Cisco UCS Manager vs Datadog comparison

Read 187 Datadog reviews

11,642 Views
6,919 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Datadog and Cisco UCS Manager compete in monitoring and analytics versus computing resource management respectively. Datadog generally has the upper hand in ease of deployment and user satisfaction, while Cisco UCS Manager is more favored for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Datadog users highlight robust monitoring capabilities, extensive integration options, and real-time analytics. Cisco UCS Manager users value efficient resource management, high scalability, and flexibility for managing large-scale environments.

Room for Improvement: Datadog users suggest enhancing customization of dashboards, reducing costs, and improving existing features. Cisco UCS Manager users recommend streamlining the setup process, better user documentation, and making the interface more intuitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog offers seamless deployment and strong customer support, making it simpler and quicker to set up. Cisco UCS Manager has a more complex deployment process, but comprehensive support aids in resolving issues.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog's setup costs are regarded as high, but users feel the ROI is justified by the performance and capabilities. Cisco UCS Manager has significant setup costs but offers ROI through improved efficiency and resource management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. Datadog Report (Updated: October 2024).

Cisco UCS Manager vs. Datadog

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

187

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (2nd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 5.8%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Joshua Kurian

Sr. Technical Architect at StarOne IT Solutions

Apr 8, 2024

Used to manage servers, monitor or manage firmware upgrades, and push policies

The solution's SDK and API can be integrated with ServiceNow for ticketing for any purpose. The solution's unified management interface is a central point of management that allows us to manage switches, blades, and storage connectors. One person is enough to maintain the solution. The speed of the network interface has been 100 G since day one. The network is scalable, and GPU nodes can be added seamlessly. Cisco is claiming to support water cooling in the near future. The solution can be easily integrated with other tools and platforms. Compared to Dell, Cisco UCS Manager provides straightforward configuration, reusable policies, and flexibility. Dell lacks a proper GUI for configuring everything. Cisco has only one GUI, which allows us to configure everything, including the network server and server profile. Before releasing each model, Cisco should conduct proper testing or engineering validation to ensure that the customer doesn't face any issues initially. Overall, I rate Cisco UCS Manager a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Kevin Palmer

DevOps/Security Principal at Raken

Sep 19, 2024

Useful log aggregation and management with helpful metrics aggregation

Datadog provides us value in three major ways: First, Datadog provides best-in-class functionality in many, if not all, of the products to which we subscribe (infrastructure, APM, log management, serverless, synthetics, real user monitoring, DB monitoring). In my experience with other tools that provide similar functionality, Datadog provides the largest feature set with the most flexibility and the best performance. Second, Datadog allows us to access all of those services in one place. Having to learn and manage only one tool for all of those purposes is a major benefit. Third, Datadog provides significant connectivity between those services so that we can view, summarize, organize, translate and correlate our data with maximum effect. Not needing to manually integrate them to draw lines between those pieces of information is a huge time savings for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reporting functionality will give you any report you want."

"I can quickly manage the provisioned servers."

"The hardware is very powerful and it is a stable solution."

"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."

"Cisco Infrastructure is one of the top vendors and no one can beat them in terms of switching and routing."

"I can deploy something in my 50-odd servers all in one go, in parallel, whereas if I was to do that individually, it could be a nightmare."

"Technical support has been good so far. We haven't had any issues with them. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide our company."

"The solution is highly scalable, mainly because of the templates that make it easy for you to actually edit on the system."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"The flexibility to create notebooks and dashboards and fully customize them gives us a lot of power to track the exact services and endpoints we are working on."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboards that are provided out of the box, as well as ones we were able to configure."

"The selection of monitors is a big feature I have been working with."

"The feature I've found most valuable is the log search feature."

"Going from viewing a metric to creating a monitor alerting on a metric is very easy."

"Datadog has a lot of features to be able to drill down deep into the swath of logs that our platforms generate."

"The ability to send notifications based on metadata from the monitor is helpful."

"I really enjoy the RUM monitoring features of Datadog. It allows us to monitor user behavior in a way we couldn't before."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"The integration with other solutions could be better. I think Cisco can only integrate using Intersight. There is a second interface available as a SaaS platform, in the cloud, or on-premise. It's based on the Redfish protocol, which is standard for all the B-series servers in the market. We can integrate other solutions using API."

"The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced."

"Cisco UCS Manager should have a simplified deployment in the sense of not having multiple machines, demilitarized zones, and on-premise options."

"What's lacking in Cisco UCS Manager is the performance dashboard. If a blade has any performance issues, you should be able to create a dashboard on Cisco UCS Manager. Currently, this feature isn't present."

"I would like to see Cisco UCS optionally work as a hyper-converged system because right now, it only operates as a converged system."

"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."

"Getting a CLI report on routers, switches, or any other CLI configuration device is difficult."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"It would be great if usage metrics were automatically created and we could create custom metrics, instead we ended up building some of our own stuff to track and alert on our own usage."

"Another issue that I have is with the search syntax, it could be simpler and it feels like there are too many ways to do the same things."

"The current way accounts are billed could be vastly improved - especially when involving multiple organizations across multiple accounts in combination with reserved commitments."

"I would like better navigability across pages."

"The pricing model could be simplified as it feels a bit outdated, especially when you look at the billing model of compute instances vs the containers instances."

"It is far too easy to run up huge unexpected costs."

"Once Datadog has gained wide adoption, it can often be overwhelming to both know and understand where to go to find answers to questions."

"For three to four months, we have been experiencing real-time delays. For example, if we're monitoring incoming traffic, the real-time status should be displayed up to a certain point. However, due to delays or issues with Datadog, the real-time data might only be updated at an earlier time. We are experiencing consistent delays in data updates from Datadog, with the most recent data often being delayed by about an hour. This issue has been ongoing for the past four months."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"The tool is open-source."

"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."

"Sometimes it's very hard to project how much it will cost for the monthly subscription for the next month when you add certain features. Having better visibility of the cost would give a better experience."

"Pricing seemed easy until the bill came in and some things were not accounted for."

"The pricing came up a bit compared to their competitors. It is not that the price has risen, but that the competitors have gone down. They keep adding more features that I would have expected to be baked in at a more nominal price. I have been increasingly dissatisfied with the pricing, but not enough to jump ship."

"They prefer monthly subscriptions."

"It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost."

"It didn't scale well from the cost perspective. We had a custom package deal."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

32%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

36%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

Cisco is the most expensive compared to other vendors like Dell and HP when it comes to data center solutions.

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

There are options that could make configuration and administration easier. Improving functionalities similar to InterSite within UCS Manager would be beneficial.

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Comparisons

Compared 80% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 14% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 14% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 7% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Cisco UCS Manager

November 2024

Download Datadog product report

November 2024

Learn More

Cisco

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.

Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.

What are the key features of Datadog?

Graphs and Dashboards: Visualizes servers and infrastructure with customizable views.
Metrics: Offers deep insights into system performance and user behavior.
Log Management: Provides powerful analytics for logs and seamless log aggregation.
Unified Tagging: Facilitates organization and retrieval of metrics and logs.
APM and RUM: Enables application performance monitoring and real user monitoring for comprehensive insights.
Synthetic Testing: Allows the simulation of user interactions to test application performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

System Reliability: Helps ensure uptime and performance across cloud environments.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Assists in identifying and resolving issues before they impact users.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and log management tasks.
Flexible Integrations: Adapts to various cloud services and infrastructure setups.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications to address problems swiftly.

Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's