Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco UCS Manager Logo

Top 10 Cisco UCS Manager Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco
4.0 out of 5
932 followers
Post review

Top Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco UCS Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and SolarWinds NPM. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog is known for comprehensive monitoring and ease of use, offering flexible pricing and positive ROI for small to medium enterprises. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager excels in detailed configurability for large-scale operations, justifying its higher cost with robust infrastructure management and advanced features.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. Datadog Report
Datadog typically has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco UCS Manager, which is more affordable for initial implementation. Datadog's robust features contribute to its increased expense, whereas Cisco UCS Manager's focus on essential management makes it less costly.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog typically has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco UCS Manager, which is more affordable for initial implementation. Datadog's robust features contribute to its increased expense, whereas Cisco UCS Manager's focus on essential management makes it less costly.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
Zabbix offers a no-cost, customizable monitoring solution, excelling in open-source flexibility and community support. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager provides robust hardware management and reliable support, appealing to users who prioritize strong hardware integration despite higher investment and deployment complexity.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a cost-effective setup with straightforward integration, while Cisco UCS Manager includes higher initial expenses due to its advanced hardware compatibility.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a cost-effective setup with straightforward integration, while Cisco UCS Manager includes higher initial expenses due to its advanced hardware compatibility.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM attracts tech buyers with its network management flexibility, while Cisco UCS Manager's server orchestration is essential for comprehensive infrastructure oversight. In comparison, SolarWinds' scalability and feature selection are ideal for network-focused organizations, whereas Cisco UCS appeals to those seeking robust server management.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM involves a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco UCS Manager tends to incur higher initial expenses. SolarWinds is often seen as more budget-friendly compared to Cisco's higher cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM involves a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco UCS Manager tends to incur higher initial expenses. SolarWinds is often seen as more budget-friendly compared to Cisco's higher cost structure.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels with customizable alerts and comprehensive reporting, while Cisco UCS Manager stands out with advanced hardware management and integration with Cisco products. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor is valued for cost-effectiveness, whereas Cisco UCS Manager is seen as a valuable long-term investment.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a low upfront setup cost, making it accessible for smaller budgets, while Cisco UCS Manager typically involves higher initial expenditure due to its enterprise-scale functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a low upfront setup cost, making it accessible for smaller budgets, while Cisco UCS Manager typically involves higher initial expenditure due to its enterprise-scale functionalities.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI excels in flexibility and customization, appealing to cost-conscious users with its low upfront investment. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager is praised for its reliability and integrated infrastructure management, suited for buyers seeking robust solutions despite a steeper learning curve.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. Nagios XI Report
Nagios XI incurs a moderate setup cost, while Cisco UCS Manager is known for a relatively lower initial expense. This highlights a clear difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI incurs a moderate setup cost, while Cisco UCS Manager is known for a relatively lower initial expense. This highlights a clear difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager excels in unified infrastructure management with advanced configurability for IT environments. In comparison, LogicMonitor specializes in customizable monitoring with user-friendly dashboards. Cisco provides robust hardware integration, while LogicMonitor offers cost-effective monitoring solutions adaptable to various infrastructures.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. LogicMonitor Report
Cisco UCS Manager features a cost-effective setup process, while LogicMonitor presents a higher initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS Manager features a cost-effective setup process, while LogicMonitor presents a higher initial cost.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager excels in scalability and compatibility with existing infrastructures, making it a strong choice for on-premises management. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers superior integration and cloud deployment options, appealing to enterprises needing flexible IT service management.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
Cisco UCS Manager has an expensive setup cost compared to ServiceNow IT Operations Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This significant difference highlights varying financial commitments for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS Manager has an expensive setup cost compared to ServiceNow IT Operations Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This significant difference highlights varying financial commitments for organizations.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager unifies compute, networking, and storage, offering software-defined capabilities and robust infrastructure compatibility. In comparison, Checkmk excels in automatic discovery and strong monitoring, making it ideal for complex environments with needs like frequent power outages and reliable alerting functions.
Download Checkmk vs. Cisco UCS Manager Report
Cisco UCS Manager's setup cost is viewed as high upfront, offering robust features, while Checkmk is praised for a lower initial investment with efficient monitoring capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS Manager's setup cost is viewed as high upfront, offering robust features, while Checkmk is praised for a lower initial investment with efficient monitoring capabilities.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
