Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring vs Instabug comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

AppDynamics Mobile Real-Use...
Ranking in Mobile APM
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Instabug
Ranking in Mobile APM
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Mobile APM category, the mindshare of AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Instabug is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile APM
 

Featured Reviews

EmilSiric - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers insights into peak usage hours, the application's status, and that of secondary services, such as databases and APIs
The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach. Additionally, there's potential for enhancing the pricing structure, particularly as scaling up can become expensive. Given the continual growth of the mobile landscape, revisiting the pricing model could be beneficial.
Aisha Mazher - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution that provides visibility into user journeys and enables the filing of RCA reports
The initial setup was really easy. There were some calls that we had to integrate into our code. Instabug was easy to integrate with our app. If we needed special logs for some calls to check the response rate of some end-to-end procedures, we could also integrate them. There were some APIs we could use for end-to-end integration. The product was deployed on Bitbucket. The beta app was deployed in our local environment. The deployment process was not time-consuming. The production phase took a day. It was just a one-time effort. For the beta app, we had to do it multiple times, but it was easy to deploy.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For anybody who is looking into enhancing or improving their application code quality, I would definitely recommend this solution."
"There are many features that are very valuable to us, but the ability to monitor the status of the users' experience in real-time is one of them."
"We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"Whenever the application crashes from user behavior, we can easily simulate the error. We are happy with this feature and find it to be valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its GUI."
"In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool identified an issue within the mobile app, causing lost transactions in the billing system."
"The product makes it very easy to reproduce issues."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
 

Cons

"There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java."
"I would like to see a better way to automate actions based on the events generated by the tool."
"I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now."
"In terms of improvements we would like to see, we want to understand what the battery consumption metrics are whenever a user is viewing. It would be really helpful for us if we could get those details levels."
"The way the agentless monitoring and agent monitoring get used is to be decided by the user, but there is no clarification on the setup phase or on how and why to use the aforementioned options."
"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."
"It would be beneficial if the tool could be more precise in capturing steps, focusing only on the relevant ones. For example, there were some times when it caught some extra screenshots which were not included in the steps. Sometimes, it also happened that it got some extra steps that were not in there to reproduce the bug. We also called that screenshot and the steps there as well."
"The end users were not able to report bugs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring's pricing as seven out of ten. Mobile monitoring is paid based on the number of instances utilizing the mobile monitoring service, which increases as the scale grows. Consequently, your mobile user count can proportionally surpass all other applications."
"I believe there was probably an extra charge whenever I wanted to contact the support team."
"It does require licensing to be paid."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile APM solutions are best for your needs.
825,609 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring?
In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool ident...
What needs improvement with AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring?
The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to relea...
What is your primary use case for AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring?
The use case involves evaluating a mobile application's performance and user experience. We seek insights into peak usage hours, the application's status, and that of secondary services, such as da...
What do you like most about Instabug?
The product makes it very easy to reproduce issues.
What needs improvement with Instabug?
The end users were not able to report bugs. We had to depend only upon the crash reports. For example, if an application was not crashing, but a specific functionality was not working, the QA perso...
What is your primary use case for Instabug?
I used the solution to perform RCA for my app. I used to review the crash reports every week and check which API or call was failing repeatedly. I created a debugging configuration in Jira and repo...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring vs. Instabug and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
825,609 professionals have used our research since 2012.