Ataccama ONE Platform vs SAP Information Steward comparison

Ataccama and SAP are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Ataccama is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5. Ataccama holds a 7.6% mindshare in DQ, compared to SAP’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 6 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

534 Views
357 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Information Steward

Read 9 SAP Information Steward reviews

612 Views
327 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

SAP Information Steward

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

SAP Information Steward and Ataccama ONE Platform are competitors in the data management category. Ataccama ONE Platform appears to have the upper hand with its advanced features and comprehensive data management capabilities, which users find worth the investment.

Features: SAP Information Steward focuses on data governance and quality monitoring, emphasizing data profiling, metadata management, and user-friendly interfaces. Ataccama ONE Platform offers AI-driven data quality, metadata tagging, and a robust workflow structure that provides a holistic approach to automated data management across environments.

Room for Improvement: SAP Information Steward could benefit from enhanced flexibility and improved cloud capabilities. It might also need more intuitive integration processes. Ataccama ONE Platform could improve its interface to be more user-friendly for new users and optimize its data transformation capabilities. Additionally, better real-time support could enhance its overall usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Information Steward's traditional deployment model is familiar to many but lacks flexibility, though its customer service is responsive. Ataccama ONE Platform features modern cloud capabilities for greater scalability and flexibility, with efficient and helpful customer service noted by users.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Information Steward offers a predictable cost structure that suits budget-conscious buyers, delivering steady ROI. Ataccama ONE Platform, while involving a higher initial investment, provides substantial ROI due to its extensive features and potential for long-term gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Quality

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th), Data Governance (11th)

SAP Information Steward

Ranking in Data Quality

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 7.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Information Steward is 3.3%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

FranciscoSantos

Director at Pixel Studio PTY

Provides accurate data that is validated against a personalized reference tool

For most SAP customers, Information Steward is enough because it is able to build quality data rules to detect issues in the source systems like SAP HANA, Business Warehouse, or other systems. A business user can first organize their data into several data domains. For example, procurement, human resources, and logistics setup. The domains can build data quality dimensions where you can describe the kind of rule that you are going to use. The user then can immediately see if something is wrong with their data using traffic lights. Another great feature of SAP Information Steward is the accuracy that the content is followed by validating against the reference tool. With the solution, you are creating data quality dimensions. Within these dimensions, you are creating business data quality rules that are looking for specific fields. From these rules, you can create a scorecard. The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits. SAP tables have field names that are very cryptic, making them hard to understand the meaning of the fields. Metapedia helps describe these fields in business terms.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The data profiling was excellent, as was the ease of generating the dashboards."

"The solution is very fast."

"The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits."

"Setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary."

"Ability to collect information, monitor user access and to plan storage capacity."

"The Data Cleansing and the scorecard dashboard are very valuable. Additionally, the financial aspect of SAP Information Steward is very good. When a rule is incorrect then it will show how much is it costing the business. These features are very valuable."

"Data insight is the most valuable feature."

More SAP Information Steward pros

Cons

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"Data movement is a pain."

"Needs to be more powerful on rules."

"A problem with the solution is that it does not allow us to review the results of Information Stewards for other analogies."

"Performance could be improved."

"Granularity could be reduced from an application level to the object level."

"The support team is not very responsive."

"The user experience of metapedia could be improved."

"SAP Information Steward could be improved by offering a cloud version of the product."

"We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward."

More SAP Information Steward cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."

"A bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."

"I do not know if there were additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"Smaller-sized organizations may not be able to invest in SAP Information Steward because of the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

SAP PowerDesigner vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 32% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 29% of the time

SAP Data Quality Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 22% of the time

Syniti Information Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 17% of the time

More SAP Information Steward Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

April 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Information Steward

March 2025

Download SAP Information Steward product report

Also Known As

No data available

Information Steward, SAP Data Insight

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

Ataccama

Monitor, analyze, and improve data integrity with SAP Information Steward software. Combine data profiling and metadata management tools for continuous insight into the quality of enterprise information to optimize processes, and enhance operational, analytical, and data governance initiatives.

SAP

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

American Water, Graphic Packaging International, OSRAM Licht AG, Maxim Integrated

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

April 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Information Steward report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.