Aras Innovator vs Siemens PLM TeamCenter comparison

Aras and Siemens are both solutions in the PLM Tools category. Aras is ranked #6, while Siemens is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.5. Aras holds a 7.2% mindshare in PT, compared to Siemens’s 13.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aras users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Aras Innovator

Read 2 Aras Innovator reviews

564 Views
370 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Read 3 Siemens PLM TeamCenter reviews

838 Views
568 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aras Innovator

Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aras Innovator and Siemens PLM TeamCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two PLM Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Aras Innovator vs. Siemens PLM TeamCenter Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Aras Innovator vs. Siemens PLM TeamCenter

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Aras Innovator

Ranking in PLM Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Ranking in PLM Tools

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Collaborative Product Data Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the PLM Tools category, the mindshare of Aras Innovator is 7.2%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Siemens PLM TeamCenter is 13.8%, up from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PLM Tools

Featured Reviews

Kapil Raikar

Senior Manager – Development, PD, Data Virtulization at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Strong ability to customize, but require improvements to their BOM configuration

In the next release, I would like to see improvements to their BOM configuration. Aras would also benefit from better integration with other systems. The solution also needs better capabilities of the features it has. I am looking for it to have modeling, project planning, and MES capabilities as well as a built-in CAD tool.

Read full review

Naresh Kumar

Founder & Director at Hiindsight Group

It's good for highly complex enterprises in aerospace and defense

Setting up TeamCenter is complex. Every PLM is complex unless we're talking about cloud-based solutions, but those have fewer features. However, those are only suitable for small companies. The time needed to deploy depends on the expertise of the person installing it. We can do it in a couple of hours if it is an out-of-the-box installation. If customers deploy it themselves, it may take a few days. It also depends on the complexity of the system we are designing. The amount of employees needed also depends on the size of the company and its complexity. A massive company takes an army to run the solution, but a couple of people can make it work for a small company.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the ease of workflow configuration and customisation development."

"I love that Aras has a utility or tool that you can use online to extend Aras."

"I like the Teamcenter Requirements Manager. It also has a structure manager where you create an engineering bill of materials and manufacturing process planning. There is something like service lifecycle management. That is where the maintenance data is stored. There are multiple modules. ALM Polarion is also a Siemens solution. It is a separate product, but it's part of the Siemens portfolio."

"The product's most valuable features are patch and data management."

Cons

"Aras would also benefit from better integration with other systems."

"Better Manufacturing BOM management would be valuable."

"The product's web interface and setup process could be better."

"This solution works, but it has many issues. Smaller companies are coming up the cloud-based PLM solutions that may replace larger PLM companies like PTC or Siemens in the future. It has some performance problems, and the maintenance is too expensive. Recently, we completed a project, and it cost almost $6 million to upgrade."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is costly for small businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PLM Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

17%

Educational Organization

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Siemens PLM TeamCenter?

The product's most valuable features are patch and data management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Siemens PLM TeamCenter?

I rate Siemens PLM TeamCenter an eight on pricing. It is costly for small businesses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Siemens PLM TeamCenter?

The product's web interface and setup process could be better. Also, scalability and stability need to be improved. It could be easier to customize as well.

See all answers

Comparisons

PTC Windchill vs Aras Innovator

Compared 32% of the time

Oracle Agile PLM vs Aras Innovator

Compared 16% of the time

More Aras Innovator Competitors

PIM vs Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Agile PLM vs Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Compared 15% of the time

PTC Windchill vs Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Compared 13% of the time

Autodesk PLM 360 vs Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Compared 11% of the time

iBASEt Solumina vs Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Compared 10% of the time

More Siemens PLM TeamCenter Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aras Innovator vs. Siemens PLM TeamCenter

October 2024

Download Aras Innovator product report

Buyer's Guide

Aras Innovator vs. Siemens PLM TeamCenter

October 2024

Download Siemens PLM TeamCenter product report

Also Known As

No data available

PLM TeamCenter, Siemens TeamCenter

Learn More

Aras

Siemens

Overview

Aras Enterprise Open Source PLM software supports BOM, Document, Change management, workflow, CAD, Dashboards and BI.

Teamcenter software is a modern, adaptable product lifecycle management (PLM) system that connects people and processes, across functional silos, with a digital thread for innovation. The unmatched breadth and depth of the Teamcenter portfolio means that you can solve more of the tough challenges required to develop highly successful products. From the easy, intuitive Teamcenter user interface, people across the organization can take part in the product development process more easily than ever before.

Sample Customers

MEGA Brands, Spartan

Grammer, Sparkonix, Avcon Controls, Brose Group, Schlatter, Solaris Bus & Coach, TMD Technologies, Metalfor

Buyer's Guide

Aras Innovator vs. Siemens PLM TeamCenter

October 2024

Free Report: Aras Innovator vs. Siemens PLM TeamCenter

Find out what your peers are saying about Aras Innovator vs. Siemens PLM TeamCenter and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aras Innovator vs. Siemens PLM TeamCenter report.

See our list of best PLM Tools vendors.

We monitor all PLM Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.