Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) vs Zerto comparison

Commvault and Zerto are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Commvault is ranked #36 with an average rating of 9.0, while Zerto is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.9. Commvault holds a 0.1% mindshare in CB, compared to Zerto’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Commvault users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zerto users who would recommend it.

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

Read 1 Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) review

78 Views
45 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zerto

Read 298 Zerto reviews

8,122 Views
3,967 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

Zerto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 26, 2025

Zerto and Cloud Rewind compete in the disaster recovery and backup space. Cloud Rewind stands out for its comprehensive features justifying its cost, attracting those seeking enhanced cloud data management solutions.

Features: Zerto provides continuous data protection, real-time disaster recovery abilities, and seamless multi-platform support. Cloud Rewind offers cloud-native, automated backup and recovery, cloud service integration for improved scalability, and resilience enhancing features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloud Rewind leverages automated deployment within cloud environments with responsive cloud-centric support. Zerto offers flexible deployment across hybrid infrastructures with comprehensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Zerto presents a cost-effective solution with significant ROI due to reduced downtime. Cloud Rewind's pricing reflects its feature set, providing considerable ROI for enterprises expanding in the cloud.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Backup Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

Ranking in Cloud Backup

36th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (22nd), AWS Marketplace (38th)

Zerto

Ranking in Cloud Backup

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

298

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (4th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zerto is 4.2%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

reviewer1370448

Ecosystem Solution Architect Lead for UK, Ireland, Arfica at Accenture

Provides operational efficiencies and recovers virtual instances quickly

For our clients, we use the solution to protect their virtual instances and instantly recover them in the event of a compromise The solution has provided operational efficiencies. The platform's most effective feature is quickly recovering virtual instances into a separate environment. They…

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features

Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most effective feature is quickly recovering virtual instances into a separate environment."

"Zerto provides our customers with the ability to continue work, even if something happens to their office or data center."

"Some of the most valuable features are the synchronous replication and migration with RDMs. I really like the conversion of RDM VMs for migration."

"I prefer Zerto because it's a little more automated. VMware has more requirements... It's a little more click-and-go versus click-and-monitor..."

"The customer service and support are very good. Every time we have problems, they're ready to help us."

"I found VM level replication and being able to group the VM levels to be valuable. I like not having to worry about whether a particular VM is in the right storage group; some of those sorts of things would trip us up previously."

"The product is superior compared to the other vendors."

"Zerto's ease of use is outstanding; it's easy to set up and has a clear interface and menus. The reporting, analytics, and online monitoring are also excellent."

"Zerto helped our organization meet compliance requirements by ensuring data protection and recovery strategies align with our regulatory standards."

More Zerto pros

Cons

"They could add more intelligence features in the workflow through automation."

"Their offsite backup is a bit clunky, but it will probably improve."

"It's pretty expensive per server."

"I would rate them an eight out of ten because not every response is as we expect. They do resolve the issue, but sometimes customers have unusual questions, and they are not able to say how exactly to fix that or how to do something,."

"Zerto requires these thick provision walls for virtual machines that are always running."

"Near-synchronous replication has some trade-offs."

"Zerto should add the capability to replicate the same VM to multiple sites."

"When we migrated to new virtual infrastructure, we had to set up Zerto all over again. And that took a long time. It would be nice if Zerto had some sort of migration tool where you could migrate all of your virtual machines to a new infrastructure without having to set up Zerto all over again."

"The improvement that I would like to see is a little bit easier product knowledge, things like that. It's getting a lot better than it was before because it's not as old of a product as Cisco, but if you look for something like Cisco routing and networking, you'll find millions of articles out there and it's everywhere."

More Zerto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The additional cost is cloud storage, which the public cloud provider charges."

"In a world where others are catching up, e.g., VMware High Availability, there needs to be a less expensive option as well. When a customer has approximately 100 VMs, if you multiply by 40, we aren't charging a very high margin on it at all since the license is so expensive. We feel their pain. That is the most expensive part of it. The storage, CPU, and RAM are a lot less. It is the licensing that is really expensive. Whereas, with an option like VMware High Availability, it is a couple dollars per month. That is our spend that we are charged by VMware, then our margin is higher on those VMs. Giving us some ability to have higher margins, as an MSP, would be a good thing."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The cost per VM is a bit high."

"Having backup and DR is somewhat moderately important to us. The problem with us, and a lot of companies, is the issue with on-prem Zerto. It utilizes whatever you have for a SAN. Or, if you are like us, we have a vSAN and that storage is not cheap. So, it is cheaper to have a self-contained backup system that is on its own storage rather than utilizing your data center storage, like your vSAN. While it is somewhat important to have both backup and DR, it is not incredibly important to have both. I know Zero is trying to heavily dip their toes in the water of backup and recovery. Once you see what Zerto can do, I don't think anyone will not take Zerto because they don't necessarily specialize in backup and recovery 100 percent. They do replication so well."

"As far as I know, the pricing is around $1,000 per VM, but Zerto is changing the pricing model to more of an enterprise-class license. I don't know if there are any additional costs or fees."

"I would like to see different service levels. They're good, but it still takes a lot of our budget in ops."

"I wish it were cheaper, but I would purchase it again at the same price."

"The cost is not dirt cheap but also is not terrible."

More Zerto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

I rate the product pricing a seven. The additional cost is cloud storage, which the public cloud provider charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

They could add more intelligence features in the workflow through automation, removing more of the human element. Additionally, improvements in the reporting features would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

For our clients, we use the solution to protect their virtual instances and instantly recover them in the event of a compromise.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

Zerto is definitely more costly compared to its competitors, such as VMware Site Recovery Manager. It may not be suitable for small and medium-sized industries.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Veeam Data Platform vs Zerto

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Zerto

Compared 14% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Zerto

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs Zerto

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Zerto

Compared 6% of the time

More Zerto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

March 2025

Download Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) product report

Buyer's Guide

Zerto

March 2025

Download Zerto product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) offers organizations reliable protection and recovery solutions, catering to complex business continuity needs. Its comprehensive features support system resilience and integrity, making it ideal for experienced IT professionals seeking robust data management capabilities.

Cloud Rewind enables streamlined data protection and disaster recovery processes. Designed to simplify backup and recovery tasks, it automates policies across multi-cloud environments, safeguarding data against disruptions. With its user-centric design, it provides businesses with the confidence to manage their cloud-based data securely, providing a seamless integration into existing IT infrastructures while maintaining efficiency.

What are the key features of Cloud Rewind?

Automated Disaster Recovery: Facilitates quick recovery with predefined plans, reducing downtime.
Multi-Cloud Support: Integrates smoothly with multiple cloud platforms for synchronized data management.
Policy Automation: Automates backup and recovery tasks based on user-defined rules, enhancing reliability.
Customized Alerts: Notifies users promptly of any issues, helping maintain operational continuity.

What benefits and ROI are expected from Cloud Rewind?

Reduced Downtime: Minimizes disruptions with rapid restoration strategies, enhancing productivity.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs by optimizing backup processes and resource allocation.
Scalability: Adapts to organizational growth, ensuring consistent data protection irrespective of size.
Enhanced Security: Offers robust data protection that helps mitigate risks associated with data loss.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail use Cloud Rewind to ensure critical data is protected and easily recoverable, addressing stringent compliance demands. Its deployment in these sectors exemplifies its adaptability and relevance in safeguarding sensitive information across demanding environments.

Commvault

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Zerto

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.