Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Cisco Intersight delivers ROI through reduced workload and costs, fewer personnel needs, and efficiency gains in network management.
Sentiment score
5.8
Cisco UCS Manager enhances ROI by reducing hardware faults, centralizing management, offering integrations, though initial assessments are crucial.
I can manage all LAN uplinks and fiber channel storage uplinks directly from UCS Manager.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Cisco Intersight's support is praised for professionalism and availability, though access to the right engineer can vary.
Sentiment score
8.1
Cisco's technical support is praised for reliability and efficiency, although urgent support can be inconsistent outside UCS Manager.
For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX.
Cisco provides better support than anyone else.
For a severity one case, a call ensures immediate assistance and resolution of the matter.
Regarding Cisco tech, they are pretty good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Cisco Intersight is scalable, easy to adjust, requires minimal maintenance, and supports growth, fitting diverse organizational needs.
Sentiment score
7.6
Cisco UCS Manager is praised for scalability via templates, though hardware limits may require additional managers and memory costs.
Adding new chassis and extra blades is streamlined.
I would rate the scalability at nine out of ten, probably.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Cisco Intersight is generally stable with some version-specific reliability issues; upgrades and documentation gaps pose occasional challenges.
Sentiment score
7.5
Cisco UCS Manager is stable, highly rated, with occasional issues resolved by updates and responsive Cisco support.
Some steps are not included in the official documentation, which can create challenges.
If there's a really complex problem, I would probably give it a ten since it gets escalated quickly.
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco Intersight needs improved stability, automation, and compatibility to compete with VMware Tanzu in hybrid cloud management.
Cisco UCS Manager needs simpler integration, better training, improved GUI, and cost-effective enhancements to attract smaller businesses.
There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment.
More products should be made compatible with iWORK, including more software and hardware.
It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing.
While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the tabs would enhance user experience.
 

Setup Cost

Cisco Intersight's pricing is competitive, straightforward, and generally rated positively, with free basic monitoring and paid advanced features.
Cisco UCS Manager is valued for reliability but is costly, with licensing and features increasing overall expenses despite discounts.
The pricing mechanism sounds fair.
Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offers like buying three servers and getting one free, along with UCSC and fabric included for free.
As long as they can afford it, there is a setup cost involved.
 

Valuable Features

Cisco Intersight excels in integration, scalability, and management, offering automation and analytics for efficient infrastructure optimization.
Cisco UCS Manager offers unified management, ease of administration, centralized control, and high availability with user-friendly interfaces and efficient features.
This solution has provided time savings and required fewer people to operate this tool, rather than direct cost savings.
It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure.
It offers visibility and optimization of workloads, which are very important features for a company.
Whenever there's a failure of any component, it's very easy to swap because you just disassociate that profile, remove the faulty blade, connect the new blade, and associate that profile, maintaining the same MAC address and worldwide port name.
One of the valuable features is the user interface base, specifically the C user interface.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Intersight
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (12th)
Cisco UCS Manager
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
17th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

ItzikLiberman - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides data center management and full infrastructure visibility
Cisco Intersight is a very effective tool for data center infrastructure management. It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure. We have visibility to other products and storages, some networking. It is also valuable for its integration capabilities with other products.
Edwin Mwosa - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency
We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
38%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
Computer Software Company
28%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Intersight?
Intersight can validate our environment.
What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?
I use it mostly for managing servers and updating their hardware licenses to get the hardware status in the cloud. Mostly, my customers develop Intersight on-premises because there are many restric...
What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?
When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?
As long as they can afford it, there is a setup cost involved.
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?
There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite ...
 

Also Known As

Intersight
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

EXMAR, RapidScale
Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight vs. Cisco UCS Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.