AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Additionally, 75% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] and SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Progress Software, Fortra and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).

To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Featured Reviews

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Beneficial quick protocol, powerful, but limited use cases

Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand. The best way to propose a suite is to have an integrated suite where the customer could choose to license part of it. This solution could be one solution not two choices between 10 or 12 different solutions. The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is the communication protocol, which is fast. There are a lot of different clients that are offering features related to these fast protocols. It's possible to create one unique suite that can handle this base protocol. It will be quite easy to propose to the customers.

Read full review

Kyle Titus

Chief Technology Officer at Revio

Always works, handles all types of load, and allows us to have S3 files as storage

Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops. There could be client software that you use to connect to the server. Generally, AWS doesn't provide one for you, so you have to use either your CLI, maybe your SSH CLI, or use some kind of desktop solution. I had to find a desktop app from a third party to run this. Our clients also do the same everywhere else, so it would be nice if the SFTP Gateway solution came with a client that anyone could download on their Mac, Windows, or any other machine.

Read full review

reviewer2292672

Lead Analyst at a integrator with 51-200 employees

The solution can be used for internal file transfer, but its technical support and third-party integrations should be improved

I am comparing SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, WS_FTP, and Wing FTP for my current company. We use the solution for multiple purposes, and it should be user-friendly when integrating something. We cannot always depend on the support team to come and fix the issues. Overall, I rate SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is that it's an incredibly fast protocol, you can use all the bandwidth available. If I need to send large amounts of data this is the fastest protocol on the market. I have been using it for some minor projects and it is very powerful."

"Good user interface and ability to set up multiple file transfer jobs."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time."

"The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization."

"Being able to have the S3 files as storage is most valuable. We can use S3 as storage instead of an SFTP server or a machine."

"The solution offers good data recovery."

"We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer."

Cons

"The solution's pricing is high and should be reduced."

"Deployment is complex and it was difficult to get support."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand."

"The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled."

"Could be more automated, particularly for file transfers."

"Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops."

"The solution’s technical support should be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is not an inexpensive solution. I am not aware of many competitors to determine how affordable the price is overall."

"It's $249 per month per instance. It's not great; it's pretty pricey. We've got multiple users on that one instance. If we had to build it by hand, we would win on cost there, but obviously, there is effort and time. In terms of the additional costs, they do have some specific pricing, but for our use case, we don't end up going over $249. They do specify in their pricing what they're charging for."

"The pricing of the solution is INR 3,00,000."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Media Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aspera Managed File Transfer?

Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites wi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aspera Managed File Transfer?

The solution's pricing calculation needs revision to be more competitive

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Aspera Managed File Transfer?

Aspera Managed File Transfer has superior technology. Overall, I rate Aspera Managed File Transfer a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Transfer for SFTP?

The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Transfer for SFTP?

The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP g...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Transfer for SFTP?

We have integrations with third-party systems that unfortunately make use of a very old-school, file-based protocol. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?

We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?

The pricing of the solution is INR 3,00,000. The pricing of the solution should come down.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?

The solution’s technical support should be improved. The solution's initial setup and third-party integrations could ...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 72% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 14% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 8% of the time

Fortra's Globalscape WAFS vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 6% of the time

More Aspera Managed File Transfer Competitors

Kiteworks vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 46% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

MOVEit vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

CA XCOM Data Transport vs AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Competitors

MOVEit vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server

Compared 100% of the time

More SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2024

Download Aspera Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2024

Download AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2024

SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server report

Download SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server

Learn More

IBM

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SolarWinds

Overview

IBM Aspera takes a different approach to tackling the challenges of big data movement over global WANs. Rather than optimize or accelerate data transfer, Aspera eliminates underlying bottlenecks by using its proprietary fasp technology that fully utilizes available network bandwidth to maximize speed and quickly scale up with no theoretical limit. Using fasp, transfers are secure end-to-end and are largely unaffected by file size, transfer distance, or network conditions, making transfer times up to 100Xs faster than TCP-based protocols.

IBM Aspera offers SaaS, on-prem, and hybrid solutions to meet the needs of modernizing infrastructures. All solutions offer robust security and compliance, intuitive file sharing, workflow automation, central administration, and real-time visibility. Quickly and easily initiate transfers across hybrid infrastructures, including support for cloud-to-cloud transfers. IBM Aspera offers unmatched transfer speeds, end-to-end security, reliability, and exceptional bandwidth control.

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) - Remote File Sharing | SolarWinds SolarWinds logo Government Customer... logo Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server Enhance security and control over... “Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is a versatile, easy-to-deploy solution that integrates well into... Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is an excellent and cost-effective solution.

Sample Customers

Gwinnett County Public Schools, Evonik, Voith, BITMARCK, Oracle

Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Progress Software, Fortra and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.