AWS CodeBuild vs Jenkins comparison

Read 93 Jenkins reviews

4,156 Views
3,557 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and AWS CodeBuild are prominent players in the CI/CD space. While Jenkins offers extensive customization and flexibility through its open-source nature, AWS CodeBuild gains an edge with seamless AWS service integration and effortless scalability.

Features: Jenkins provides a robust ecosystem with extensive plugin support, including Jenkins Pipelines, which allows for high pipeline customization, and programmable pipelines for process automation. AWS CodeBuild offers native integration with AWS services, serverless architecture that enhances elasticity and reliability, and seamless integration with third-party tools such as GitHub, facilitating ease of use within AWS environments.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins could enhance its installation process across different platforms, address plugin management issues, and update its interface for a better user experience. AWS CodeBuild may improve by strengthening integration with external storage solutions, enhancing loop functionality within scripts, and developing a more intuitive user interface along with improved build notification features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployments, but lacks formal customer service, relying on community support. AWS CodeBuild focuses on managed public cloud deployment, reducing infrastructure concerns for AWS users and offering AWS support that minimizes the need for community reliance.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins is an open-source tool with no license fees, making it highly cost-effective for organizations seeking community support. AWS CodeBuild's pay-as-you-go pricing based on compute resources provides financial flexibility, though it may be more expensive than Jenkins. Jenkins could lead to substantial cost savings in large deployments, while AWS CodeBuild offers competitive pricing and reasonable ROI, especially for projects already integrated into AWS.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: April 2025).

AWS CodeBuild vs. Jenkins

Download the complete report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 10.4%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price

The product must provide more integrations. It is a replica of Jenkins. We have a management overhead. When I build artifacts stored outside the S3 bucket, it will have additional charges on the storage volumes. If we use S3 buckets regularly, it is fine. However, when we store somewhere else, it will be an issue. There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds. We must fix the dependencies every time, even if the dependencies are the same. It is unnecessary.

Read full review

Dinesh-Patil

Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment

The dashboard needs to be improved. Though the access management and authentication functionalities are present, the dashboard and UI could be more user-friendly. The product has many plug-ins. Users have to go through the documentation to be able to use the product. The UI must be more user-friendly. The information should be available in the dashboard itself. The users shouldn’t have to refer to the documentation. When a user hovers over the elements on the dashboard, it should reveal information about them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."

"The integration is a good feature."

"The most important thing is that it's self-contained in an AWS account, and it's all linked to the customer's AWS account."

"A valuable feature is the support for third-party repositories such as Bitbucket, GitLab, or GitHub."

"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding."

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"The initial setup of CodeBuild is easy."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"Jenkins is a CI/CD tool and is the most robust tool."

"A lot of support material exists via a single web search of exactly what you're looking for."

"The most valuable features of Jenkins are the integration of automatic scripts for testing and the user's ability to use any script."

"The solution is scalable and concurrent users have access to the platform."

"The most valuable features of Jenkins are the ease of use and the information about how to use the features is readily available on the internet. Additionally, with the solution, I can use other reporting tools, such as Flow."

"The solution is scalable and has a large number of plugins that can help you scale it to your needs."

"It is very useful for us to be able to collect and manage automatic processing pipelines."

"Jenkins's automation and orchestration features have significantly improved workflows by automating various processes. Initially, it did not support YAML manifesting or GitOps, but recent versions have introduced these capabilities. Now, the tool supports importing manifest files from Git repositories, enabling the implementation of GitOps pipelines. Compared to other tools like GitLab, it has become a mature tool for running CI/CD pipelines."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."

"The front-end interface and the management are somewhat challenging, and there's a lot of space for improvement."

"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"For improvement, I'd suggest more build instance-type options. There's a big jump from 15 gigabytes of RAM to 150, and I'd like something in between as the larger option is too expensive for our needs."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"There have been times when CodeBuild has shown some instability, like bugs or breakdowns."

"Notifications could be added, or SNS integration could be included so that notifications can be received on every build, whether the build fails or succeeds."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"Logging could be improved to offer a clearer view."

"Jenkins needs a faster deployment process."

"Jenkins is not an easy solution to use and the configuration is not simple. They can improve the solution by adding a graphical interface that is more user-friendly."

"It would be better if there were an option to remove its Java dependency. This would make it more compatible with other software, and it could be much better. At present, we have to depend on Java whenever we want to deploy agents."

"Jenkins could improve by allowing more scripting languages. We need to use Groovy scripting and it is difficult to debug and it is not ideal for creating file scripts. We tried to search for assistance but we did not find much help."

"We sometimes face challenges during version upgrades, such as failures when migrating Kubernetes versions."

"I sometimes face a bottleneck when installing the plugins on an offline machine. Mapping the dependencies and then installing the correct sequence of dependencies is a nightmare, and it took me two days to do it."

"The solution's UI can use a facelift and the logs can use more detailed information."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"The solution is one of the lowest costs compared to competitors."

"It is a cheap solution."

"The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version."

"It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market. We are paying yearly."

"I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."

"Jenkins is open source and free."

"Jenkins is open source."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There is not a license required to use the solution because it is open-source."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Media Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeBuild?

It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

Regarding pricing, AWS services are quite expensive compared to open source tools like Git that are available for free.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better.

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Comparisons

Compared 43% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 19% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 15% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

CircleCI vs Jenkins

Compared 2% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeBuild

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Download Jenkins product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

AWS CodeBuild vs. Jenkins