AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Druva inSync comparison

"The SaaS feature of AvePoint Cloud Backup is very strong."

"It is a very good and stable solution...With AvePoint's support, our experience has been exceptional"

"I rate the overall solution a 9 out of 10."

"The most promising feature of the product is data security policies, which make it simpler to include compliance processes."

"The most valuable features are the email backup and the SharePoint backup."

"The initial setup is super easy."

"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."

"The backup and recovery functionalities of the product are very useful."

"All the data is well encrypted. In addition, the data is split into pieces so that if an endpoint is attacked or compromised with any kind of ransomware, the compromised machine can be relocated or restored. All the data that was previously backed up can be restored from the cloud. It has a lot of security features. Druva currently offers only the cloud version on AWS. Being a cloud solution, Druva goes by a lot of security compliances and provides a security portfolio. People are very skeptical of the data security in cloud solutions, and Druva has given consideration to that. It has some good geo-location features. If a machine is lost, when the machine is switched on and connected to the internet, that machine can be geo-located and tracked. It also has got the geo-wipeout feature. If someone tries to take out the data from a lost machine, they won't be able to do that. The moment an IT admin comes to know that the machine is no longer with a user, he or she can auto-run the geo-wipeout feature so that the data cannot be read by any third party. Duality replication is a unique thing about this solution. Everybody's data is not backed up if the data is common. Similar data is not backed up from other machines. The data backup also happens very smoothly. The bandwidth choking is very less. When the data is getting backed up, the users do not even get to know. There is no impact even when the users are not using high-speed bandwidth."

"The recovery aspect of the solution is its most valuable feature."

"It is simple to implement and use. It's very flexible."

"Druva is offered as a service so that we can access it from any enterprise-based browser or URL. We also have a single sign-on, which allows me to log in securely. Hence, I can easily access the system, configure it, perform day-to-day monitoring tasks, and check for any issues or configurations needed. Overall, it's a simple and easy-to-use tool with a high-speed and straightforward interface for management."

"Druva inSync's automation has reduced manual intervention in my data management processes."

"Users do not need to contact IT administrators to recover lost or deleted files. They can do it on their own, eliminating waiting time."

"One of the most valuable features is it is available on the cloud, so I do not need to make a firewall. Second, the backup speed is outstanding. The third thing is that the section policy is very good and gives you a lot of flexibility and granularity regarding what you need to back up."

"Our customers do not need to purchase third party storage or a separate server for data backup."

"Some customers choose other backup solutions because AvePoint is Office 365 and CRM backup system, but they have other backup needs for Azure and so on. Such customers often choose another backup solution instead of AvePoint."

"The configuration could be made easier."

"It would be beneficial to have a more optimal Google Backup for larger environments."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"AvePoint Cloud Backup's pricing could be lower and more flexible. Particularly, when dealing with smaller customers or more minor businesses, obtaining competitive pricing for bundles rather than on a one-by-one basis remains challenging."

"It is not a traditional restore process and it is somewhat limited in what we can do."

"I would like to see improvements in the tool's initial seed. The initial seed of around 10 TB of SharePoint data took 45 days to complete."

"For improvement, AvePoint can provide details on how the tool's backup scope works."

"The support of other cloud services needs to be improved. It has very good cloud support for AWS but not with others."

"The product needs to improve its support."

"The speed could be better."

"It would be good if bare metal backups were possible."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"I would like to see security improved in the next release."

"The one area that needs to improve is the pricing."

"To make Druva inSync better, they can implement additional DLP."

"It costs a little bit more than other competitors in the market."

"I am not sure, but I believe that the cost is $7 USD per user."

"I would say that the pricing policy of the product is flexible and good."

"I rate the product's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"It is very good for many of my customers in the banking and finance segments. The price isn't a problem there, but in some other industries, people ask for a cheaper solution. When the price is an issue for the customer, we recommend Veeam, Metallic."

"The platform is more expensive than other vendors."

"The pricing part of the solution is based on a subscription model, which is based on the number of users or storage capacity."

"Out of all the solutions we evaluated, Druva inSync was the most affordable."

"The product is fairly priced, I would rate its pricing five out of ten."

"It is an expensive product for the middle class or SMB customers in India. A lot of top-level big companies also cannot afford this solution. During the license period, one can download the entire data from the cloud without paying any additional cost. This way the data can be easily recreated from the stored data when a machine is lost or the data is compromised."

"The pricing is thirty-five dollars per year or three dollars per month per user."

"The pricing is good."

"It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"The price is quite good, It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive."