AutoSys Workload Automation vs Jitterbit Harmony comparison

Broadcom and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8, while Jitterbit is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 12.8% mindshare in WA, compared to Jitterbit’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 81 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,793 Views
4,876 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Harmony

Read 13 Jitterbit Harmony reviews

86 Views
66 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

Jitterbit Harmony

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Jitterbit Harmony and AutoSys Workload Automation are competitive products in the automation and integration category. Jitterbit Harmony is preferred for its flexibility and ease of integration, whereas AutoSys is favored for its extensive scheduling and workload automation features.

Features: Jitterbit Harmony offers real-time processing, cloud connectivity, and an intuitive user interface conducive to setting up integrations rapidly. AutoSys Workload Automation provides strong scheduling abilities, complex job dependency management, and robust monitoring capabilities, making it ideal for large-scale operations.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Harmony could enhance its complex scheduling features, workforce integration tools, and advanced monitoring capabilities. AutoSys Workload Automation could improve with a more user-friendly interface, quicker deployment options, and simplified training procedures for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AutoSys Workload Automation has a more complex setup, often requiring dedicated training, but offers extensive resources and support. Jitterbit Harmony allows smoother deployment with its user-friendly interface, benefiting businesses that require quick implementation and efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Harmony is perceived as cost-effective with a quicker ROI, suiting small to mid-sized businesses with lower initial setup costs. AutoSys Workload Automation may have higher upfront costs but offers high long-term value for enterprises due to its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jitterbit Harmony

Ranking in Workload Automation

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (32nd), Cloud Data Integration (18th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 12.8%, down from 18.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Harmony is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Mohamed Abd Kader

Head of Enterprise Architecture at Mantrac Group

An easy-to-setup solution with good stability

We use Jitterbit to connect cloud solutions with our on-premises ERP system We connect cloud solutions to our on-premise ERP system easily using Jitterbit. It is its most valuable feature. The solution's API management capabilities need improvement. We have been using the solution for almost…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good."

"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is batch processing."

"Autosys is one of the oldest products in the market, and it has been around for quite a long time, close to 20 to 25 years."

"Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."

"We use technical support all the time. We would be lost without them. They're fantastic. Really good job. We're able to reach the right person to help us out right away."

"The capabilities of the product to schedule on multiple platforms, multiple operating systems."

"The CA workload agent has gotten much better. For our organization it's important for us to communicate in a secure fashion between the host and the other platforms, and we are able to do that with our CA product"

"AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."

"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."

"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."

"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."

"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."

"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."

"Easy integration with Salesforce"

"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."

More Jitterbit Harmony pros

Cons

"The graphical interface can be improved."

"Ease of implementation for upgrades."

"It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms."

"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."

"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve in the Linux environment. The previous versions of the AutoSys Workload Automation let you take the profile of the user that you were using to run the tasks that you're going to automate, but in the latest versions, you can't do that, you need to make more definitions and it's a little bit difficult. It was easier in the previous versions."

"The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement."

"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."

"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."

"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."

"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."

"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."

"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."

"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."

"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."

"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."

More Jitterbit Harmony cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

"It is overpriced."

"We paid to use the solution monthly."

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."

"Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."

"The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."

"The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"

"The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."

"Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

48%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

The solution is costly. The pricing is based on the number of users, which for me, translates to approximately $120,000 to $130,000 for a license period of two to three years.

See all answers

What do you like most about Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 35% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

SnapLogic vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 22% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 19% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 17% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 16% of the time

More Jitterbit Harmony Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

April 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2025

Download Jitterbit Harmony product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony

Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Organizations leverage AutoSys Workload Automation for running extensive workloads day and night, particularly important for banks, insurance clients, and enterprises needing robust job scheduling and file transfer processes. It is crucial for managing cross-functional dependencies with 24/7 automated triggers, batch processing, and centralized business process control, ensuring seamless operations across various servers and environments.

What are the most important features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and updates.
SAP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP environments.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires less frequent updates and interventions.
Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing business needs.
Speed and Stability: Ensures high performance and reliable operations.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances user experience and efficiency.
Real-time Batch Processing View: Provides instant insights into batch jobs.
Compatibility: Works well with various software systems.
Robustness: Delivers consistent, reliable performance.
Easy Setup: Simplifies deployment process.
File Transfer Protocol: Facilitates smooth and secure file transfers.
File Watcher: Monitors and manages file changes effectively.
Performance and Upgrades: Ensures improved performance and simplified upgrades.

What are the benefits or ROI items to consider?

Improved Efficiencies: Reduces manual intervention and automates repetitive tasks.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Enhanced Reliability: Decreases downtime with robust performance.
Better Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems.
24/7 Operations: Ensures uninterrupted business processes.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs.
Advanced Scheduling: Provides comprehensive job scheduling options.

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely implemented in banking for day and night operations, insurance client environments for reliable support, and enterprises for automated file transfers and robust job scheduling. Organizations centralize business processes and manage cross-functional dependencies effectively with its 24/7 automated triggers, supporting diverse industry needs through scalable and reliable performance.

Broadcom

Jitterbit Harmony is a comprehensive platform for data integration and API management, enabling seamless synchronization and automation across cloud-based and on-premises applications.

Users leverage Jitterbit Harmony to integrate systems like ERP and CRM applications, simplifying complex data workflows and enhancing automation. It supports efficient data migration and ensures smooth connectivity, handling diverse integration needs and helping streamline business processes. Users emphasize its drag-and-drop functionality and extensive templates, which contribute to its robust performance. However, improvements are needed in data mapping, error message clarity, and documentation, especially when dealing with large data volumes.

What are the key features of Jitterbit Harmony?

Easy Integration: Facilitates connecting various applications effortlessly.
Powerful Data Transformation: Offers tools for complex data workflows.
Seamless Connectivity: Supports efficient data migration between cloud and on-premises applications.
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: User-friendly interface for streamlined operations.
Extensive Pre-Built Templates: Provides numerous templates for quicker deployment.
Robust Performance: Ensures reliable operation even with complex tasks.
Flexible Data Format Handling: Manages different data types and formats efficiently.
Efficient API Management: Simplifies and maintains API requests and integrations.

What benefits should users look at when evaluating Jitterbit Harmony?

Scalability: Can grow with your business needs, handling more extensive operations seamlessly.
Automation: Improves business process automation, saving time and resources.
Data Synchronization: Ensures real-time data accuracy and flow between systems.
Support: Provides strong customer support to address integration challenges.

Companies across retail, manufacturing, healthcare, and finance sectors use Jitterbit Harmony to integrate critical applications and automate workflows. In retail, it connects inventory systems with sales platforms, reducing manual effort. Manufacturers sync their ERP systems with supply chain software, optimizing operations. Healthcare organizations integrate patient management systems with insurance databases, streamlining patient care. Financial institutions use it to connect accounting software with banking systems, ensuring real-time financial data exchange.

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony

March 2025

Free Report: AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony

Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.