Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Cost Management vs IBM Turbonomic comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while IBM is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 9.5% mindshare in CCM, compared to IBM’s 14.2% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Azure Cost Management
Read 44 Azure Cost Management reviews
  • 1,376 Views
  • 1,210 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
IBM Turbonomic
Read 205 IBM Turbonomic reviews
  • 3,037 Views
  • 1,436 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Azure Cost Management and IBM Turbonomic are key players in the cloud management category. While both have their strengths, Azure Cost Management seems to have the upper hand in cost analysis and user integration within the Azure platform. Conversely, IBM Turbonomic excels in automation and performance optimization.

Features: Azure Cost Management offers cost analysis, real-time consumption insights, and seamless integration with other Azure services. These features make it ideal for companies looking to forecast and reduce their cloud expenses. IBM Turbonomic offers automation, real-time monitoring, and dynamic resource management, which are essential for performance optimization and workload prediction.

Room for Improvement: Azure Cost Management users desire better reporting, dashboard flexibility, and improved integration with other cloud platforms. Enhancements in automatic reporting and scalability are also sought. IBM Turbonomic could benefit from a more refined interface, detailed reporting, and enhanced integration with third-party monitoring tools, alongside needing broader cloud services support and automation features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Cost Management is widely used in the public cloud and praised for its comprehensive documentation, though technical support can be slow. It is a cost-effective component of the Azure suite. IBM Turbonomic is primarily used on-premises with a focus on private clouds, offering excellent documentation and customization but facing some integration and UI challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Cost Management is bundled with Azure subscriptions, offering good ROI by optimizing cloud resource costs without licensing fees. IBM Turbonomic, despite its higher cost, delivers significant ROI for larger enterprises by optimizing resources and reducing hardware costs, using flexible pricing models for dynamic resource investments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Cost Management vs. IBM Turbonomic Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Cost Management vs. IBM Turbonomic
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 838,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Azure Cost Management reduces infrastructure maintenance time and costs, enhancing ROI through improved governance and efficient expense management.
Sentiment score
7.2
IBM Turbonomic offers quick ROI by reducing hardware costs, optimizing resources, and decreasing operational expenses through automation and efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Azure Cost Management support is generally praised for responsiveness, though some users note delays and focus on sales.
Sentiment score
8.9
IBM Turbonomic's customer service is highly rated for its responsiveness, knowledge, and effectiveness, despite some mixed post-acquisition experiences.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Azure Cost Management is scalable, compatible with Azure services, supporting diverse sizes, but features and automation need enhancement.
Sentiment score
6.9
IBM Turbonomic is scalable, seamlessly integrating with various environments while its licensing supports expansion, focusing on additional requirements.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Azure Cost Management is highly reliable and stable, with minor issues swiftly resolved by effective technical support.
Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Turbonomic is praised for stability and robust performance, with minor update issues swiftly resolved by support.
 

Room For Improvement

Azure Cost Management improves integration, insights, automation, scalability, and customization while enhancing dashboards, interfaces, pricing, and support.
IBM Turbonomic needs an improved interface, better reporting, clearer documentation, more integrations, and a stable, mobile-compatible platform.
 

Setup Cost

Azure Cost Management is free with a subscription, generally cost-effective, aligning with pay-as-you-go, ideal for enterprises.
IBM Turbonomic offers flexible, competitive pricing models, providing value through resource optimization and reducing hardware expenses effectively.
 

