Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager comparison

Cisco Intersight and Cisco UCS Manager are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco Intersight is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7, while Cisco UCS Manager is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7. Cisco Intersight holds a 2.4% mindshare in IM, compared to Cisco UCS Manager’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco Intersight users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Cisco UCS Manager users who would recommend it.

Cisco Intersight

Read 10 Cisco Intersight reviews

2,845 Views
2,330 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 23 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

1,952 Views
1,691 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Cisco Intersight

Cisco UCS Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Cisco UCS Manager and Cisco Intersight are management platforms competing in the data center environment category. Cisco Intersight is perceived to have the upper hand due to its modern capabilities, while Cisco UCS Manager is preferred for cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: Cisco UCS Manager offers robust management for networking and storage, integrated control, and operational simplicity. Cisco Intersight stands out with cloud-based management, advanced automation, and analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS Manager users seek more intuitive controls, enhanced third-party integration, and improved user interfaces. Cisco Intersight users desire more granular control features, better performance reporting, and expanded functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Manager is recognized for straightforward deployment and comprehensive customer service. Cisco Intersight benefits from a simplified cloud-native deployment, though users report a steeper learning curve and suggest improvements in aligning customer service with user needs.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Manager users are satisfied with affordable setup costs and favorable ROI. Cisco Intersight's setup is seen as more complex and costly, but its advanced features can justify the investment, offering significant ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Intersight vs. Cisco UCS Manager Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. Cisco UCS Manager

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Intersight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (12th)

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 2.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

David Fartouk

CTO at Trust-IT Solutions

Feb 21, 2024

Helps know whether a solution is deployed correctly, but the automation capabilities are difficult to use

We use the solution for server management across various locations With Intersight, it is pretty simple to manage all the environments. We don't really need to deploy any management solution. Intersight can validate our environment. It tells us if the environment has issues and whether they are…

Read full review

Joshua Kurian

Sr. Technical Architect at StarOne IT Solutions

Apr 8, 2024

Used to manage servers, monitor or manage firmware upgrades, and push policies

The solution's SDK and API can be integrated with ServiceNow for ticketing for any purpose. The solution's unified management interface is a central point of management that allows us to manage switches, blades, and storage connectors. One person is enough to maintain the solution. The speed of the network interface has been 100 G since day one. The network is scalable, and GPU nodes can be added seamlessly. Cisco is claiming to support water cooling in the near future. The solution can be easily integrated with other tools and platforms. Compared to Dell, Cisco UCS Manager provides straightforward configuration, reusable policies, and flexibility. Dell lacks a proper GUI for configuring everything. Cisco has only one GUI, which allows us to configure everything, including the network server and server profile. Before releasing each model, Cisco should conduct proper testing or engineering validation to ensure that the customer doesn't face any issues initially. Overall, I rate Cisco UCS Manager a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco Intersight has valuable features for workflow automation and inventory administration."

"Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up."

"What I like most about Cisco Intersight is its manageability."

"The product has good integration."

"We enjoy having an inside view of all the data centers and all the EdgeX nodes within a single portal rather than going into the EdgeX connections one by one."

"Our organization uses Cisco Intersight since it helps manage our physical infrastructure."

"Provides an overall view using a single portal."

"Intersight can validate our environment."

More Cisco Intersight pros

"From a usability and functionality perspective, Cisco UCS Manager is very good."

"The solution is highly scalable, mainly because of the templates that make it easy for you to actually edit on the system."

"We can configure the Cisco UCS Manager, the profiles and interactions with the resource we manage."

"The hardware is very powerful and it is a stable solution."

"The most valuable features are flexibility and management."

"The reporting functionality will give you any report you want."

"Ease of management is certainly the most valuable feature in this product."

"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

Cons

"The solution needs some enhancement in order to build the cluster in two nodes."

"When new features are added, the service becomes full of bugs."

"The unique problem with Cisco Intersight is that it's not supporting some players."

"In the future, the solution needs to plan on an extension to cover a broader range of objects since, at present, there are some Cisco devices within the range of Intersight UCS that it can't manage."

"It's a very complex solution."

"The usability must be better."

"The product could be easy to use."

"The product's setup should be easier."

More Cisco Intersight cons

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"Cisco UCS Manager should have a simplified deployment in the sense of not having multiple machines, demilitarized zones, and on-premise options."

"Getting a CLI report on routers, switches, or any other CLI configuration device is difficult."

"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."

"What's lacking in Cisco UCS Manager is the performance dashboard. If a blade has any performance issues, you should be able to create a dashboard on Cisco UCS Manager. Currently, this feature isn't present."

"There is room for improvement in the software part of Cisco UCS Manager. It should be more user-friendly, especially when creating policies."

"The automation within the solution needs to be simplified."

"Improving functionalities similar to InterSite within UCS Manager would be beneficial."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."

"It's just the standard licensing cost. There are no additional fees."

"Cisco Intersight is not cheap, but it's not the most expensive product either."

"The product is cost-effective."

"Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

43%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

32%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Intersight?

Intersight can validate our environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?

We used the solution's automation capabilities, but it wasn’t easy. It was part of why we took some time to deploy the solution. It didn't give us much value. It wasn't that good. Intersight is a p...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?

We use the solution for server management across various locations.

See all answers

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

Cisco is the most expensive compared to other vendors like Dell and HP when it comes to data center solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

There are options that could make configuration and administration easier. Improving functionalities similar to InterSite within UCS Manager would be beneficial.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 8% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 6% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Intersight Competitors

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 14% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight

November 2024

Download Cisco Intersight product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

November 2024

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Also Known As

Intersight

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

Cisco

Overview

Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Sample Customers

EXMAR, RapidScale

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. Cisco UCS Manager

October 2024

Free Report: Cisco Intersight vs. Cisco UCS Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight vs. Cisco UCS Manager and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Intersight vs. Cisco UCS Manager report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.