Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Cost Management [EOL] vs Azure Cost Management comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Additionally, 83% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Azure Cost Management
Read 45 Azure Cost Management reviews
  • 1,279 Views
  • 998 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between AWS Cost Management [EOL] and Azure Cost Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Cost Management
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Cost Management [EOL]
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Azure Cost Management
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Cost Management (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

RANJAN KUMAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to set cost thresholds and receive alerts if the actual cost exceeds them
We regularly check the status of services to identify any unnecessary or unexpected costs. We utilize the billing dashboard in AWS to monitor daily costs and assess any significant increases. For instance, if our daily AWS expenses usually amount to $1,000 for running a hundred instances, and suddenly it spikes to $1,500, we investigate the reasons behind the increase. We scrutinize detailed reports, identify the areas and services contributing to the rise, and inform our manager. The dashboard overview in AWS Cost Explorer provides a high-level summary of our expenses, covering databases. This includes total costs, daily costs, and a breakdown by services. AWS Cost Explorer offers visualization tools like line charts, bar charts, and pie charts. These visualizations assist us in quickly understanding expenditures, enabling us to pinpoint areas that might need attention. The tool allows the creation of custom reports by selecting and configuring filtering and grouping options. Custom reports include a data range selector, making it easy to analyze expenses for specific periods such as daily, monthly, or custom durations. The budget feature is client-dependent. Before creating any services, we engage with our client to understand their requirements, such as the number of instances, CPU, and memory needed. Subsequently, we create a budgeting tool in servers based on these specifications. Our team configures custom notifications to alert us when actual costs or usage exceed predefined thresholds. These alerts can be sent via email or integrated with Simple Notification Service. I rate the overall product a ten out of ten.
Read full review
Joy Maitra - PeerSpot reviewer
Continuous monitoring and predictive analytics help provide insights into utilization
Continuous monitoring helps me detect anomalies in the pipeline, preplan resource scalability, and assist with cost management by offering good visibility into resource utilization. It also offers predictive analytics and some existing features, including dashboards. The AI prediction feature helps forecast based on current utilization trends and suggests improvements like the GenAI feature for interactive inquiries.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The budgeting tool of AWS Cost Management is the most valuable feature."
"All of the reporting features are very good, as they allow us to track monthly expenses and send relevant emails."
"I like the recommendation we get from AWS Cost Management to use a particular image or VM type."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It's not complex at all."
"With the cost management tool, clients can optimize fine tuning their consumption."
"AWS Cost Management is good for providing in-depth information in one place."
"The product provides the ability to set cost limits and budgets for a set of resources on the network."
"The initial setup wasn't complex at all."
More AWS Cost Management [EOL] pros
"The most valuable feature of Azure Cost Management is its way of segregating accounts based on resources."
"Gives visibility into the cost of cloud-based solutions."
"Billing management is self-explanatory. There isn't a specific feature that stands out, but it's a fundamental aspect that needs to be present."
"The most valuable features of Azure Cost Management are the ability to set standards or tagging policies and initiatives. You can achieve higher cost optimization."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Cost Management is cost optimization."
"We use Azure DevOps, and the product helps us understand the cost with the help of the Azure DevOps center."
"I like the granularity of the tools."
"We find the analytics available via this solution to be very useful, as it allows us to easily see detailed cost information for each of our various subscription elements."
More Azure Cost Management pros
 

