Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024
AppDynamics Server Monitoring and Cisco Intersight both compete in the server monitoring solutions category, offering robust capabilities for modern enterprises. Cisco Intersight seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive features, which users believe justify the investment compared to AppDynamics.
Features: AppDynamics Server Monitoring provides real-time performance monitoring, quick issue identification with end-to-end capabilities, and user-praised dynamic learning for infrastructure. Cisco Intersight offers seamless cloud integration, diverse configuration support, and unified portal views for data center management with integrations like HashiCorp and Kubernetes.
Room for Improvement: AppDynamics Server Monitoring could improve in application integration, license management, and analytics refinement. Cisco Intersight requires enhancements in hybrid cloud management, third-party tool integration, and increased automation features. Its complexity poses challenges for user adoption.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppDynamics Server Monitoring is slightly more complex to deploy across server environments than Cisco Intersight. Both products provide strong support, with AppDynamics offering quick technical assistance, while Cisco Intersight's service responsiveness varies depending on location.
Pricing and ROI: AppDynamics Server Monitoring is more expensive, though negotiation can improve costs, and it shows positive ROI in SAP environments. Cisco Intersight's pricing is viewed as more competitive and cost-effective, with both solutions delivering substantial ROI aligned with critical customer needs over two to three years.
To learn more, read our detailed
AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs. Cisco Intersight Report (Updated: October 2024).
