Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Appvance AIQ Platform vs Automaton comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Appvance AIQ Platform
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
29th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
15th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (48th), Performance Testing Tools (21st), Load Testing Tools (23rd), Test Automation Tools (32nd), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (4th)
Automaton
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
42nd
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
18th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Appvance AIQ Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Automaton is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

it_user129477 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 23, 2015
Network Emulation allows for performance testing of geographically-distributed users.
It is a great performance testing tool. The most valuable feature of the tool is its Avatar technology. Scripting is really fast, compared to other tools. It works for almost all major protocols, platforms and browsers. It makes complex scenarios simple, and we need minimal custom coding. It also provides features for Network Emulation, which is quite helpful in testing the performance for geographically-distributed users. Appvance can provide information from end to end (back-end and front-end), which makes it surpass other tools. The tool provides protocol level as well as browser level response time. And it can be integrated with major monitoring tools. As it is a web-based tool, it makes it easy to access anywhere anytime. All the team members can access the common information easily.
Use Automaton?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
14%
Insurance Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Appvance
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Bell Canada, CBS, UBC, PepsiCo, 7-11, BenefitVision, Kabbage, Catalent Pharmaceuticals, McKesson, Veritas, Cherwell, QAT Global, Sony, SiriusXM, CoPart, Auto Parts Alliance, PPD
Schneider Electric, Orange, O2, IBM, JPMorgan Chase
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2024.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.