Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk AppDynamics Logo

Top 10 Splunk AppDynamics Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
6,349 followers
Post review

Top Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk AppDynamics based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Splunk AppDynamics surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration, real-time analytics, and a user-friendly interface that enhances operational efficiency, delivering powerful insights and enabling businesses to optimize performance and improve customer experience effortlessly.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers user-friendly deployment with AI-driven analytics and efficient customer service, making it ideal for swift integration and insights. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides in-depth diagnostics and code-level visibility, appealing to those needing comprehensive application performance monitoring despite higher costs.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Dynatrace offers an efficient setup process with competitive initial costs, while Splunk AppDynamics may require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace offers an efficient setup process with competitive initial costs, while Splunk AppDynamics may require a higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides deep application monitoring and business insights, ideal for enterprises seeking detailed analytics. In comparison, Datadog offers extensive integration and a unified monitoring interface, appealing to businesses favoring ease of use and comprehensive platform coverage across services and applications.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making Datadog an attractive choice for cost-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making Datadog an attractive choice for cost-conscious businesses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced performance management features appealing to enterprises needing detailed analytics. In comparison, Zabbix's open-source flexibility attracts budget-conscious organizations emphasizing network monitoring and customization.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zabbix Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost, while Zabbix offers a more cost-effective installation option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost, while Zabbix offers a more cost-effective installation option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics specializes in diagnostics, tracking, and monitoring, excelling in code-level insights, while New Relic focuses on reliable server management and seamless system integration. In comparison, AppDynamics faces setup complexities, whereas New Relic's challenges lie in its pricing models and data privacy concerns.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a lower setup cost compared to New Relic's higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy for businesses considering these monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a lower setup cost compared to New Relic's higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy for businesses considering these monitoring solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
AppDynamics excels at in-depth application performance insights, ideal for proactive risk management. In comparison, Azure Monitor's strength lies in real-time surveillance with seamless Azure integration. Tech buyers benefit from AppDynamics' depth or Azure Monitor's cost-effectiveness and integration flexibility.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, whereas Azure Monitor offers a more cost-effective implementation, making Azure Monitor a budget-friendly option compared to Splunk AppDynamics.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, whereas Azure Monitor offers a more cost-effective implementation, making Azure Monitor a budget-friendly option compared to Splunk AppDynamics.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides robust transaction tracking and JVM performance monitoring, capturing deep business insights for effective debugging. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in integration capabilities and real-time transaction views but lacks some advanced APM features that AppDynamics offers.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics features a substantial upfront setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a clear difference in initial financial outlay between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics features a substantial upfront setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a clear difference in initial financial outlay between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive monitoring and proactive alerting for complex environments. In comparison, Grafana's strength lies in its open-source model and versatile visualization capabilities. A tech buyer may choose AppDynamics for performance insights, while Grafana appeals to those prioritizing cost efficiency.
Download Grafana vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while Grafana offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for organizations with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while Grafana offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for organizations with limited budgets.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers extensive monitoring capabilities, tracking transactions and performance, while providing JVM and hardware monitoring. In comparison, Sentry excels in error tracking and integrations, focusing on performance metrics and error logs. Splunk benefits businesses needing method-level insights, whereas Sentry suits projects seeking cost-effective error tracking.
Download Sentry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive features, while Sentry offers a more cost-effective setup without compromising essential functionality, highlighting the significant difference in initial financial investment required for these platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive features, while Sentry offers a more cost-effective setup without compromising essential functionality, highlighting the significant difference in initial financial investment required for these platforms.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Prometheus
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Prometheus
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced dashboards and middleware tracking, ideal for executive decision-making. In comparison, Prometheus provides flexibility with Kubernetes integrations. AppDynamics supports various deployments with premium features, while Prometheus's open-source nature makes it cost-effective for tech buyers seeking affordability.
Download Prometheus vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics presents a higher setup cost, offering robust features, while Prometheus maintains a lower setup cost with a focus on open-source flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics presents a higher setup cost, offering robust features, while Prometheus maintains a lower setup cost with a focus on open-source flexibility.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics delivers extensive insights suitable for enterprises seeking robust monitoring capabilities and detailed analytics. In comparison, AWS X-Ray offers cost-effective deployment with strong AWS integration, appealing to businesses prioritizing efficiency and affordability in distributed application monitoring.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, contrasting sharply with the more budget-friendly setup of AWS X-Ray.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, contrasting sharply with the more budget-friendly setup of AWS X-Ray.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides detailed diagnostics and real-time performance analytics, ideal for high-scale operations. In comparison, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is known for server and infrastructure monitoring with competitive pricing, appealing to midsize enterprises seeking straightforward initial setups.
Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers a more affordable setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers versatile monitoring with stack trace and JVM features, ideal for diverse application layers. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring, specifically tailored for financial services, providing customizable dashboards and robust system integration.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics features a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, while ITRS Geneos offers a more complex setup, leading to higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics features a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, while ITRS Geneos offers a more complex setup, leading to higher initial expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management provides integrated monitoring and robust event management across diverse assets. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring with detailed transactional insights and superior analytics. BMC simplifies resource management, while AppDynamics offers advanced performance analytics with cloud flexibility.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. BMC TrueSight provides robust features justifying its cost, whereas Splunk AppDynamics presents a compelling option for cost-conscious ...
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. BMC TrueSight provides robust features justifying its cost, whereas Splunk AppDynamics presents a compelling option for cost-conscious ...
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in detailed application performance monitoring with stack traces and JVM metrics. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite offers integrated cloud service monitoring and logging. AppDynamics provides granular insights, whereas Google Cloud excels in seamless ecosystem integration at a typically lower cost.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting distinct pricing approaches.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting distinct pricing approaches.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics is favored for comprehensive monitoring and ease of diagnosis from code-level to business transactions. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations excels in stack visibility and cloud integration, offering benefits for environments leveraging VMware’s ecosystem, despite its setup complexity and cost considerations.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Splunk AppDynamics presents a relatively moderate setup cost with broad analytic capabilities, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a higher initial expense with robust management features, making the pricing structure a key differentiator.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics presents a relatively moderate setup cost with broad analytic capabilities, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a higher initial expense with robust management features, making the pricing structure a key differentiator.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in seamless integration and extensive ROI, appealing to businesses with established infrastructures. In comparison, Honeycomb.io attracts tech buyers with its event-driven architecture and flexible trace view, ideal for those prioritizing agile data analysis and cost-effective results.
Download Honeycomb.io vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a considerable setup cost compared to Honeycomb.io, which offers a more cost-effective setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a considerable setup cost compared to Honeycomb.io, which offers a more cost-effective setup process.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold attracts budget-conscious buyers with its straightforward deployment and customer support, emphasizing simplicity in network monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics justifies its higher cost with advanced features and complex configurations, appealing to those seeking in-depth application performance insights.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold requires a lower initial setup cost, whereas Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold requires a lower initial setup cost, whereas Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher investment for setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Instana Dynamic APM
3.8 out of 5
AppDynamics emphasizes transaction tracking and monitoring, beneficial for comprehensive application insights. In comparison, Instana highlights real-time updates and user-friendly interfaces, appealing for simplicity. AppDynamics faces pricing and UI complexity, while Instana presents budget-friendly options with straightforward deployment.
Download Instana Dynamic APM vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics presents a moderate setup cost, suitable for varied business sizes, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a streamlined setup often preferred for enterprises seeking rapid implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics presents a moderate setup cost, suitable for varied business sizes, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a streamlined setup often preferred for enterprises seeking rapid implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in comprehensive APM capabilities, appealing to enterprises needing deep visibility. In comparison, Coralogix focuses on cost-effective log management with AI insights, attracting businesses seeking efficient deployment and streamlined analysis for enhanced operational efficiency.
Download Coralogix vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a significant setup cost, whereas Coralogix offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a key pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a significant setup cost, whereas Coralogix offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a key pricing difference.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed application insights and flexible deployment options, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance focuses on network reliability and cost-effectiveness, ideal for those prioritizing connectivity assurance and moderate pricing in their technology investment.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics setup cost is generally competitive with transparent options, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance often features lower initial setup fees with a focus on cost-efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics setup cost is generally competitive with transparent options, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance often features lower initial setup fees with a focus on cost-efficiency.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Alluvio Aternity excels in user-level data correlation and granularity. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics differentiates complex transactions effectively. Aternity's competitive pricing appeals to cost-conscious buyers, while AppDynamics suits enterprises seeking in-depth transaction insights at a higher investment level.
Download Alluvio Aternity vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio Aternity offers competitive setup costs compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which has higher initial charges. While Alluvio provides more cost-effective entry, Splunk offers expanded capabilities with its premium pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio Aternity offers competitive setup costs compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which has higher initial charges. While Alluvio provides more cost-effective entry, Splunk offers expanded capabilities with its premium pricing model.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Catchpoint excels in synthetic monitoring with global tracking capabilities. In comparison, AppDynamics offers deep application tracking with minimal overhead. Catchpoint's deployment focuses on public cloud while AppDynamics supports diverse environments. Catchpoint's pricing clarity contrasts with AppDynamics' feature-rich, higher-priced offerings promising strong ROI.
