Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ataccama ONE Platform vs SAS Data Management comparison

Ataccama and SAS are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Ataccama is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAS is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.5. Ataccama holds a 7.6% mindshare in DQ, compared to SAS’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAS users who would recommend it.
Ataccama ONE Platform
Read 6 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews
  • 534 Views
  • 357 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SAS Data Management
Read 16 SAS Data Management reviews
  • 211 Views
  • 175 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAS Data Management and Ataccama ONE Platform are rivals in the data management sector. While SAS is favored for support and pricing, Ataccama ONE stands out due to its advanced feature set, garnering user preference despite higher costs.

Features: SAS Data Management is noted for its comprehensive data integration, quality control, and governance capabilities. Its ability to connect to any data source and offer robust reporting tools enhances its utility. Ataccama ONE Platform distinguishes itself with AI-driven data quality, an intuitive user interface, and seamless master data management, facilitating efficient workflow management.

Room for Improvement: SAS Data Management could benefit from enhanced AI functionalities and a less complex setup process. Its learning curve can be steep for non-technical users. Ataccama ONE Platform may improve by enhancing customer support and further streamlining data integration processes. Its cost-effectiveness could be addressed for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Data Management provides a comprehensive deployment framework backed by strong customer service. Its setup involves multiple steps, which might be complex for some users. Ataccama ONE Platform is noted for its user-friendly installation process, although its customer service does not match the level offered by SAS, a potential area for improvement.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Management is generally more cost-effective, appealing to a range of budgets with its affordable initial costs and solid ROI. Ataccama ONE Platform, while presenting a higher initial cost, provides satisfying ROI through its superior feature set, appealing to those ready to invest in cutting-edge functionalities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAS Data Management Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAS Data Management
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform
Ranking in Data Quality
5th
Ranking in Data Governance
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th)
SAS Data Management
Ranking in Data Quality
11th
Ranking in Data Governance
26th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (35th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 7.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 2.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments
We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.
Read full review
Vivek Trivedi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has robust data governance capabilities and efficient financial alerting features
The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards. Our dedicated data governance team is responsible for setting policies and monitoring data access and usage. Additionally, we have a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and an independent InfoSec team that work together to enforce these policies. This multi-layered approach ensures that data governance is effectively managed and compliant with all necessary regulations. It is integrated with SQL and Power BI servers for executive management dashboard reporting. This integration supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting needs, which was a key factor in our decision. The value of using vCenter lies in its comprehensive data infrastructure management. It significantly enhances our reporting, day-to-day decision-making, and analytics capabilities. Integrating SaaS with vCenter adds value by streamlining key functions and improving overall organizational efficiency. The solution can be considered expensive, particularly due to infrastructure, maintenance, and ownership costs. The long-term savings and efficiencies gained from using vCenter can justify the investment for large organizations. However, the high costs might not be justifiable for smaller organizations with less data and fewer resources. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis based on the organization's specific needs and scale is recommended. I rate it an eight.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."
"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."
"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."
"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."
"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."
"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."
"The product offers very good flexibility."
"I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize."
"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."
"If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick."
"The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards."
"The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes."
"The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful."
"The technical support is excellent."
More SAS Data Management pros
 

Cons

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."
"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."
"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."
"Data movement is a pain."
"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."
"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."
"We implemented it a while ago, and we are trying to improve the data delivery performance. We are looking into how to get faster and automated reporting. We would need better designs and workflows."
"I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations."
"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."
"The solution could use better documentation."
"The solution is quite expensive and hard to install/configure."
"We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive."
"Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement."
"With SAS Data Management, you have to purchase an external driver, configure all of the tables for all of the data that you will extract from Salesforce. It's not a straightforward process."
More SAS Data Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced."
"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."
"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."
"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."
"The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments."
"The tool is a bit expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Insurance Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?
The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?
The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?
Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...
See all answers
What do you like most about SAS Data Management?
I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?
The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments. This model ensures continuous updates and support while managing initial setup costs.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?
Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement. A more seamless integration process and transitioning to a cloud-based environment would enhance user-friendliness ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform
Compared 20% of the time
Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform
Compared 19% of the time
Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform Logo
Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform
Compared 19% of the time
Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform Logo
Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform Logo
Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform
Compared 8% of the time
More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management
Compared 20% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management Logo
Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management
Compared 17% of the time
Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management
Compared 14% of the time
Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management Logo
Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management
Compared 12% of the time
Talend Open Studio vs SAS Data Management Logo
Talend Open Studio vs SAS Data Management
Compared 10% of the time
More SAS Data Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Ataccama ONE Platform
April 2025
Ataccama ONE Platform reportDownload Ataccama ONE Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
SAS Data Management
March 2025
SAS Data Management reportDownload SAS Data Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux
 

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

Ataccama

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

SAS
 

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library
Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
Buyer's Guide
Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAS Data Management
April 2025
Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAS Data Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAS Data Management report.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors and best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.