Ataccama ONE Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Ataccama and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ataccama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Ataccama holds a 2.6% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 25.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 6 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

1,281 Views
865 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 56 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

19,357 Views
9,999 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ataccama ONE Platform and Microsoft Purview Data Governance compete in the data governance domain. Ataccama ONE Platform stands out for its robust integration and customer support, while Microsoft Purview Data Governance excels with a comprehensive feature set and value for price.

Features: Ataccama ONE Platform offers advanced data quality management, comprehensive data profiling, and seamless integration with other systems. It supports efficient data automation, enhancing data management processes. Microsoft Purview Data Governance provides strong integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, features extensive data cataloging capabilities, and includes advanced data lineage tracking. Its detailed classification rules and compliance tracking enhance governance across various environments.

Room for Improvement: Ataccama ONE Platform could refine its reporting features and documentation for better usability. Increasing customization options and expanding native integrations would also be advantageous. Microsoft Purview Data Governance may improve its customer support response times, simplify its initial setup process, and extend its usability beyond the Microsoft environment for broader appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ataccama ONE Platform is known for its straightforward deployment and effective customer support. Microsoft Purview Data Governance benefits from seamless integration with Microsoft's suite but may require more complex initial setup. While both offer robust customer services, Ataccama ONE Platform receives better feedback for support quality and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Ataccama ONE Platform is considered cost-effective, offering strong ROI with lower initial setup costs, making it suitable for organizations balancing cost and capabilities. Microsoft Purview Data Governance demands higher upfront investment, but perceptions of long-term ROI, especially for enterprises using Microsoft tools, often validate its expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (5th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (5th)

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Ranking in Data Governance

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 25.4%, up from 25.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

James McDowall

Senior Microsoft Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The sensitivity and retention options in Purview are excellent

Some of the menu headings may not be easy to understand for some people. For example, when I first used Purview, I noticed that one of the self-compliance centers had changed its name. Microsoft has done a huge amount of updates, and sometimes it's hard to keep track of what Purview can do. We almost constantly have to explore it. Maybe Microsoft could have a 365 roadmap where we can look at upcoming features, or some kind of bulletin announcement for Purview users that explains new features and what they can do in simple terms. We could also look at the menu settings. In my experience of using Purview, we've never used it as an exclusive system for IT professionals or technical staff. We were very keen that other specialists around the business made use of some of these features because we thought that some of what Purview could do was relevant to other departments as well as IT. For example, we have HR managers and financial staff who use it. I think that some of the terminology in Purview is pitched toward IT and tech professionals, and it may not be immediately understood by other specialists. This is something that could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"Data authentication enables us to classify documents based on whether they should be restricted for internal consumption or permitted for external sharing."

"Data segregation is the most valuable feature."

"It gives you the opportunity to know your data and apply policies around it. If those policies are flouted, you can always track what's happening. You have options such as alerting the person who is committing that action, or you can take automatic action by blocking, for example, an email that is been sent externally. It's very useful."

"The data protection feature is vital as it controls who can access data when it moves out of our protected boundary."

"It is very easy to learn the interface, and it is very user-friendly."

"Their data labeling or data classification is particularly valuable because we want to categorize all of our data into confidential, public, or internal."

"Purview helps mitigate risk and allows us to govern the information being shared among apps and devices."

"My favorite features are eDiscovery and insider risk management, because these are the major threats to an organization that can't be easily traced."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"Data movement is a pain."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers."

"Non-Microsoft use cases are not very high. It's limited for now."

"I lose a little bit of that control when we're talking about third-party connectors. Compliance-wise, I would like to see more ability to audit from a user perspective, where I could extrapolate what the user was thinking or trying to do."

"The API needs some improvement when connecting to non-Microsoft API sources. This is a limiting factor."

"Reflecting organizational changes within Purview is impractical."

"There is room for improvement when it comes to Purview's data connector platform in supporting ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources."

"We are currently in the rollout phase, so I am not entirely sure about specific areas of improvement. However, there are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded."

"The product needs improvement to edit the number of assets. It needs to be more inuitive as well."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side."

"Aside from the complexity of the pricing model, the price itself is realistic. Features like AI components and automatic classification require additional licenses. Still, anyone can start using Purview with a basic E3 license if they're using Microsoft 365 and grow with additional licenses as needed. Overall, we're satisfied with the price."

"To get the full features of Purview, we currently need E5 enterprise licenses, which are expensive."

"Microsoft Purview is the best option I have encountered when it comes to price. Maybe some of my information is outdated, but Microsoft offered it so that you could use it almost without paying."

"The pricing depends on the client's requirements and the number of applications."

"I would rate the cost of Microsoft Purview a six out of ten with ten being the most expensive."

"Price-wise, I think it's very generous and accessible to not just enterprises but small to medium-sized companies as well. I think it's very fair in terms of how they break apart the storage and the actual computing, and that makes it very accessible. So, that is a very big plus for Purview."

"Microsoft Purview is priced in the middle. It isn't the cheapest, but it isn't the most expensive. It's affordable compared to other public cloud services."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

The auto-tagging feature should be available at a lower licensing level.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

Auto-tagging should be available at lower levels of licensing. Right now, a high level of licensing is needed for auto-tagging, and this feature should be made available at a lower license level.

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 19% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 11% of the time

Collibra Lineage vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 10% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Data Hub vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

March 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

February 2025

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

Ataccama

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

January 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.