Valuable Features

Azure Cost Management optimizes spending with real-time visibility, cost-saving insights, and user-friendly analytics for efficient budgeting.
IBM Turbonomic enhances efficiency through automation, capacity management, reporting, and planning, optimizing resource allocation and infrastructure decisions.
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Cost Management
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Turbonomic
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (5th), Cloud Management (4th), Virtualization Management Tools (2nd), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Analytics (1st), AIOps (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Azure Cost Management is 9.5%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 14.2%, up from 14.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Joy Maitra - PeerSpot reviewer
Continuous monitoring and predictive analytics help provide insights into utilization
Continuous monitoring helps me detect anomalies in the pipeline, preplan resource scalability, and assist with cost management by offering good visibility into resource utilization. It also offers predictive analytics and some existing features, including dashboards. The AI prediction feature helps forecast based on current utilization trends and suggests improvements like the GenAI feature for interactive inquiries.
Read full review
Keldric Emery - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time and costs while reducing performance degradation
It's been a very good solution. The reporting has been very, very valuable as, with a very large environment, it's very hard to get your hands on the environment. Turbonomic does that work for you and really shows you where some of the cost savings can be done. It also helps you with the reporting side. Me being able to see that this machine hasn't been used for a very long time, or seeing that a machine is overused and that it might need more RAM or CPU, et cetera, helps me understand my infrastructure. The cost savings are drastic in the cloud feature in Azure and in AWS. In some of those other areas, I'm able to see what we're using, what we're not using, and how we can change to better fit what we have. It gives us the ability for applications and teams to see the hardware and how it's being used versus how they've been told it's being used. The reporting really helps with that. It shows which application is really using how many resources or the least amount of resources. Some of the gaps between an infrastructure person like myself and an application are filled. It allows us to come to terms by seeing the raw data. This aspect is very important. In the past, it was me saying "I don't think that this application is using that many resources" or "I think this needs more resources." I now have concrete evidence as well as reporting and some different analytics that I can show. It gives me the evidence that I would need to show my application owners proof of what I'm talking about. In terms of the downtime, meantime, and resolution that Turbonomic has been able to show in reports, it has given me an idea of things before things happen. That is important as I would really like to see a machine that needs resources, and get resources to it before we have a problem where we have contention and aspects of that nature. It's been helpful in that regard. Turbonomic has helped us understand where performance risks exist. Turbonomic looks at my environment and at the servers and even at the different hosts and how they're handling traffic and the number of machines that are on them. I can analyze it and it can show me which server or which host needs resources, CPU, or RAM. Even in Azure, in the cloud, I'm able to see which resources are not being used to full capacity and understand where I could scale down some in order to save cost. It is very, very helpful in assessing performance risk by navigating underlying causes and actions. The reason why it's helpful is because if there's a machine that's overrunning the CPU, I can run reports every week to get an idea of machines that would need CPU, RAM, or additional resources. Those resources could be added by Turbonomic - not so much by me - on a scheduled basis. I personally don't have to do it. It actually gives me a little bit of my life back. It helps me to get resources added without me physically having to touch each and every resource myself. Turbonomic has helped to reduce performance degradation in the same way as it's able to see the resources and see what it needs and add them before a problem occurs. It follows the trends. It sees the trends of what's happening and it's able to add or take away those resources. For example, we discuss when we need to do certain disaster recovery tests. Over the years, Turbo will be able to see, for example, around this time of year that certain people ramp up certain resources in an environment, and then it will add the resources as required. Another time of year, it will realize these resources are not being used as much, and it takes those resources away. In this way, it saves money and time while letting us know where we are. We've saved a great deal of time using this product when I consider how I'd have to multiply myself and people like me who would have to add resources to devices or take resources away. We've saved hundreds of hours. Most of the time those hours would have to be after hours as well, which are more valuable to me as that's my personal time. Those saved hours are across months, not years. I would consider the number of resources that Turbonomic is adding and taking away and the placement (if I had to do it all myself) would end up being hundreds of hours monthly that would be added without the help of Turbonomic. It helps us to meet SLAs mainly due to the fact that we're able to keep the servers going and to keep the servers in an environment, to keep them to where (if we need to add resources) we can add them at any given time. It will keep our SLAs where they need to be. If we were to have downtime due to the fact that we had to add resources or take resources away and it was an emergency, then that would prevent us from meeting our SLAs. We also use it to monitor Azure and to monitor our machines in terms of the resources that are out there and the cost involved. In a lot of cases, it does a better job of giving us cost information than Azure itself does. We're able to see the cost per machine. We're able to see the unattached volume and storage that we are paying for. It gives us a great level of insight. Turbonomic gives us the time to be able to focus on innovation and ongoing modernization. Some of the tasks that it does are tasks that I would not necessarily have to do. It's very helpful in that I know that the resources are there where they need to be and it gives me an idea of what changes need to be made or what suggestions it's making. Even if I don't take them, I'm able to get a good idea of some best practices through Turbonomic. One of the ways that Turbonomic does to help bring new resources to market is that we are now able to see the resources (or at least monitor the resources) before they get out to the general public within our environment. We saw immediate value from the product in the test environment. We set it up in a small test environment and we started with just placement and we could tell that the placement was being handled more efficiently than what VMware was doing. There was value for us in placement alone. Then, after we left the placement, we began to look at the resources and there were resources. We immediately began to see a change in the environment. It has made the application and performance better, mainly due to the fact that we are able to give resources and take resources away based on what the need is. Our expenses, definitely, have been in a better place based on the savings that we've been able to make in the cloud and on-prem. Turbonomic has been very helpful in that regard. We've been able to see the savings easily based on the reports in Turbonomic. That, and just seeing the machines that are not being used to capacity allows us to set everything up so it runs a bit more efficiently.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Cost Management?
Gives visibility into the cost of cloud-based solutions.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Cost Management?
The pricing is cost-effective, and I have not encountered any extra expenses attached after purchasing the service.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Cost Management?
Azure Cost Management is a little complicated, and the learning curve is somewhat steep. An enhancement recommendation I have would be to provide more real-time updates about costs.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is set as a percentage of the consumption of some of our customers' services. The ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
The implementation could be enhanced.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting. This helps us get a consolidated view of all customer spending into a single d...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cloudability vs Azure Cost Management Logo
Cloudability vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 23% of the time
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Azure Cost Management Logo
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 13% of the time
Zabbix vs Azure Cost Management Logo
Zabbix vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon CloudWatch vs Azure Cost Management Logo
Amazon CloudWatch vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 6% of the time
Datadog vs Azure Cost Management Logo
Datadog vs Azure Cost Management
Compared 4% of the time
More Azure Cost Management Competitors
VMware Aria Operations vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
VMware Aria Operations vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 19% of the time
VMware vSphere vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
VMware vSphere vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 8% of the time
Cloudability vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
Cloudability vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 7% of the time
Cisco Intersight vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
Cisco Intersight vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 7% of the time
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs IBM Turbonomic Logo
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs IBM Turbonomic
Compared 6% of the time
More IBM Turbonomic Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Cost Management
February 2025
Azure Cost Management reportDownload Azure Cost Management product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Turbonomic
February 2025
IBM Turbonomic reportDownload IBM Turbonomic product report
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Cost Management, Cloudyn
Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Microsoft
IBM
 