3.8 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager excels in storage, compute, and networking management with centralized maintenance. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications enhances virtualization across environments with strong monitoring features. Cisco emphasizes simplicity and support, while VMware focuses on comprehensive cloud visibility and container integration.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Cisco UCS Manager has a straightforward setup cost, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a more flexible pricing structure, highlighting key differences in deployment complexity and budget predictability.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS Manager has a straightforward setup cost, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a more flexible pricing structure, highlighting key differences in deployment complexity and budget predictability.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne NPM offers agentless infrastructure visibility, comprehensive monitoring, and high customization. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager integrates compute and networking management, focusing on Cisco environments. SevOne provides flexible pricing, whereas UCS Manager offers bundled value within its infrastructure.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Report
IBM SevOne NPM has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco UCS Manager, which offers a more cost-effective implementation for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne NPM has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco UCS Manager, which offers a more cost-effective implementation for initial deployment.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
HPE OneView
3.9 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
HPE OneView
3.9 out of 5
HPE OneView provides robust automation and time-saving management features appealing to businesses seeking enhanced control. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager delivers flexibility with strong server management and configuration capabilities, making it an attractive option for those prioritizing equipment management flexibility and comprehensive infrastructure oversight.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. HPE OneView Report
HPE OneView generally features a more straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco UCS Manager often involves a more complex initial configuration. Users frequently notice a higher level of customization available with Cisco UCS Manager compared to HPE OneView.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE OneView generally features a more straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco UCS Manager often involves a more complex initial configuration. Users frequently notice a higher level of customization available with Cisco UCS Manager compared to HPE OneView.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager excels in support and deployment, offering budget-friendly solutions with streamlined server management. In comparison, Moogsoft's AI-driven event management and noise reduction capabilities provide sophisticated insights. Cisco UCS Manager is appreciated for easy deployment, while Moogsoft's advanced features justify its higher complexity.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. Moogsoft Report
Cisco UCS Manager has an initial setup cost that is typically higher, while Moogsoft generally offers a more economical setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS Manager has an initial setup cost that is typically higher, while Moogsoft generally offers a more economical setup expense.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
vRealize Network Insight
4.3 out of 5
vRealize Network Insight offers network visualization and traffic analysis tools for application migration insights. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager integrates network, storage, and compute management. vRealize Network Insight is praised for insights while Cisco UCS Manager provides flexibility and reliability in infrastructure management.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. vRealize Network Insight Report
vRealize Network Insight typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Cisco UCS Manager, highlighting a clear cost difference for those assessing budget constraints between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
vRealize Network Insight typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Cisco UCS Manager, highlighting a clear cost difference for those assessing budget constraints between the two solutions.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.0 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.0 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager offers integrated control over network and server resources, ideal for those managing hybrid environments. In comparison, Dell CloudIQ focuses on proactive performance monitoring and analytics, suited for users seeking advanced cloud insights and streamlined, cloud-native deployment.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. Dell CloudIQ Report
Cisco UCS Manager involves a significant initial investment, while Dell CloudIQ has a more economical setup cost, highlighting the financial differences between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS Manager involves a significant initial investment, while Dell CloudIQ has a more economical setup cost, highlighting the financial differences between the two solutions.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Opsview
4.3 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Opsview
4.3 out of 5
Opsview is favored for budget-friendly pricing and strong support, catering to hybrid IT needs with versatility. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager appeals to enterprises requiring deep hardware integration and robust features, justifying its cost through comprehensive control over resources.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. Opsview Report
Opsview has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco UCS Manager tends to incur higher initial expenses. The primary distinction lies in the cost-effectiveness of Opsview compared to the more expensive setup process of Cisco UCS Manager.
View comparison
Pricing
Opsview has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco UCS Manager tends to incur higher initial expenses. The primary distinction lies in the cost-effectiveness of Opsview compared to the more expensive setup process of Cisco UCS Manager.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
AppDynamics Server Monitoring
4.1 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager focuses on simplifying hardware management and has strong infrastructure control. In comparison, AppDynamics Server Monitoring excels in performance tracking and real-time analytics. Cisco UCS offers robust technical support, while AppDynamics provides flexible deployment, including hybrid and cloud environments.
Download AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs. Cisco UCS Manager Report
Cisco UCS Manager offers a more straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while AppDynamics Server Monitoring can require a more complex setup with potentially higher costs. These differences highlight distinct initial investment levels for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco UCS Manager offers a more straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while AppDynamics Server Monitoring can require a more complex setup with potentially higher costs. These differences highlight distinct initial investment levels for each solution.
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Huawei iBMC
1 out of 5
Cisco UCS Manager Logo
Huawei iBMC
1 out of 5

The core of server management, iBMC, uses the Hi1710 BMC chip developed by Huawei to provide refined management and control for servers. iBMC adopts multiple innovative technologies and maximizes RAS features — all to improve server reliability, availability, and serviceability.

View comparison

Related categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software