noted for its competitive pricing, but users feel the return on investment could be higher due to the limitations in features. AppDynamics Database Monitoring, while more expensive, is considered to provide better ROI thanks to its comprehensive feature set and performance benefits. Users justify the higher price due to its superior capabilities and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AppDynamics Database Monito...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AppDynamics Database Monitoring is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Nuno Rosa

Principal Consultant at Infosys

Has an easy initial setup process and has valuable database performance monitoring features

In one of the scenarios, a retail company encountered transaction failure issues. The problem was not with the card or payment system but the database operations. By utilizing AppDynamics, the team traced end-to-end transactions and identified a database latency problem. Monitoring the entire end-to-end system allows us to pinpoint performance issues in the database. Tracking the user journey helped us identify the issues between the middleware and the database. The topology view feature helps in effective monitoring. However, this feature was developed six years ago and still needs to be updated. The application needs broader improvements and reshaping for this particular area. Database scaling or migration projects play a supportive role throughout the development, monitoring, and troubleshooting phases. During development, it integrates seamlessly with the SDLC. It detects and resolves performance issues, ensuring database availability and minimizing downtime. I rate it an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence

The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient. By using templates for systems or databases, I can monitor various needs easily, which saves time and increases productivity.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features related to the application performance in AppDynamics Database Monitoring are the most valuable."

"You have a live view of what happens when something goes wrong on the production or support side. You don't have to scramble and do guesswork. We can identify the query that creates the bottleneck or slows the performance of the database system. It can give you points on how to debug and fix the system."

"In my experience, it's easy to use. There's nothing complex to learn or fear. You can quickly adapt to it without the need for extensive training."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ability to discover and track transactions."

"The dashboards are very well-defined."

"The product is stable and the technical support is good."

"We were able to correct problems, which led to an increase in availability, time savings, and performance for our solutions."

"The feature that is most valuable to us is the snapshot feature. It allows us to get a snapshot of different SQL scripts that are being executed simultaneously and we can identify everything we need on them."

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring pros

"The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence."

"Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient."

"The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring."

"It has multiple monitors that can be deployed OOTB, which includes basic system monitors for CPU, Disk, Memory, NIC's, etc."

"There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server."

"Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored."

"The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."

"For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"The tool is expensive."

"I would like the solution to be more customizable to meet our client's requirements."

"The product requires high maintenance."

"The user access management could be a bit better."

"An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side."

"The limitations are often due to the vendors not supplying all the profiling features to AppDynamics."

"The scalability could be improved."

"This product has an issue with initial lag upon opening that we would like to see improved."

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring cons

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

"We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope."

"The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."

"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."

"The graphs and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

"In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution."

"The tool needs to support new technologies like Kubernetes. It also needs to improve scalability."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a license-based solution. That means you need a license for each server you monitor."

"We buy the platform's yearly subscription."

"One of the main downsides to the solution is its cost."

"In terms of pricing, I feel that when you compare the benefits that we get to the price that we paid, it is reasonable."

"Pricing is based on the size of the deployment."

"There is an annual cost for the use of this solution."

"We have purchased a few licenses for AppDynamics Database Monitoring and the price is high."

"AppDynamics offers a yearly basis license."

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring pricing and cost advice

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"Licensing is a little steep."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

39%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

32%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Database scaling or migration projects play a supportive role throughout the development, monitoring, and troubleshooting phases.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

The price is not cheap, however, considering the benefits and the price ratio, I would rate it nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Based on my experience, some databases like Couchbase, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB require a little bit of enhancement as they are newer and not as widely used as other databases. The limitations are o...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

While working with OpenText, I noticed sometimes teams refuse intervention due to compliance issues. Overcoming control restrictions for different applications could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring

Compared 50% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring

Compared 50% of the time

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring Competitors

AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 12% of the time

Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

Prometheus vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 10% of the time

SCOM vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AppDynamics Database Monitoring

January 2025

Download AppDynamics Database Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

December 2024

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Learn More

AppDynamics

OpenText

Overview

More than half of application performance bottlenecks originate in the database, but most application teams have little or no visibility into database performance. With AppDynamics' database performance management product, you get 100% visibility into application performance, from the browser to the database.

Key Benefits

Visualize end-to-end application performance, from the browser to the database
Get alerts when database thresholds are violated
Monitor key performance metrics like top users, programs, SQL, objects and more.
See execution plans for slow SQL to isolate performance bottlenecks

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

Sample Customers

Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope

January 2025

Free Report: AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.