Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) vs Zerto comparison

Commvault and Zerto are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Commvault is ranked #38 with an average rating of 9.0, while Zerto is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8. Commvault holds a 0.1% mindshare in CB, compared to Zerto’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Commvault users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zerto users who would recommend it.

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

Read 1 Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) review

94 Views
50 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zerto

Read 299 Zerto reviews

8,092 Views
3,849 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

Zerto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 26, 2025

Zerto and Cloud Rewind compete in the disaster recovery and backup space. Cloud Rewind stands out for its comprehensive features justifying its cost, attracting those seeking enhanced cloud data management solutions.

Features: Zerto provides continuous data protection, real-time disaster recovery abilities, and seamless multi-platform support. Cloud Rewind offers cloud-native, automated backup and recovery, cloud service integration for improved scalability, and resilience enhancing features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloud Rewind leverages automated deployment within cloud environments with responsive cloud-centric support. Zerto offers flexible deployment across hybrid infrastructures with comprehensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Zerto presents a cost-effective solution with significant ROI due to reduced downtime. Cloud Rewind's pricing reflects its feature set, providing considerable ROI for enterprises expanding in the cloud.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Backup Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

Ranking in Cloud Backup

38th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (22nd), AWS Marketplace (42nd)

Zerto

Ranking in Cloud Backup

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

299

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (3rd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zerto is 4.1%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

reviewer1370448

Ecosystem Solution Architect Lead for UK, Ireland, Arfica at Accenture

Provides operational efficiencies and recovers virtual instances quickly

For our clients, we use the solution to protect their virtual instances and instantly recover them in the event of a compromise The solution has provided operational efficiencies. The platform's most effective feature is quickly recovering virtual instances into a separate environment. They…

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features

Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most effective feature is quickly recovering virtual instances into a separate environment."

"The test features have been really good for us. Our DR testing goes very quickly and easily now for all our stuff with Zerto. We have our priority recovery process, where we cover our databases for our app servers and web servers. All our teams pretty much get their VMs very quickly. The RPOs are very low."

"I am quite familiar with the user interface. It is easy for me to operate and perform different operations because I am an experienced user. In my opinion, the user interface is easy to understand and operate. The user interface is user-friendly."

"We have seen ROI. The biggest way that we have seen it is in avoided downtime. We have had outages before, and we count downtime in terms of dollars spent. We have cut that down so dramatically, which provides us a very quick ROI. We have drastically reduced the amount of time it takes us to recover workloads, from an average of two hours to an average of 10 minutes."

"The ability to have a RPO of seconds has enabled us to restore data to just before an incident has occurred, which certainly saves a lot of time and money."

"Our RTO is quick, and we can recover five to ten terabytes of data within minutes of a failover."

"The ease of use is one of the best features. Previously, we were using Site Replication Manager with VMware and it was a little bit cumbersome. With Zerto, we liked the fact that it was hardware-agnostic and we were able to spin it up pretty quickly and get it working."

"We can use Zerto to help protect our VMs."

"Zerto is an excellent solution for cloud-based environments, but for DIY clients who have another site to recover their systems it also works well."

More Zerto pros

Cons

"They could add more intelligence features in the workflow through automation."

"We would love to have a native management pack for vROps and to be able to view a dashboard and metrics for BPGs within vROps. We would like to have a single view for monitoring and provide customers with dashboards so they can see their own BPGs."

"We're not fully satisfied with the support team."

"Zerto's connectivity with automation platforms could be improved. For example, vCenter can use a VMware-developed tool called Site Recovery Manager. That can be integrated with automation platforms such as Terraform, Ansible, Chef, or Puppet, to perform automated, self-sufficient recoveries to essentially avoid any downtime. To my knowledge, Zerto does not have integration with those platforms."

"The limitation with Zerto is that you're required to have one Zerto Manager per virtual center, and this means that you're only able to replicate one way. Technical support for this product was fantastic, before they were acquired by HP. You're now able to tell that the company is becoming too big, in terms of the support they provide."

