AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

AppDynamics and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. AppDynamics is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.8. AppDynamics holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of AppDynamics users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AppDynamics Database Monito...

Read 33 AppDynamics Database Monitoring reviews

669 Views
451 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 24 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,788 Views
889 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AppDynamics Database Monito...

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and AppDynamics Database Monitoring are software solutions designed for system and database monitoring. AppDynamics Database Monitoring offers more compelling features overall, making it the preferred option based on user reviews.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

OpenText SiteScope offers real-time monitoring, historical data analysis capabilities, and competitive pricing. AppDynamics Database Monitoring provides comprehensive performance insights, easy integration with various platforms, and an extensive feature set that appeals to users due to its enhanced performance insights and integration capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Users mention that OpenText SiteScope could improve its alerting mechanisms, reporting capabilities, and return on investment. AppDynamics Database Monitoring users suggest better support documentation, faster query performance, and improved customer service response times.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

OpenText SiteScope is relatively straightforward to deploy but requires occasional support. AppDynamics Database Monitoring is noted for its smooth deployment process and responsive customer service, making it the preferred choice for ease of setup and support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

OpenText SiteScope is noted for its competitive pricing, but users feel the return on investment could be higher due to the limitations in features. AppDynamics Database Monitoring, while more expensive, is considered to provide better ROI thanks to its comprehensive feature set and performance benefits. Users justify the higher price due to its superior capabilities and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

AppDynamics Database Monito...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

41st

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AppDynamics Database Monitoring is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Siva Jp

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTIMindtree

Sep 12, 2024

Helps the application team improve the user experience and reduce the impact of any problems

We used Dynatrace, which comes with full-stack observability. Full-stack observability has evolved to the point where, competitively, you can ask how AppDynamics and Dynatrace compare. Dynatrace takes a slight lead here. It can do dynamic baselining and anomaly detection. It gives a little more transactional insights and is more comprehensive. There's a slight difference, but not a major impact, in terms of database monitoring on both tools. They are both competitive products. One way they try to compete is in terms of APIs, but the only difference I see is that AppDynamics has a slight advantage in one area. We don't have multiple agents, we go with the concept of one agent. Second, Dynatrace leads in observability, integrating with other on-premises and cloud systems. They are both competitive enough in the same pricing range. They are not so different, they are both in the same range. If you go and negotiate, they are the same.

Read full review

Christopher M Cook

Senior Service Analyst at Exelon

Jul 11, 2022

Doesn't require much custom coding and can run on different platforms, but the types of scripting files you can execute on it are limited

In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AppDynamics Database Monitoring provides a single view of the problem and helps identify the guilty database query, which is unique compared to other solutions."

"The product is stable and the technical support is good."

"What I found valuable in AppDynamics Database Monitoring is good technical support. I also like that it's scalable and stable."

"The most valuable feature in this solution, for our business, is the clear way of projecting the connections between the database and the traffic inflow. This is very helpful when troubleshooting issues."

"The features related to the application performance in AppDynamics Database Monitoring are the most valuable."

"The most valuable features of AppDynamics Database Monitoring are you can configure the performance and see in real-time what is exactly happening with the applications. Additionally, the dashboards are good."

"The ability to identify the top running queries has been extremely valuable for us."

"Knowing which tables on the database were working the most was valuable. It helped the client understand where they need to focus. They streamlined a lot of their queries and brought the resource usage down. It helped them to find long-running queries. They rewrote them completely so that they don't take as long and the application performs better."

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring pros

"Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored."

"The URL monitoring is excellent."

"There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server."

"It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics."

"VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."

"SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability."

"Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours."

"The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"The solution must improve security and setup."

"I would like the solution to be more customizable to meet our client's requirements."

"AppDynamics Database Monitoring would be improved with more support for microservices architecture."

"Stability-wise, we experienced some performance issues when upgrading from 4.4 to 4.5."

"They could align the product strategy to evolve as a complete solution."

"The product lost its place as an industry leader."

"I have found it sometimes a bit difficult to trace the transaction all the way through to the application. I'm not sure if that problem is on the database side or on the application side, but that would be something that I would like to be improved. The traceability from the application to the database, sometimes, is a bit of a challenge. If you're using AppDynamics, with the Java agent, for instance, you need to be able to trace it through."

"The synthetic scripting for end-user monitoring could be a little bit broader. Instead of using just Python, they can include a few other languages so that not everyone has to jump on the bandwagon for Python and do Selenium scripting. They can open up that a bit to make it simpler for people to do the scripting."

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring cons

"Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI."

"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files."

"We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope."

"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."

"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

"You can use OpenText SiteScope for small or middle environments. But if you want to monitor a large environment, it is not scalable. If you can monitor a large environment with OpenText SiteScope, it can be a valuable product."

"The tool needs to support new technologies like Kubernetes. It also needs to improve scalability."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license for AppDynamics is procured by our customers."

"We have a license-based solution. That means you need a license for each server you monitor."

"One of the main downsides to the solution is its cost."

"AppDynamics offers a yearly basis license."

"There is an annual cost for the use of this solution."

"We buy the platform's yearly subscription."

"In terms of pricing, I feel that when you compare the benefits that we get to the price that we paid, it is reasonable."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring pricing and cost advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

36%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

32%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Database scaling or migration projects play a supportive role throughout the development, monitoring, and troubleshooting phases.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

The price is not cheap, however, considering the benefits and the price ratio, I would rate it nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Based on my experience, some databases like Couchbase, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB require a little bit of enhancement as they are newer and not as widely used as other databases. The limitations are o...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

I would rate the pricing of SiteScope as a five out of ten in terms of costliness. It is not overly expensive, but there is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness in some areas.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

In terms of improvement, OpenText SiteScop could become a better solution by adding more monitoring templates, like RedScope, to make it easier to track specific technologies. It should also improv...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring

Compared 52% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs AppDynamics Database Monitoring

Compared 48% of the time

More AppDynamics Database Monitoring Competitors

AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 13% of the time

SCOM vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

Prometheus vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AppDynamics Database Monitoring

November 2024

Download AppDynamics Database Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

November 2024

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Learn More

AppDynamics

OpenText

Overview

More than half of application performance bottlenecks originate in the database, but most application teams have little or no visibility into database performance. With AppDynamics' database performance management product, you get 100% visibility into application performance, from the browser to the database.

Key Benefits

Visualize end-to-end application performance, from the browser to the database
Get alerts when database thresholds are violated
Monitor key performance metrics like top users, programs, SQL, objects and more.
See execution plans for slow SQL to isolate performance bottlenecks

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

Sample Customers

Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope

October 2024

Free Report: AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.