Overview

Azure Cost Management provides actionable insights for IT professionals to optimize cloud expenses and align budgets with strategic goals. It features real-time visibility and analytics for efficient resource management.

Azure Cost Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools for cost analysis and control, including budgeting alerts and integration capabilities to optimize resource spending. Its intuitive interface simplifies navigation while providing trend analysis, forecasting, and cost-saving recommendations. By delivering detailed insights into resource usage, Azure helps organizations manage expenses effectively, enabling strategic financial planning through clear visualizations and reports.

What are the key features of Azure Cost Management?
  • Customizable Cost Analysis: Tailored insights to analyze expenses effectively.
  • Real-Time Consumption Visibility: Immediate data access for informed decision-making.
  • Budgeting Alerts: Set alerts to monitor and control spending.
  • Advisor Recommendations: Integrated advice for cost optimization.
  • Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with various platforms.
  • Trend Analysis and Forecasting: Tools to predict future costs and trends.
What benefits should be expected when using Azure Cost Management?
  • Expense Optimization: Streamlined processes for managing cloud costs.
  • Enhanced Budget Management: Precise control over budget allocations.
  • Improved Financial Insights: Clear reporting for better financial planning.
  • Strategic Resource Allocation: Insights for aligning resources with business goals.
  • Efficient Infrastructure Management: Support for cost management strategies across deployments.

Azure Cost Management is widely implemented in industries seeking to monitor and control budgets, optimize costs, and track resource spending. Companies utilize it to gain billing insights, understand usage patterns, and minimize cloud expenses. It is instrumental in managing infrastructure costs and supporting cost management strategies across different deployments, making it valuable for projecting profitability and setting cost alerts.

Microsoft

IBM Turbonomic offers automation, planning, and right-sizing recommendations to streamline resource management, improve efficiencies, and optimize costs across virtualized environments and cloud platforms.

IBM Turbonomic is valued for its capability to optimize resource allocation and monitor virtual environments efficiently. It facilitates automated decision-making in VM sizing, load balancing, and cost optimization for both on-premises and cloud deployments. Users can leverage insights for workload placement, ensure peak performance assurance, and effectively right-size across VMware and Azure. The ongoing transition to HTML5 aims to improve visual and navigational ease, while expanded reporting features are anticipated. Opportunities for improved training, documentation, and integrations enhance platform usability and functionality.

What Are the Key Features?
  • Automation: Streamlines resource allocation and VM management.
  • Planning Tools: Supports capacity management and growth projections.
  • Right-Sizing: Optimizes VM configurations for efficient resource use.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Provides quick insights into environment health.
  • Reporting Capabilities: Offers valuable data for informed decision-making.
  • Cloud Integration: Ensures cost-effective resource utilization.
What Benefits Should Be Looked For?
  • Performance Enhancement: Improves application performance efficiency.
  • Cost Reduction: Minimizes operational expenses through optimizations.
  • Infrastructure Efficiency: Maximizes use of IT infrastructure resources.

In finance, IBM Turbonomic aids in maintaining platform efficiency during market fluctuations. Healthcare organizations leverage its capability for resource optimization during high-demand periods to enhance patient care support. Retailers use it for planning in peak seasons, ensuring resources align with fluctuating demand to maintain performance continuity.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Quixey, Infomedia, Panaya, Wix.com, Mirabeau, Mi9, GetTaxi, Outsmart Studios, Bownty, BlazeMeter: The Load Testing Cloud, Irdeto, Effective Measure, Totango, Nextdoor, BranchOut, The BioTeam, Evolven, Netotiate, ClickSoftware
IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
Buyer's Guide
Azure Cost Management vs. IBM Turbonomic
January 2025
Free Report: Azure Cost Management vs. IBM Turbonomic
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Cost Management vs. IBM Turbonomic and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Cost Management vs. IBM Turbonomic report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.