"In general, the solution is pretty good, but because it is geared toward simplicity, sometimes, when things go wrong, the answer is not very detailed so that things can be solved quickly. If things do go wrong, it does require a little bit deeper troubleshooting to resolve the issues. That's the only area where improvement could occur. There should be a little bit more details about if things go wrong, how to remedy them."

"It has a file restore feature, which we have tried to use. We have had some issues with that, because the drives are compressed in our main file system. It is a Windows-based file server. So, it compresses the shares and can't restore those by default."

"Some of the features need improvement. One would be, as you're creating a Move group or a VPG, as they call it, it should either autosave or have the ability so that you can save it for coming back to later because if the setup times out, you lose all your work. That would be a nice improvement to have."

"I need to get up to the latest version so I can move my journals to a particular LUN, saving them with a particular storage altogether, rather than with the virtual machine. This is not available until I upgrade, and I need to upgrade all my hypervisors. This would be something that would be nice to have if it could be used on older versions."

More Zerto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The additional cost is cloud storage, which the public cloud provider charges."

"Price-wise, it works fine for me, but my budgetary team is always looking for ways to cut costs, and it seems like they first look at the data center and the IT side to find savings."

"It's very reasonably priced. It's a little more than $3,000 annually. That works out to about $20 per server per month."

"Zerto's price seems fair. It's competitive."

"Zerto’s licensing model has changed a bit over the last year and they are in alignment with others. It is pretty simple and more economical."

"There is a lot of confusion with Zerto licensing. They have a migration license and a replication license. They should simplify the licensing process. The migration license costs a lot of money, and it is only on a one-time basis. If you use that license, it ties to that VM. I might re-migrate that VM in the next five to ten years. It is another environment, but my license is stuck there. The replication license is fine, and I have no issue with its pricing model, but they should simplify the migration license."

"We paid a big investment upfront with renewal fees each year."

"Zerto is slightly expensive, but we do see the value in it."

"Compared to other options like SRM, Zerto is a more expensive solution, making it primarily suitable for larger organizations."

More Zerto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

I rate the product pricing a seven. The additional cost is cloud storage, which the public cloud provider charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

They could add more intelligence features in the workflow through automation, removing more of the human element. Additionally, improvements in the reporting features would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

For our clients, we use the solution to protect their virtual instances and instantly recover them in the event of a compromise.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

Zerto is definitely more costly compared to its competitors, such as VMware Site Recovery Manager. It may not be suitable for small and medium-sized industries.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Veeam Data Platform vs Zerto

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Zerto

Compared 13% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Zerto

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs Zerto

Compared 8% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Zerto

Compared 6% of the time

More Zerto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

March 2025

Download Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) product report

Buyer's Guide

Zerto

March 2025

Download Zerto product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) offers organizations reliable protection and recovery solutions, catering to complex business continuity needs. Its comprehensive features support system resilience and integrity, making it ideal for experienced IT professionals seeking robust data management capabilities.

Cloud Rewind enables streamlined data protection and disaster recovery processes. Designed to simplify backup and recovery tasks, it automates policies across multi-cloud environments, safeguarding data against disruptions. With its user-centric design, it provides businesses with the confidence to manage their cloud-based data securely, providing a seamless integration into existing IT infrastructures while maintaining efficiency.

What are the key features of Cloud Rewind?

Automated Disaster Recovery: Facilitates quick recovery with predefined plans, reducing downtime.
Multi-Cloud Support: Integrates smoothly with multiple cloud platforms for synchronized data management.
Policy Automation: Automates backup and recovery tasks based on user-defined rules, enhancing reliability.
Customized Alerts: Notifies users promptly of any issues, helping maintain operational continuity.

What benefits and ROI are expected from Cloud Rewind?

Reduced Downtime: Minimizes disruptions with rapid restoration strategies, enhancing productivity.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs by optimizing backup processes and resource allocation.
Scalability: Adapts to organizational growth, ensuring consistent data protection irrespective of size.
Enhanced Security: Offers robust data protection that helps mitigate risks associated with data loss.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail use Cloud Rewind to ensure critical data is protected and easily recoverable, addressing stringent compliance demands. Its deployment in these sectors exemplifies its adaptability and relevance in safeguarding sensitive information across demanding environments.

Commvault

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Zerto

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.