ArcSight Intelligence and Elastic Security are two competitive security platforms with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Elastic Security appears to have an edge in feature-rich offerings, while ArcSight Intelligence receives consistently higher user satisfaction ratings overall. However, users often find Elastic Security's comprehensive features justify its cost.
Features: ArcSight Intelligence offers robust anomaly detection, correlation capabilities, and focused threat analytics. Elastic Security provides extensive integration options, real-time threat intelligence, and a broader feature set covering multiple security aspects.
Room for Improvement: ArcSight Intelligence needs better reporting, a more approachable learning curve, and reduced complexity. Elastic Security requires enhanced documentation, more user-friendly configuration processes, and improved support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Intelligence has a longer deployment time with considerable complexity but strong customer support. Elastic Security has a quicker, more flexible deployment process but struggles with timely support resolution.
Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Intelligence is costly but offers strong ROI for large-scale implementations. Elastic Security, while requiring investment, is seen as value for money given its extensive feature set and balanced cost-benefit ratio.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Support is prompt and helpful.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Elastic Security consumes a lot of resources, requiring a substantial deployment setup.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
The platform provides more visibility and requires less effort in monitoring.
Elastic Security is as flexible and configurable as Microsoft Sentinel.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
Empower your threat hunting team to pre-empt elusive attacks with anomaly detection powered by security AI to find insider threats, zero-day attacks, and APTs.
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
