Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AttackIQ vs The NodeZero Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 11, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

AttackIQ
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
9th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
The NodeZero Platform
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
10th
Average Rating
1.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (40th), Penetration Testing Services (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of AttackIQ is 7.1%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of The NodeZero Platform is 5.4%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

BN
Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up
I can't think of any features that are lacking just now. It does everything I need it to do. I don't have too much experience with the solution. I need more time to really study the solution to see if there are any shortcomings. The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time.
reviewer2331969 - PeerSpot reviewer
Doesn’t identify threats and vulnerabilities, and the reports are quite useless
We run the penetration testing and look at the reports. The reports are quite useless. We are looking for a different product. The tool did not help enhance our organization's cybersecurity posture. The reports had a lot of false positives. They didn't detect anything. The tool didn’t identify any vulnerabilities. The solution must detect threats and vulnerabilities.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."
"Penetration testing and scans are useful features."
 

Cons

"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."
"The reports are quite useless."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Horizon3.ai?
Penetration testing and scans are useful features.
What needs improvement with Horizon3.ai?
We run the penetration testing and look at the reports. The reports are quite useless. We are looking for a different product. The tool did not help enhance our organization's cybersecurity posture...
What is your primary use case for Horizon3.ai?
The solution is used for penetration testing.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Horizon3.ai
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.