Aurea CX Messenger vs PubSub+ Platform comparison

Aurea and Solace are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Aurea is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while Solace is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. Aurea holds a 0.5% mindshare in MQ, compared to Solace’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aurea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Solace users who would recommend it.

Aurea CX Messenger

Read 7 Aurea CX Messenger reviews

225 Views
77 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PubSub+ Platform

Read 16 PubSub+ Platform reviews

1,369 Views
1,060 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aurea CX Messenger

PubSub+ Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Aurea CX Messenger and PubSub+ Platform are competitors in the enterprise messaging space. PubSub+ Platform tends to be favored due to its advanced features that outweigh its cost compared to Aurea CX Messenger.

Features: Aurea CX Messenger provides stability with its centralized messaging infrastructure and supports various integration capabilities. PubSub+ Platform offers real-time event streaming, a cloud-native approach, and extensive support for microservices and IoT, with a wide array of compatible protocols for modern architecture needs.

Room for Improvement: Aurea CX Messenger could enhance its out-of-the-box features and advance its support for newer digital trends like IoT. PubSub+ Platform's complexity in deployment and integration processes can be challenging for users unfamiliar with its advanced features. Both products could improve ease of use and expand their documentation for wider developer accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aurea CX Messenger provides easy deployment and strong infrastructure management with effective support channels. PubSub+ Platform, though intricate in its deployment due to a broad feature set, offers substantial documentation and a responsive support network to assist in the implementation process.

Pricing and ROI: Aurea CX Messenger is priced competitively with a quick ROI, suitable for cost-conscious businesses. PubSub+ Platform, with its higher upfront costs, delivers greater long-term value through scalability and adaptability, essential for companies aiming for sustained development and growth.

To learn more, read our detailed Aurea CX Messenger vs. PubSub+ Platform Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aurea CX Messenger vs. PubSub+ Platform

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Messenger

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

9th

Ranking in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

7th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (12th), SOA Governance (3rd)

PubSub+ Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Ranking in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (9th), Streaming Analytics (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Messenger is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PubSub+ Platform is 5.3%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

Radhey Rajput

Sr. IT Analyst at NCR Corporation

Lightweight and efficient solution

It's very good and lightweight. But, it does not provide web service communication. But it is excellent for internal connections One valuable feature is the messaging broker. If there is a disruption, it restores the messages. And when the application is running, it delivers all the messages. The…

Read full review

BhanuChidigam

Sofware Engineering Manager at Wells Fargo

Performs well, high availability, and helpful support

We use approximately four people for the maintenance of the solution. My advice to others is this solution has high throughput and is used for many stock exchanges. For business critical use cases, such as processing financial transactions at a quick speed, I would recommend this solution. I rate PubSub+ Event Broker an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."

"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."

"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."

"The solution offers excellent stability."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."

"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."

"This solution reduces the latency to access changes in real-time and the effort required to onboard a new subscriber. It also reduces the maintenance of each of those interfaces because now the publisher and subscribers are decoupled. Event Broker handles all the communication and engagement. We can just push one update, then we don't have to know who is consuming it and what's happening to that publication downstream. It's all done by the broker, which is a huge benefit of using Event Broker."

"Going from something where we had outages and capacity issues constantly to a system that was able to scale with the massive market data and messaging spikes that happened during the initial stages of the COVID crisis in March, we were able to scale with 40 plus percent growth in our platform over the course of days."

"When it comes to granularity, you can literally do anything regarding how the filtering works."

"The topic hierarchy is pretty flexible. Once you have the subject defined just about anybody who knows Java can come onboard. The APIs are all there."

"We've built a lot of products into it and it's been quite easy to feed market data onto the systems and put entitlements and controls around that. That was a big win for us when we were consolidating our platforms down. Trying to have one event bus, one messaging bus, for the whole globe, and consolidate everything over time, has been key for us. We've been able to do that through one API, even if it's across the different languages."

"The most useful features has been the WAN optimization and probably the HybridEdge, which requires some third-party adapters or plugins. The idea that we can position Solace as a protocol-agnostic message transport fabric is key to our company having all manners of asynchronous messaging protocols from MQ, Kafka, JMS, etc. I really like the WAN optimization: Send once over a WAN, then distribute locally as many times as there are subscribers."

"The event portal and the diversity of deployment options in a hybrid landscape are the most valuable features."

"As of now, the most valuable aspects are the topic-based subscription and the fanout exchange that we are using."

More PubSub+ Platform pros

Cons

"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."

"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."

"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."

"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."

"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"

"We have requested to be able to get into the payload to do dynamic topic hierarchy building. A current workaround is using the message's header, where the business data can be put into this header and be used for a dynamic topic lookup. I want to see this in action when there are a couple of hundred cases live. E.g., how does it perform? From an administration perspective, is the ease of use there?"

"The section on observability pertains to understanding the functioning of an event crash. Instead of focusing on how the crash occurs, attention is given to the observable aspects, such as a memory pipeline where one person pushes messages and another reads them. However, this pipeline often encounters issues, such as the reader being unavailable, causing the system to become stuck and preventing the messages from moving forward. This can lead to the pipeline being permanently stalled."

"If you create one event in the past, you cannot resend it."

"The solution could be improved by enhancing the message pooling size for persistent messages to handle both small and large messages effectively."