Download Catchpoint vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics setup cost is viewed as substantial, while Catchpoint is noted for its more manageable setup cost. These differences highlight the varying budget implications between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics setup cost is viewed as substantial, while Catchpoint is noted for its more manageable setup cost. These differences highlight the varying budget implications between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise excels in end-to-end monitoring across the OSI model with features like auto-configuration, ideal for Citrix environments. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers strong application performance monitoring with advanced transaction tracking, preferred for those needing deeper analytics and performance optimization.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise often receives positive feedback for its low setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics is frequently noted for higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise often receives positive feedback for its low setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics is frequently noted for higher initial expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.8 out of 5
OpenText SiteScope emphasizes agentless monitoring and affordability, appealing to those focusing on infrastructure needs. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics targets advanced application performance management, attracting buyers prioritizing deep analytics and seamless DevOps integration despite higher costs.
Download OpenText SiteScope vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
OpenText SiteScope has a straightforward setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics may involve higher initial expenses. Differences in pricing highlight distinct approaches to cost management in these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText SiteScope has a straightforward setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics may involve higher initial expenses. Differences in pricing highlight distinct approaches to cost management in these solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced performance insights and strong customer support, appealing to those seeking extensive analytics and personalized assistance. In comparison, OpenTelemetry provides flexibility and cost-effectiveness, attracting developers with its open-source integration and community-focused resources.
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher initial setup cost, while OpenTelemetry offers a lower cost option, highlighting a budget-friendly alternative for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher initial setup cost, while OpenTelemetry offers a lower cost option, highlighting a budget-friendly alternative for implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ManageEngine Applications Manager
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine Applications Manager appeals with affordability and ease of deployment, offering essential performance monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics attracts tech buyers with extensive features and advanced analytics, despite a higher cost and complex deployment, justified by significant ROI through comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
Download ManageEngine Applications Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a cost-effective setup compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which tends to have a higher upfront expense. Splunk AppDynamics invests more in advanced features, impacting its initial cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a cost-effective setup compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which tends to have a higher upfront expense. Splunk AppDynamics invests more in advanced features, impacting its initial cost structure.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management
4.0 out of 5
Broadcom DX excels in customization, integration, and comprehensive Java and .NET monitoring, appealing to users seeking detailed transaction tracing. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers deep analysis, robust flow visualizations, and intuitive configuration, making it ideal for diverse technology monitoring and user interaction insights.
Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which is notable for those prioritizing out-of-the-box cost-effectiveness during implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which is notable for those prioritizing out-of-the-box cost-effectiveness during implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics appeals to businesses needing comprehensive analytics and visualizations for diverse IT environments. In comparison, OmniPeek is ideal for those seeking detailed network packet analysis. AppDynamics suits broader IT monitoring, while OmniPeek targets specific network diagnostics with economical pricing.
Download OmniPeek vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a lower setup cost, while OmniPeek requires a higher initial investment. This price difference makes Splunk AppDynamics more accessible for budget-conscious users compared to OmniPeek.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a lower setup cost, while OmniPeek requires a higher initial investment. This price difference makes Splunk AppDynamics more accessible for budget-conscious users compared to OmniPeek.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics
3.9 out of 5
SolarWinds AppOptics offers centralized visibility and traditional monitoring, making it ideal for simpler network environments. In comparison, AppDynamics excels in complex environments with advanced transaction tracking and deep dive capabilities, appealing to buyers who need in-depth application performance analysis and troubleshooting.
Download SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a significant initial setup cost, while SolarWinds AppOptics offers a more budget-friendly pricing model contrasted by its simpler installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a significant initial setup cost, while SolarWinds AppOptics offers a more budget-friendly pricing model contrasted by its simpler installation process.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Akamai mPulse
3.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Akamai mPulse
3.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive application performance monitoring with attractive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Akamai mPulse provides detailed real-user monitoring and adaptive alerts, catering to data-driven environments despite its higher initial investment. Each offers unique strengths suited to different business needs.
