Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco UCS Manager vs Datadog comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
3.5
Users report mixed ROI with Cisco UCS Manager; success depends on effective integration and proper alignment with project goals.
Sentiment score
7.2
Datadog enhances efficiency and operational visibility, with benefits like reduced downtime, improved issue resolution, and significant labor savings.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Cisco UCS Manager's customer service is praised for responsiveness and reliability, though upgrade challenges and ticket issues exist.
Sentiment score
7.3
Datadog's customer service is responsive and helpful but can be inconsistent in response times and communication effectiveness.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Cisco UCS Manager offers scalability for various-sized businesses, though limitations and hardware costs may affect large-scale deployments.
Sentiment score
7.6
Datadog excels in scalability and integration, handling diverse workloads efficiently, though costs may rise with growth.
I would rate the scalability at nine out of ten, probably.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Cisco UCS Manager is praised for stability and support, with minor issues resolved by updates and responsive customer service.
Sentiment score
8.0
Datadog is praised for strong stability, reliable uptime, quick issue resolution, and excellent performance, ensuring consistent monitoring.
If there's a really complex problem, I would probably give it a ten since it gets escalated quickly.
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco UCS Manager requires improvements in integration, user interface, security, scalability, and pricing to reduce complexity and enhance deployment.
Datadog requires enhancements in performance, simplicity, cost management, customization, integration, documentation, and user experience for improved functionality.
It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
There should be a clearer view of the expenses.
 

Setup Cost

Cisco UCS Manager is costly but valued for reliability and bundled features; licensing and support are essential factors increasing total expense.
Enterprise buyers find Datadog's value reasonable but must manage usage to avoid unpredictable costs with its pay-as-you-go model.
As long as they can afford it, there is a setup cost involved.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
 

Valuable Features

Cisco UCS Manager unifies storage, networking, and compute, offering ease of deployment, management, security, and operational efficiency.
Datadog centralizes data for analysis, enhancing reliability and performance with comprehensive observability, monitoring, and alert systems.
One of the valuable features is the user interface base, specifically the C user interface.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
The technology itself is generally very useful.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
17th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Datadog
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
188
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (3rd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 5.6%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Edwin Mwosa - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency
We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…
Kevin Palmer - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful log aggregation and management with helpful metrics aggregation
Datadog provides us value in three major ways: First, Datadog provides best-in-class functionality in many, if not all, of the products to which we subscribe (infrastructure, APM, log management, serverless, synthetics, real user monitoring, DB monitoring). In my experience with other tools that provide similar functionality, Datadog provides the largest feature set with the most flexibility and the best performance. Second, Datadog allows us to access all of those services in one place. Having to learn and manage only one tool for all of those purposes is a major benefit. Third, Datadog provides significant connectivity between those services so that we can view, summarize, organize, translate and correlate our data with maximum effect. Not needing to manually integrate them to draw lines between those pieces of information is a huge time savings for us.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
30%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?
When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?
The licensing cost for Cisco UCS Manager is around four out of ten. It is not cost-effective due to its high price, especially regarding memory expansion.
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?
An area for improvement is the memory expansion of these blades, which is very expensive. The pricing aspect should be addressed.
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...
Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals
Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. Datadog and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.