Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AttackIQ vs Pentera comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
Pentera is scalable, adaptable, and well-rated, efficiently supporting diverse user numbers and operations with minimal team maintenance.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
Pentera excels in vulnerability assessment and protection, offering automated solutions for on-prem and cloud infrastructure with ease of use.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
3.9
Pentera needs improvements in graphic card support, dashboard specificity, licensing options, flexibility, and scalability for enhanced testing and monitoring.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.4
Pentera is highly praised for its stability, quickly resolving early bugs, making it a reliable network tool choice.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.5
Pentera's customer service is responsive and helpful, though expertise varies; technical support is highly rated despite some delays.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Pentera users view licensing costs variably, yet agree on its effectiveness and value in enhancing cybersecurity and ransomware protection.
 

Categories and Ranking

AttackIQ
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
8th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Pentera
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (12th), Penetration Testing Services (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of AttackIQ is 7.2%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pentera is 27.8%, up from 25.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

BN
Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up
I can't think of any features that are lacking just now. It does everything I need it to do. I don't have too much experience with the solution. I need more time to really study the solution to see if there are any shortcomings. The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time.
Richard Marlow - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good features and helps monitor the status of ransomware protection in an organization
The tool is quite scalable. There's a one-to-one relationship between the engine and how many scans we can do. We can only do one scan with one engine. We had some issues around the password assessments because we added a lot of users. It took a long time. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. We have three users in our organization.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Pentera?
What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach.
What needs improvement with Pentera?
One area for product improvement could be the inclusion of a dashboard to cover multiple branches and subsidiaries, allowing for centralized monitoring.
What is your primary use case for Pentera?
Our customers use the product to validate their security environment, ensuring that vulnerabilities within the network are identified and addressed.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: November 2024.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.