Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] vs Aspera Managed File Transfer comparison

IBM and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Additionally, 75% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.
Aspera Managed File Transfer
Read 3 Aspera Managed File Transfer reviews
  • 963 Views
  • 672 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Aspera Managed File Transfer and AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Progress Software, Fortra and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,067 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Aspera Managed File Transfer
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (13th)
AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Michele Illiano - PeerSpot reviewer
Beneficial quick protocol, powerful, but limited use cases
Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand. The best way to propose a suite is to have an integrated suite where the customer could choose to license part of it. This solution could be one solution not two choices between 10 or 12 different solutions. The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is the communication protocol, which is fast. There are a lot of different clients that are offering features related to these fast protocols. It's possible to create one unique suite that can handle this base protocol. It will be quite easy to propose to the customers.
Read full review
Kyle Titus - PeerSpot reviewer
Always works, handles all types of load, and allows us to have S3 files as storage
Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops. There could be client software that you use to connect to the server. Generally, AWS doesn't provide one for you, so you have to use either your CLI, maybe your SSH CLI, or use some kind of desktop solution. I had to find a desktop app from a third party to run this. Our clients also do the same everywhere else, so it would be nice if the SFTP Gateway solution came with a client that anyone could download on their Mac, Windows, or any other machine.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Good user interface and ability to set up multiple file transfer jobs."
"The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is that it's an incredibly fast protocol, you can use all the bandwidth available. If I need to send large amounts of data this is the fastest protocol on the market. I have been using it for some minor projects and it is very powerful."
"Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time."
"Being able to have the S3 files as storage is most valuable. We can use S3 as storage instead of an SFTP server or a machine."
"The solution offers good data recovery."
"The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization."
 

Cons

"Deployment is complex and it was difficult to get support."
"Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand."
"The solution's pricing is high and should be reduced."
"The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled."
"Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops."
"Could be more automated, particularly for file transfers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is not an inexpensive solution. I am not aware of many competitors to determine how affordable the price is overall."
"It's $249 per month per instance. It's not great; it's pretty pricey. We've got multiple users on that one instance. If we had to build it by hand, we would win on cost there, but obviously, there is effort and time. In terms of the additional costs, they do have some specific pricing, but for our use case, we don't end up going over $249. They do specify in their pricing what they're charging for."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aspera Managed File Transfer?
Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Aspera Managed File Transfer?
The solution's pricing calculation needs revision to be more competitive
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Aspera Managed File Transfer?
Aspera Managed File Transfer has superior technology. Overall, I rate Aspera Managed File Transfer a nine out of ten.
See all answers
What do you like most about AWS Transfer for SFTP?
The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Transfer for SFTP?
The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for AWS Transfer for SFTP?
We have integrations with third-party systems that unfortunately make use of a very old-school, file-based protocol. Instead of an API or HTTP-based protocol where you make a request to an endpoint...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Aspera Managed File Transfer Logo
IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Aspera Managed File Transfer
Compared 77% of the time
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Aspera Managed File Transfer Logo
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Aspera Managed File Transfer
Compared 15% of the time
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs Aspera Managed File Transfer Logo
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs Aspera Managed File Transfer
Compared 9% of the time
More Aspera Managed File Transfer Competitors
Kiteworks vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
Kiteworks vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Compared 52% of the time
IBM Sterling File Gateway vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
IBM Sterling File Gateway vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Compared 16% of the time
MOVEit vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
MOVEit vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Compared 7% of the time
CA XCOM Data Transport vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
CA XCOM Data Transport vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Compared 6% of the time
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Logo
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]
Compared 5% of the time
More AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
November 2024
Aspera Managed File Transfer reportDownload Aspera Managed File Transfer product report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
November 2024
AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] reportDownload AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] product report
 

Learn More

IBM
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
 

Overview

IBM Aspera takes a different approach to tackling the challenges of big data movement over global WANs. Rather than optimize or accelerate data transfer, Aspera eliminates underlying bottlenecks by using its proprietary fasp technology that fully utilizes available network bandwidth to maximize speed and quickly scale up with no theoretical limit. Using fasp, transfers are secure end-to-end and are largely unaffected by file size, transfer distance, or network conditions, making transfer times up to 100Xs faster than TCP-based protocols.

IBM Aspera offers SaaS, on-prem, and hybrid solutions to meet the needs of modernizing infrastructures. All solutions offer robust security and compliance, intuitive file sharing, workflow automation, central administration, and real-time visibility. Quickly and easily initiate transfers across hybrid infrastructures, including support for cloud-to-cloud transfers. IBM Aspera offers unmatched transfer speeds, end-to-end security, reliability, and exceptional bandwidth control.

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

 

Sample Customers

Gwinnett County Public Schools, Evonik, Voith, BITMARCK, Oracle
Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Progress Software, Fortra and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.