Cons

"AWS Cost Management has fewer features compared to Azure Cost Management."
"This program is not very scalable."
"Data transfer between S3 buckets within AWS incurs costs, especially when moving data from one bucket to another or downloading data."
"The solution needs to improve the communication mechanism available to the stakeholders."
"I would like to see AWS Cost Management be more precise in their calculations."
"The solution needs to have its own dashboard for seeing details on it. It should be customizable as well so I have the ability to pull up the information I need to see and have it in one place for my reference. I should just be able to click and see everything I need in one step."
"There could be an option to build custom dashboards for the platform."
"We need finer-grained control over the roles and policies for users, specifying their permissions as to what they can look at."
More AWS Cost Management [EOL] cons
"Optimization and scalability could be increased."
"The response time of customer support can be improved."
"We have encountered delays in support."
"The product's foecasting needs improvement."
"The technical support could be improved."
"The tool's pricing should be made cheaper."
"The UI is complex, and it should be less so."
"I would like the developers to add more features about migration, like how much it would cost to migrate from, let's say, AWS to Azure."
More Azure Cost Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Cost Management is free to use."
"We have signed a long-term contract with AWS. There are different service levels that will determine the level of support you have."
"The tool's pricing depends on our services."
"We get AWS Cost Management for free because we use AWS services."
"The product is affordable."
"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive either."
"The subscription fees are primarily tailored to larger enterprises, potentially leaving smaller and medium-sized customers with limited options."
"Pricing isn't applicable as it's included with the subscription. It depends on the services used. If you acquire any services on Azure, you pay for the subscription, and the billing or cost management is included for free."
"Based on the transitional cost we charge, it's not expensive, but could be better."
"I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."
"Customers do not need to pay for the product's license, and the product is free of cost."
"You are charged based on how much you use the solution."
"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten - the price could be lower."
More Azure Cost Management pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise31
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Cost Management?
The tool's cost management feature provides a comprehensive view of AWS costs, allowing us to plan and make cost-effective decisions. With AWS Cost Explorer, we can perform cost planning, generate ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Cost Management?
The tool's pricing depends on our services.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Cost Management?
Data transfer between S3 buckets within AWS incurs costs, especially when moving data from one bucket to another or downloading data.
See all answers
What do you like most about Azure Cost Management?
Gives visibility into the cost of cloud-based solutions.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Cost Management?
The pricing part could be improved. I would rate it as six out of ten. It depends on the solution. We mostly pay for our licenses.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Cost Management?
Customization features could be added for Azure Cost Management ( /products/azure-cost-management-reviews ), but the dashboards are handy, and overall, everything is good.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
IBM Turbonomic vs Azure Cost Management Logo
IBM Turbonomic vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 33% of the time
Cloudability vs Azure Cost Management Logo
Cloudability vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 22% of the time
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Azure Cost Management Logo
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 14% of the time
Zabbix vs Azure Cost Management Logo
Zabbix vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 7% of the time
AWS Cost Explorer vs Azure Cost Management Logo
AWS Cost Explorer vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 7% of the time
More Azure Cost Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
AWS Cost Management [EOL]
September 2025
AWS Cost Management [EOL] reportDownload AWS Cost Management [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Azure Cost Management
September 2025
Azure Cost Management reportDownload Azure Cost Management product report
 

Also Known As

Amazon Cost Management
Microsoft Azure Cost Management, Cloudyn
 

Overview

AWS Cost Management tools give you visibility into your AWS costs and usage. There are a range of AWS Cost Management tools to help you access, organize, understand, control, and optimize your costs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Cost Management provides actionable insights for IT professionals to optimize cloud expenses and align budgets with strategic goals. It features real-time visibility and analytics for efficient resource management.

Azure Cost Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools for cost analysis and control, including budgeting alerts and integration capabilities to optimize resource spending. Its intuitive interface simplifies navigation while providing trend analysis, forecasting, and cost-saving recommendations. By delivering detailed insights into resource usage, Azure helps organizations manage expenses effectively, enabling strategic financial planning through clear visualizations and reports.

What are the key features of Azure Cost Management?
  • Customizable Cost Analysis: Tailored insights to analyze expenses effectively.
  • Real-Time Consumption Visibility: Immediate data access for informed decision-making.
  • Budgeting Alerts: Set alerts to monitor and control spending.
  • Advisor Recommendations: Integrated advice for cost optimization.
  • Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with various platforms.
  • Trend Analysis and Forecasting: Tools to predict future costs and trends.
What benefits should be expected when using Azure Cost Management?
  • Expense Optimization: Streamlined processes for managing cloud costs.
  • Enhanced Budget Management: Precise control over budget allocations.
  • Improved Financial Insights: Clear reporting for better financial planning.
  • Strategic Resource Allocation: Insights for aligning resources with business goals.
  • Efficient Infrastructure Management: Support for cost management strategies across deployments.

Azure Cost Management is widely implemented in industries seeking to monitor and control budgets, optimize costs, and track resource spending. Companies utilize it to gain billing insights, understand usage patterns, and minimize cloud expenses. It is instrumental in managing infrastructure costs and supporting cost management strategies across different deployments, making it valuable for projecting profitability and setting cost alerts.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Hess, Expedia, Kelloggs, Philips, HyperTrack
Quixey, Infomedia, Panaya, Wix.com, Mirabeau, Mi9, GetTaxi, Outsmart Studios, Bownty, BlazeMeter: The Load Testing Cloud, Irdeto, Effective Measure, Totango, Nextdoor, BranchOut, The BioTeam, Evolven, Netotiate, ClickSoftware
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Cost Management
September 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.