Download Akamai mPulse vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a moderate setup cost, while Akamai mPulse offers a low-cost initial setup, distinguishing them significantly in upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a moderate setup cost, while Akamai mPulse offers a low-cost initial setup, distinguishing them significantly in upfront investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio AppResponse
4.4 out of 5
Alluvio AppResponse offers cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, with strengths in network diagnostics. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics, favored for its extensive features in application insights, provides a comprehensive monitoring solution despite a more complex setup and higher price point.
Download Alluvio AppResponse vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio AppResponse's setup cost is competitive with streamlined integration, whereas Splunk AppDynamics presents a more robust setup process often leading to higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio AppResponse's setup cost is competitive with streamlined integration, whereas Splunk AppDynamics presents a more robust setup process often leading to higher initial expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ServiceNow Cloud Observability
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in real-time monitoring, offering quick deployment and insightful analytics. In comparison, ServiceNow Cloud Observability provides extensive feature coverage with stronger integration capabilities, appealing for long-term strategic goals despite its higher cost and potentially complex setup.
Download ServiceNow Cloud Observability vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a high setup cost, while ServiceNow Cloud Observability offers a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting significant differences in their initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a high setup cost, while ServiceNow Cloud Observability offers a more cost-effective setup option, highlighting significant differences in their initial investment requirements.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Chronosphere
4.5 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Chronosphere
4.5 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics draws users with its deep code insights and structured deployment processes. In comparison, Chronosphere appeals to those prioritizing scalability and complex data handling. Splunk AppDynamics offers affordability, while Chronosphere attracts buyers seeking long-term value in scalable environments.
Splunk AppDynamics involves a more substantial setup cost, while Chronosphere offers a more affordable implementation option, highlighting a cost-effective difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a more substantial setup cost, while Chronosphere offers a more affordable implementation option, highlighting a cost-effective difference between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Stackify
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Stackify
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in customer support and ease of implementation, appealing to enterprises with comprehensive monitoring needs. In comparison, Stackify's cost-effective, developer-centric features and agile cloud deployment attract budget-conscious buyers seeking high ROI and efficient application performance tracking.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Stackify Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Stackify, highlighting a significant initial investment difference, which may be a crucial consideration for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Stackify, highlighting a significant initial investment difference, which may be a crucial consideration for budget-conscious users.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
IBM Application Performance Management
3.2 out of 5
AppDynamics offers deep visibility and real-time analytics, ideal for troubleshooting and detailed insights. In comparison, IBM APM integrates seamlessly with IBM tools and offers cost-effective pricing. AppDynamics suits those needing comprehensive features, while IBM APM is suitable for IBM tool users seeking value.
Download IBM Application Performance Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a lower setup cost compared to IBM Application Performance Management, providing a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. On the other hand, IBM offers more comprehensive features for a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a lower setup cost compared to IBM Application Performance Management, providing a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. On the other hand, IBM offers more comprehensive features for a higher setup investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apache SkyWalking
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced analytics and real-time monitoring, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive support and integration. In comparison, Apache SkyWalking offers cost-effective, flexible deployment through its open-source model, attracting those valuing customization and budget-friendly solutions over structured services.
Splunk AppDynamics typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Apache SkyWalking, which is often seen as more budget-friendly due to its open-source nature.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Apache SkyWalking, which is often seen as more budget-friendly due to its open-source nature.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apica
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apica
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics focuses on application performance with deep stack tracing and transaction insights. In comparison, Apica specializes in global web performance monitoring with robust scripting capabilities, offering budgeting flexibility for organizations needing effective performance monitoring without extensive additional costs.
Download Apica vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Apica, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Apica, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two platforms.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Avantra
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Avantra
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics attracts tech buyers with its real-time analytics and integration across IT systems. In comparison, Avantra appeals due to its SAP-centric automation, offering a tailored solution for SAP environments. Each serves distinctive needs based on organizational focus and infrastructure.
Download Avantra vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires higher initial setup costs compared to Avantra, highlighting a significant difference in financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires higher initial setup costs compared to Avantra, highlighting a significant difference in financial commitment between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds Pingdom
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds Pingdom
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed application performance monitoring for complex IT environments, providing strong integration and analytics. In comparison, SolarWinds Pingdom provides user-friendly website performance monitoring with efficient deployment, making it attractive for quick implementation and immediate usability.
Download SolarWinds Pingdom vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, while SolarWinds Pingdom offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, while SolarWinds Pingdom offers a more affordable initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
3.3 out of 5
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is ideal for IBM environments due to cost-effectiveness and integration. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers greater scalability and advanced analytics, appealing to those needing dynamic performance insights. Each caters to distinct organizational requirements based on budget and features.
Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics offers a more cost-effective initial setup option. This presents a significant cost difference in the initial stages of implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics offers a more cost-effective initial setup option. This presents a significant cost difference in the initial stages of implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers intuitive analytics and seamless integration, appealing to agile environments with straightforward deployment and exceptional support. In comparison, Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service provides comprehensive features and deep diagnostics, suiting needs for extensive cloud integration and long-term strategic returns.
Splunk AppDynamics setup costs are noted for flexibility, while Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service emphasizes affordability. Splunk's initial investment may vary with added customization options compared to Oracle's standardized pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics setup costs are noted for flexibility, while Oracle Application Performance Monitoring Cloud Service emphasizes affordability. Splunk's initial investment may vary with added customization options compared to Oracle's standardized pricing structure.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText Real User Monitoring
3.3 out of 5
OpenText Real User Monitoring appeals to cost-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and straightforward installation. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics attracts those seeking advanced features like dynamic performance baselines and comprehensive transaction monitoring, justifying its higher cost and offering richer performance management capabilities.
Download OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
OpenText Real User Monitoring has a simpler setup cost structure, while Splunk AppDynamics involves a more complex setup. This highlights OpenText's ease of deployment compared to the more detailed configuration required for Splunk AppDynamics.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Real User Monitoring has a simpler setup cost structure, while Splunk AppDynamics involves a more complex setup. This highlights OpenText's ease of deployment compared to the more detailed configuration required for Splunk AppDynamics.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
IBM Instana Observability
4.0 out of 5
Tech buyers might choose Splunk AppDynamics for its competitive pricing and robust analytics. In comparison, IBM Instana Observability offers automated root-cause analysis and seamless real-time data visibility, attracting those seeking advanced automation and efficient customer service.
Download IBM Instana Observability vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics presents a competitive setup cost structure, while IBM Instana Observability often comes with a higher initial investment. Note the cost differences when evaluating these observability solutions for your needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics presents a competitive setup cost structure, while IBM Instana Observability often comes with a higher initial investment. Note the cost differences when evaluating these observability solutions for your needs.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText Diagnostics
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Diagnostics offers competitive pricing and customer support, providing efficient log analysis and real-time insights. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics, with advanced analytics and automated root-cause diagnosis, justifies higher costs, appealing to those prioritizing robust features and deep application insights.
Download OpenText Diagnostics vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
OpenText Diagnostics incurs a higher setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which offers a more competitive initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Diagnostics incurs a higher setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which offers a more competitive initial pricing.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Rakuten SixthSense
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application monitoring and analytics, making it ideal for those prioritizing ease of deployment and support. In comparison, Rakuten SixthSense offers comprehensive features like predictive analytics, appealing to buyers seeking a complete, future-oriented system with greater long-term value.
Splunk AppDynamics requires a substantial initial setup cost, whereas Rakuten SixthSense offers a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a substantial initial setup cost, whereas Rakuten SixthSense offers a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AlertSite
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AlertSite
4.0 out of 5
AlertSite offers competitive pricing and ease of deployment, supported by synthetic monitoring, making it ideal for quick implementation. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive real-user monitoring and business intelligence, suiting organizations prioritizing detailed insights and long-term strategic value despite higher costs.
Download AlertSite vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
AlertSite offers straightforward setup costs, making it ideal for budget-conscious businesses, while Splunk AppDynamics may require a higher investment due to its comprehensive setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
AlertSite offers straightforward setup costs, making it ideal for budget-conscious businesses, while Splunk AppDynamics may require a higher investment due to its comprehensive setup options.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
CA App Synthetic Monitor
3.5 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides real-time analytics and robust integrations for performance insights. In comparison, CA App Synthetic Monitor excels in global monitoring reach with cloud-based deployment. Splunk AppDynamics suits complex environments, while CA App Synthetic Monitor offers flexibility and lower initial costs for quicker ROI.
Download CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics generally involves a high setup cost compared to CA App Synthetic Monitor, which offers a more economical setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics generally involves a high setup cost compared to CA App Synthetic Monitor, which offers a more economical setup process.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText Business Process Monitoring
4.1 out of 5
OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers cost-effective pricing and easy deployment with strong support. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced analytics and extensive features, which appeal to businesses seeking a comprehensive solution despite the higher cost. Both cater to different priorities for tech buyers.
Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers competitive setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics presents a higher initial investment. The difference in expense could be a key factor when evaluating these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers competitive setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics presents a higher initial investment. The difference in expense could be a key factor when evaluating these solutions.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
IT Operations Analytics