Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aurea CX Messenger vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Messenger
Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software
9th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Business Activity Monitoring (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (12th), SOA Governance (3rd), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (7th)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Database Development and Management (7th), Relational Databases Tools (9th), Data Warehouse (7th)
 

Featured Reviews

Radhey Rajput - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 2, 2023
Lightweight and efficient solution
It's very good and lightweight. But, it does not provide web service communication. But it is excellent for internal connections One valuable feature is the messaging broker. If there is a disruption, it restores the messages. And when the application is running, it delivers all the messages. The…
AF
Jun 21, 2023
Uses a memory desk processor very efficiently and performs well while maintaining a low cost
The solution is a fine product. However, to make it perfect, in some cases, there might be a need to traverse the queue. RabbitMQ currently lacks the capability for archiving the queue, which essentially turns it into a log. For such requirements, you may need to explore other options like Kafka or custom drivers that allow traversing the entire queue. In RabbitMQ, while you can traverse the entire queue, you need to devise a workaround to handle the messages. For example, you can read a message from one queue, publish it to another queue or keep it in some other way to retain the desired entries, and then stop at that point. Additionally, the need for support may vary depending on the usage and potential heavy loads on the system. The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness. I don't encounter significant challenges or areas that require improvement while using the solution. Everything works smoothly, and I find it well thought out. It's got excellent compliance with MQP 9.0. Overall, I have had a positive experience with the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"The security is great."
"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."
"The solution improved our site reliability."
"The product's reliability is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"Very fast for query processing."
"The solution can scale."
"Tanzu Greenplum's most valuable features include the integration of modern data science approaches across an MPP platform."
 

Cons

"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"If messages pile up until the space of the memory is full, then basically, the cluster goes down, and someone has to log in through the backend and purge all messages."
"The product is pretty hard to configure."
"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."
"They should add more analytics. Their documentation could also be improved so that I don't have to bother my co-workers and tech support so often."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"Extra filters would be helpful."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
"You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
"The pricing is not so high."
"The price is pretty good."
"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."
"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."
"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."
"This is an open source solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Insurance Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aurea CX Messenger?
The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aurea CX Messenger?
The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.
What needs improvement with Aurea CX Messenger?
The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the fut...
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
 

Also Known As

CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.