"The ease of management could be approved. The GUI is very good, but to configure and manage these devices programmatically in the software version is not easy. For example, if I would like to spin up a new software broker, then I could in theory use the API, but it would require a considerable amount of development effort to do so. There should be a tool, or something that Solace supports, that we could use for this, e.g., a platform like Terraform where we could use infrastructure as code to configure our source appliances."

"For improvements, I would suggest increasing the max payload size to a limit of 100MB or more. The current max payload size is limited to 5MB."

"One of the areas of improvement would be if we could tell the story a bit better about what an event mesh does or why an event mesh is foundational to a large enterprise that has a wide diversity of applications that are homegrown and a small number off the shelf."

"It could be cheaper. It could also have easier usage. It is a brilliant product, but it is quite complex to use."

More PubSub+ Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is not so high."

"You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"

"Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."

"Having a free version is critical for our technology operations use case. This is primarily because our technology operations team is a cost center in our company. They are not profit drivers and having a free version for installation will probably meet our needs. Even for production, it'll support up to a 100,000 messages per second. I don't think in technology operations that we have that many events and alerts from our detection tools. Even if I have 20 or 30 event detection products out there, they're only going to publish the things which are critical or warnings. I don't think we'll ever reach a 100,000 messages per second."

"I would rate the product's pricing a ten out of ten."

"There are different tiers where you can choose what would work for you. As a customer, you need to know roughly how many messages a month you will use."

"Having a free version of the solution was a big, important part of our decision to go with it. This was the big driver for us to evaluate Solace. We started using it as the free version. When we felt comfortable with the free version, that is when we bought the enterprise version."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"The pricing and licensing were very transparent and well-communicated by our account manager."

"We have been really happy with the product licensing rates. It has been free for us, up to a 100,000 transactions per second, and all we have to do is pay for support. Making their product available and accessible to us has not been a problem at all."

"The licensing is dependent on the volume that is flowing. If you go for their support services, it will cost some more money, but I think it is worth it, especially if you are just starting your journey."

More PubSub+ Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

36%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aurea CX Messenger?

The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aurea CX Messenger?

The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aurea CX Messenger?

The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the fut...

See all answers

What do you like most about PubSub+ Event Broker?

The most valuable feature of PubSub+ Event Broker is the scaling integration. Prior to using the solution, it was done manually with a file, and it can be done instantly live.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PubSub+ Event Broker?

The price of the solution is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PubSub+ Event Broker?

The solution could be improved by enhancing the message pooling size for persistent messages to handle both small and large messages effectively. Additionally, providing a comprehensive dashboard t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 58% of the time

TIBCO eFTL vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 42% of the time

More Aurea CX Messenger Competitors

Apache Kafka vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 29% of the time

IBM MQ vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 23% of the time

ActiveMQ vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Confluent vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon SQS vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More PubSub+ Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Activity Monitoring

January 2025

Download Aurea CX Messenger product report

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform

January 2025

Download PubSub+ Platform product report

Also Known As

CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ

PubSub+ Event Broker, PubSub+ Event Portal

Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Aurea

PubSub+ Platform supports real-time shipment tracking, IT event management in multiclouds, and connects legacy and cloud-native systems for application modernization. It's utilized for trading, streaming market data, and app-to-app messaging, enhancing event-driven architectures with reliable message queuing.

Organizations adopt PubSub+ to efficiently transport events across hybrid and cloud environments, managing audit trails and long processing tasks. The platform aids integration through dynamic data publication, event mesh capabilities, and WAN optimization. Features like seamless integration, protocol agnosticism, and flexible topic hierarchy enhance versatility. Solace Admin Utility simplifies configuration and management, while the event portal allows hybrid deployment.

What are the key features of PubSub+ Platform?

Dynamic Data Publication: Enables flexible and responsive data handling.
Event Mesh Capabilities: Facilitates efficient event transportation.
WAN Optimization: Enhances data transfer across networks.
Protocol Agnosticism: Supports a wide range of protocols for integration.
Flexible Topic Hierarchy: Allows detailed and organized data exchange.
Solace Admin Utility: Provides intuitive configuration and management.
Granular Topic Filtering: Offers precise data filtering options.
Guaranteed Messaging: Ensures reliable message delivery.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Seamless Integration: Reduces complexity in connecting systems.
Performance and Scaling: Supports high-load environments efficiently.
Asynchronous Messaging: Improves application performance.
Robust Support System: Provides guidance and problem resolution.

PubSub+ is implemented in industries requiring real-time data handling and integration between disparate systems. Financial institutions use it for trading and streaming market data, while logistics companies benefit from real-time shipment tracking. Enterprises apply it to modernize operations by connecting legacy systems with cloud-native applications, enhancing their architecture and ensuring data reliability across environments.

Solace

Sample Customers

Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage

FxPro, TP ICAP, Barclays, Airtel, American Express, Cobalt, Legal & General, LSE Group, Akuna Capital, Azure Information Technology, Brand.net, Canadian Securities Exchange, Core Transport Technologies, Crédit Agricole, Fluent Trade Technologies, Harris Corporation, Korea Exchange, Live E!, Mercuria Energy, Myspace, NYSE Technologies, Pico, RBC Capital Markets, Standard Chartered Bank, Unibet

Buyer's Guide

Aurea CX Messenger vs. PubSub+ Platform

January 2025

Free Report: Aurea CX Messenger vs. PubSub+ Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs. PubSub+ Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aurea CX Messenger vs. PubSub+ Platform report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors and best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.