Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AuditBoard vs Bitsight comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
GRC (2nd)
Bitsight
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Attack Surface Management (ASM) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 4.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitsight is 11.4%, down from 16.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Vendor Risk Management
 

Featured Reviews

Gopichand Rajbhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 1, 2022
User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features
We have limited access, where we can do the risk assessment, check the evidence, and, if there are any deviations, we can put that remark in a comment. The reviewer will check that from their end.  In AuditBoard, companies have their own controls. According to ISO 27,001, in the risk assessment…
Alfredo Alvim - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 23, 2024
Provides comprehensive insights into security posture
Bitsight provides comprehensive insights into security posture, enabling us to effectively reduce risks. it increases the security of writing and reduces the risks We work directly on their website to define all the assets that we need to scan. We have some meetings with the manager. For example,…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."
"I find the most significant elements of this solution are the out-of-the-box reporting, the ease of workflow, workflow management, and the ease of managing our audit process."
"There are lots of features."
"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."
"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."
"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."
"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."
"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."
"I prefer BitSight due to its patch management capabilities. The score is a valuable feature. I have contacted the customer support through e-mail and their response rate is fast. I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The product helps us identify the vulnerabilities of internet-facing applications."
"Its customer service team responds quickly."
"Offers open ports from an external point of view."
"The solution is user-friendly."
 

Cons

"The layout for the end user could be improved."
"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."
"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."
"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."
"AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust."
"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."
"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."
"They should improve the solution's test sheets feature for ease of use."
"Data enrichment is the major issue."
"At the moment, when the vulnerability score decreases, it remains the same for quite a while, even though issues are resolved in 24 hours."
"Its factor analysis feature could be better."
"The solution’s benchmarking should be improved."
"There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."
"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."
"The product has a reasonable price."
"The solution's price is average."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
813,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Insurance Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?
It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AuditBoard?
I believe the license is based on the number of key controls that will be tested regularly. You can also pay extra for additional modules, like risk testing and operational audits, etc.
What needs improvement with AuditBoard?
The layout for the end user could be improved for the control owners and people from whom I request information. If you have a good knowledge of internal auditing, you know there are internal contr...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BitSight?
The product is a little expensive and very oriented to large companies.
What needs improvement with BitSight?
We face difficulties in acquiring designs and findings. There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side of BitSight.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Fannie Mae, Cabela's, BNP Paribas, PWC, AIR Worldwide, Con Edison, The Container Store, OshKosh, Steris, University of South Florida, Emblem Health, Lloyds Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. Bitsight and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
813,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.