Ataccama ONE Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (5th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (5th)

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Ranking in Data Governance

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 28.1%, down from 28.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Gazi Salauddin

Senior Associate at Cognizant

Robust data management and governance praised for its user-friendly interface and scalability, but potential drawbacks include the need for improvements in search functionality

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance. They extract rules, and create factor automation, ensuring streamlined governance, especially for similar classifieds. The process involves defined steps and adjustable parameters that seamlessly integrate into the worklist components. Daily operations and background runs are accommodated within the workflow, maximizing possibilities for Acronis use cases. Data profiling and masking, where understanding data details is crucial for security without compromising confidentiality. is well-utilized across different fronts, offering a user-friendly experience for making decisions on data storage, classification, and mapping. The front-end interface is particularly commendable, facilitating easy understanding, and the back-end process in Ataccama ensures the completion of classifier profiling and metadata tagging.

Read full review

Peter West

Managing Director at Pesaro IT

Data labeling gives visibility into where your confidential and critical data are

There are negatives to the compliance aspect of Purview in that you get a lot of false positives with some of the native scanning and rules in the platform. A lot of them need tweaking to get a more realistic handle on what data there is. Also, I wouldn't say that the remediation of policy violations is particularly great. It has improved, but it's not very easy to dig into things if there is a policy violation. A lot of them are false-positives. It has helped reduce the time to action on insider threats, but there are quite a lot of false positives there as well. Overall, it's a work in progress for Microsoft. I would also like to see pre-built reporting. The dashboard isn't really that intuitive. It would be good to have more intuitive dashboards that you can drill down into or even customizable dashboards.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"The reporting is excellent. Limiting what people can see is also valuable, especially when tagging documents."

"The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization."

"The cataloging tool is definitely the most valuable... It tells you about all the data you have in your tables, which helps people understand our data. We now know what data we have."

"Purview's ability to connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices is critical."

"You can set up automated dates to alert on internal data."

"The time to onboard is pretty short."

"Purview helped us automate and control our data without having to rely on people to manually tag documents with specific retention periods."

"Microsoft Purview is scalable."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"Data movement is a pain."

"There is room for improvement when it comes to Purview's data connector platform in supporting ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources."

"Setting up Purview in a production tenant proved challenging due to a lack of clear documentation on permission requirements."

"I rate Microsoft support six out of 10. The standard support is acceptable, but sometimes it doesn't respond fast enough. Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations."

"We have had a lot of issues since we moved to Unified Support. There have been work gaps there, and we believe they fixed them, but we need to make sure that they are going to be sustainable. It is to be seen."

"The support could be better, particularly with consulting."

"I try to avoid opening tickets with Microsoft due to long response times, which is frustrating."

"We've had a few issues with the scanner. It runs perfectly one day, and on another day, it will run the whole night. It's probably related to the rules. If I set some compliance rules and apply the rules to any column, I can't delete it. I have to disable it and reactivate it."

"If we could have a view something like we have in CrowdStrike—which is, I believe, the biggest competitor to Microsoft when it comes to security—a node nodal view, which we also have in Defender, that would make it a more complete, one-stop solution. That would save a lot of time for the admins and the engineers."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"The price is a little bit high, but it's worth the money because it has a lot of features."

"People often and unjustly say that Microsoft product pricing is not in the scope of reality, that it's just too expensive at times. I do not feel that is the case at all... If I'm able to let go of 30 to 70 percent of my IT administration staff, that makes up for a lot of money."

"Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is not cheap."

"We pay $15,000 per end user for the E5 license."

"It is cheap. It is based on consumption. If somebody wants to start using it, the price is definitely cheaper than a tool like Collibra."

"Aside from the complexity of the pricing model, the price itself is realistic. Features like AI components and automatic classification require additional licenses. Still, anyone can start using Purview with a basic E3 license if they're using Microsoft 365 and grow with additional licenses as needed. Overall, we're satisfied with the price."

"The interesting part is how they are bundling the version into the E5 stack. If it was not for that inclusion, this would have been a difficult conversation for us, so kudos to Microsoft on that. Separating it out may become a problem for customer retention. It is definitely a good move on Microsoft's part to include it as part of any existing or any system upgrades for customers that were on E3."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is cheap or free since we have an EFI license. It is free for the EFI user.

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

There is definitely room for improvement as this product is quite new. In terms of the competence of the tools with the Microsoft ecosystem, the product can do better.

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Comparisons

Compared 23% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 21% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 20% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 10% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Data Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Ataccama ONE Platform

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Learn More

Ataccama

Video not available

Microsoft

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Information Not Available

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance