Axiad Conductor vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance comparison

Axiad and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Axiad is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0, while Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.4. Axiad holds a 0.3% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axiad users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Axiad Conductor

Read 6 Axiad Conductor reviews

425 Views
92 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Read 8 Microsoft Entra ID Governance reviews

359 Views
179 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axiad Conductor

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 16, 2025

Axiad Conductor and Microsoft Entra ID Governance are identity management solutions. Axiad Conductor has the advantage in ease of deployment and pricing, while Microsoft Entra ID Governance leads in feature comprehensiveness.

Features: Axiad Conductor offers flexible authentication management, robust multi-factor authentication options, and strong integration capabilities. Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides advanced identity governance with access lifecycle management, role management tools, and user behavior analytics.

Room for Improvement: Axiad Conductor could enhance its identity governance features and expand access reviews and role management functionalities. Further improvements in user behavior analytics would be beneficial. Microsoft Entra ID Governance could streamline its deployment process, simplify multi-factor authentication user activation, and enhance the integration experience with non-Microsoft systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axiad Conductor is known for straightforward deployment with responsive customer service, enabling quicker operational readiness. Microsoft Entra ID Governance involves a more complex setup due to its broader features but benefits from Microsoft's extensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Axiad Conductor offers competitive pricing appealing to cost-conscious users, ensuring a solid return on investment through efficient authentication solutions. Microsoft Entra ID Governance, higher in cost, justifies its pricing with extensive feature offerings promising substantial organizational benefits and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Axiad Conductor vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axiad Conductor

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

14th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (12th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (15th), Passwordless Authentication (4th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (5th)

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Axiad Conductor is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is 1.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Eric Brown

Cybersecurity Director - Enterprise Identity & Access Management at SAIC

The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform

The most valuable feature is the overhead management of the platform. There is less for my team to worry about. The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform. We just consume the service and work with them to refine it, making it even more valuable. Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization. One of our requirements to continue some of our contracts is to have multi-factor authentication across all devices accessing the network. It is extremely easy to enroll a user with “One Click Issuance”. I have had very few calls to the service desk regarding enrollment. It takes a couple of minutes to enroll a user with "One Click Issuance". Deploying and managing authenticators is very easy, either done by a mobile application or enrollment of an OTP token. It is very simple. This is important to my userbase, which makes it important to me. Functionality-wise, it is pretty solid.

Read full review

William Kox

Azure Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Great policies and timelines for streamlined compliance

There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs. I cannot directly perform some tasks from the portal. First, I have to go to the policy, change it, and then return to the package to add it. I cannot do it directly from the package. Workarounds are needed, so that can be improved. At the moment, that is the only issue we are facing that needs enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very user-friendly. We're issuing YubiKeys for our corporate users and they just plug it in, go to the Axiad Cloud portal, and click the issue button. It's a couple of steps."

"And when it comes to enrolling a user, it's super easy with One Click Issuance... It's so easy now that we can offload the process to our clients who can self-enroll. Previously, we would have to do the enrollment process because it was so complicated."

"Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization."

"What I have found most valuable is the overall way Axiad listened to our problems and helped us solve them. They provided guidance and expertise, with their experience, that enabled us to be successful in a very challenging space."

"The life cycle management of credentials is the aspect that we have found to be the most useful... The differentiator that Axiad provided was the ability to provide users a way to self-serve the updating of their credentials on their private keys. That was the feature we were most interested in and Axiad does an excellent job of it."

"The solution has also saved us time by having end-users troubleshoot issues through the MyCircle feature, and has definitely reduced the efforts of our administrators. It is saving us five to 10 minutes per incident."

"It is compliant with our RVRT and CSV guidelines."

"The solution gives me the capability to automatically move guest accounts from the tenant without any manual intervention."

"The most valuable features are multifactor authentication and account creation for the Exchange environment in Office 365."

"The platform's most valuable feature is the single sign-on service."

"The product's most valuable features are the robust audit trail capabilities."

"I am very happy with the solution."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance for identity management is multi-factor authentication."

"Access reviews are an essential feature of Entra Governance. Additionally, privileged identity management is one of its most valuable features. Just-in-time access, or Jet GIT, is integral to this system. Moreover, user behavior analytics stands out as one of its top features."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance pros

Cons

"macOS is notoriously ever-evolving and it's difficult to keep pace with it as it pertains to certain kinds of crypto authentication. That's really not even on Axiad. That's a decision by Apple, but it makes it a moving target."

"I would like a more modern look to the portal."

"With their licensing model, it becomes hard to scale. For example, we couldn't roll it out enterprise-wide because if you scale it across more than 100,000 users, the cost becomes too exorbitant."

"We would prefer that the solution be hosted in Canada because we're a Canadian entity. That would be nice to have. It's not a feature, as such, but it would really make us a lot happier if it could be located in Canada."

"There are just some minor tweaks that could be made on the front end. It would be cool to have nicknames for authenticator devices. If you have more than one, it's hard to discern what you have."

"I'm looking forward to seeing how they move to FIDO U2F as their primary authentication method across all of their solutions."

"Bridging between on-premises and cloud services has the potential for improvement. For instance, it would be beneficial to be able to synchronize traditional directory schemas with Azure. I need to maintain an on-premises Active Directory server for certain required services."

"There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs."

"The solution lacks the feature to work well with third-party applications."

"Microsoft Entra ID Governance should improve its capability to manage identities and access from a single console."

"The platform's configuration process needs improvement."

"One area for improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Governance could be providing more granular control over security policies."

"Microsoft has done a commendable job with RPAX. However, Microsoft should prioritize enhancing its ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) capabilities. Currently, Microsoft's ABAC offering falls behind AWS in comparison."

"Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axiad's pricing was what we were expecting. It was at the right spot. They were competitive."

"Don't just focus on the hardware or software costs of acquiring a solution, but look at it from the perspective that so much of what it takes to run a PKI environment has to do with the people who are running it.... look at the total cost of ownership and not just the cost of acquisition."

"It's very cheap on a per-year basis. The cards themselves last about three years and the license is on the order of double-digit dollars per user, and not hundreds of dollars per user, per year."

"The pricing is very competitive for what is offered at the level that we need. They are right there with what the industry standards are. They tend to be a little bit less, in terms of cost, when we are talking about security at government standards. So, I would say that they have a slight advantage on cost compared to the industry average. They are the lower cost solution and the best bargain out on the market today."

"The solution's pricing is not low but reasonable."

"There are no additional costs besides the standard licensing fees."

"In the education sector where I work, the annual cost for my Google and Microsoft environments is approximately $35,000. This covers the needs of 3,400 students and 800 faculty and staff members."

"While other products give the pricing for their application, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has a per-user-based license model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axiad Cloud?

The life cycle management of credentials is the aspect that we have found to be the most useful... The differentiator that Axiad provided was the ability to provide users a way to self-serve the up...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axiad Cloud?

Our use case is credential management for one of the business units. Axiad provides credential management for those users, including the creation of new credentials and life cycle management of the...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Axiad Cloud?

You have to understand the number of users and the number of devices that are going to use the solution. I'm saying that because of my experience with the licensing part. That's my one gripe. If yo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

We use it throughout the company. My colleagues and I are utilizing it, and we are creating access packages and so forth. We are using it for the entire company to manage access.

See all answers

Comparisons

Venafi vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 41% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 31% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 29% of the time

More Axiad Conductor Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 75% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 16% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 10% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor

April 2025

Download Axiad Conductor product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

March 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID Governance product report

Also Known As

Axiad Cloud

No data available

Overview

Axiad Conductor offers a user-friendly platform for managing multifactor authentication and credential lifecycle, supporting seamless transitions to cloud environments for enhanced security compliance and access control.

Axiad Conductor stands out with intuitive management of multifactor authentication systems, assertive device lifecycle management, and a managed cloud solution that streamlines operations. It promotes user self-service for credential updates, minimizing the need for extensive training. With the capability to handle large networks, it enhances efficiency while meeting contract demands. Addressing user suggestions, plans include interface design updates and Canadian hosting, although macOS's frequent updates pose integration challenges.

What are the principal features of Axiad Conductor?

"One Click Issuance": Simplifies user enrollment through easy interface actions.
Multifactor Authentication: Manages critical authentication processes securely.
PKI Support: Facilitates seamless management in PKI environments.
Credential Self-Service: Empowers users to handle updates independently.
Cloud Management: Reduces operational burdens due to its managed environment.

What should users look for in terms of ROI and benefits?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations boost productivity across large networks.
Flexibility: Adaptability to meet evolving challenges and contract requirements.
User Empowerment: Enables users to manage their credentials autonomously.
Compliance: Supports regulation adherence effortlessly.

In diverse industries, Axiad Conductor is implemented to manage multifactor authentication and PKI elements like smart cards and YubiKeys. Organizations leverage it to ensure compliance, facilitate secure workforce access, and transition PKI systems to the cloud, handling substantial volumes of smart card and machine certificates with ease.

Axiad

Microsoft Entra ID Governance empowers organizations with advanced identity management, security enforcement, and seamless access management across environments, offering robust multi-factor authentication and audit capabilities.

Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides comprehensive identity and security management through features like single sign-on and privileged identity management. It enhances user management with user behavior analytics, entitlement management, and access reviews while integrating on-premises solutions with cloud services like Office 365. By ensuring secure access and resource protection within Azure, organizations manage access, automate user access rules, and govern external identities effectively.

What features make Microsoft Entra ID Governance stand out?

Audit Trail Capabilities: Thorough tracking for security compliance.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhanced protection across platforms.
Single Sign-On: Efficient management across different systems.
Privileged Identity Management: Control just-in-time access with analytics.
Entitlement Management: Automate guest account management.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Enhanced Security: Strong authentication and auditing for secure environments.
Efficient User Management: Streamlined access processes through SSO.
Unified Identity Solutions: Integration with cloud and on-premises platforms.
Automated Access Rules: Reduced manual oversight with automation.

Financial services utilize Microsoft Entra ID Governance to protect sensitive data while automating user access rules and managing compliance. In education, it facilitates user account management and access provisioning for students and faculty, ensuring secure collaboration through Exchange and Teams.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

March 2025

Free Report: Axiad Conductor vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Axiad Conductor vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axiad Conductor vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.