Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Axiad Conductor vs Thales Authenticators comparison

Axiad and Thales Cloud Security are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Axiad is ranked #12 with an average rating of 10.0, while Thales Cloud Security is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Axiad holds a 0.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Thales Cloud Security’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axiad users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales Cloud Security users who would recommend it.
Axiad Conductor
Read 6 Axiad Conductor reviews
  • 689 Views
  • 148 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Thales Authenticators
Read 6 Thales Authenticators reviews
  • 1,075 Views
  • 924 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 16, 2025

Thales Authenticators and Axiad Conductor compete in the identity and access management sector. Thales Authenticators excels in security features, while Axiad Conductor shines for its comprehensive and adaptive capabilities, making it valuable despite its higher cost.

Features: Thales Authenticators provides secure identity verification, biometric authentication, and off-site token capability allowing secure access even without internet connectivity. Axiad Conductor supports a versatile authentication platform, multi-factor management, and strong device lifecycle management, offering seamless integration across enterprise systems.

Room for Improvement: Thales Authenticators could enhance its adaptability and compatibility with more integration options. It might benefit from a broader range of managed services and additional user-friendly features to improve deployment. Axiad Conductor could address its high initial costs and further streamline the user credential deployment process. It may improve in providing more localized support and further customization for specific enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Thales Authenticators offers a straightforward deployment with robust support for quick implementations, focusing on security. Axiad Conductor supports a flexible deployment model and extensive customer service, tailoring its approach for various environments ensuring adaptability and user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Thales Authenticators is cost-effective for security-focused enterprises, providing a moderate setup cost with considerable ROI. Axiad Conductor, though requiring higher upfront investment, justifies it with extensive feature sets for long-term ROI through flexibility and comprehensive security solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Axiad Conductor
Ranking in Authentication Systems
12th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM) (15th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (14th), Passwordless Authentication (4th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (5th)
Thales Authenticators
Ranking in Authentication Systems
17th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Axiad Conductor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales Authenticators is 2.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

Eric Brown - PeerSpot reviewer
The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform
The most valuable feature is the overhead management of the platform. There is less for my team to worry about. The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform. We just consume the service and work with them to refine it, making it even more valuable. Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization. One of our requirements to continue some of our contracts is to have multi-factor authentication across all devices accessing the network. It is extremely easy to enroll a user with “One Click Issuance”. I have had very few calls to the service desk regarding enrollment. It takes a couple of minutes to enroll a user with "One Click Issuance". Deploying and managing authenticators is very easy, either done by a mobile application or enrollment of an OTP token. It is very simple. This is important to my userbase, which makes it important to me. Functionality-wise, it is pretty solid.
Read full review
Gustavo Merighi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an easy-to-use management interface and a straightforward initial setup process
Our primary use cases include multifactor authentication for VPN connections and access to security tools like jump servers and firewalls. We also use it to enhance security measures in an enterprise environment The most valuable feature is the YAML 2.0 integration. It has an easy-to-use…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The life cycle management of credentials is the aspect that we have found to be the most useful... The differentiator that Axiad provided was the ability to provide users a way to self-serve the updating of their credentials on their private keys. That was the feature we were most interested in and Axiad does an excellent job of it."
"Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization."
"And when it comes to enrolling a user, it's super easy with One Click Issuance... It's so easy now that we can offload the process to our clients who can self-enroll. Previously, we would have to do the enrollment process because it was so complicated."
"It's very user-friendly. We're issuing YubiKeys for our corporate users and they just plug it in, go to the Axiad Cloud portal, and click the issue button. It's a couple of steps."
"The solution has also saved us time by having end-users troubleshoot issues through the MyCircle feature, and has definitely reduced the efforts of our administrators. It is saving us five to 10 minutes per incident."
"What I have found most valuable is the overall way Axiad listened to our problems and helped us solve them. They provided guidance and expertise, with their experience, that enabled us to be successful in a very challenging space."
"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."
"Scalable and stable."
"One valuable feature is Thales' ability to provide off-site tokens."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"The technical support services are good."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
 

Cons

"There are just some minor tweaks that could be made on the front end. It would be cool to have nicknames for authenticator devices. If you have more than one, it's hard to discern what you have."
"We would prefer that the solution be hosted in Canada because we're a Canadian entity. That would be nice to have. It's not a feature, as such, but it would really make us a lot happier if it could be located in Canada."
"With their licensing model, it becomes hard to scale. For example, we couldn't roll it out enterprise-wide because if you scale it across more than 100,000 users, the cost becomes too exorbitant."
"macOS is notoriously ever-evolving and it's difficult to keep pace with it as it pertains to certain kinds of crypto authentication. That's really not even on Axiad. That's a decision by Apple, but it makes it a moving target."
"I'm looking forward to seeing how they move to FIDO U2F as their primary authentication method across all of their solutions."
"I would like a more modern look to the portal."
"The stability could improve."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."
"The product could be improved by adding more features for sending tokens via SMS or phone calls."
"We faced issues due to slow ticket responses, which improved over time."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Don't just focus on the hardware or software costs of acquiring a solution, but look at it from the perspective that so much of what it takes to run a PKI environment has to do with the people who are running it.... look at the total cost of ownership and not just the cost of acquisition."
"The pricing is very competitive for what is offered at the level that we need. They are right there with what the industry standards are. They tend to be a little bit less, in terms of cost, when we are talking about security at government standards. So, I would say that they have a slight advantage on cost compared to the industry average. They are the lower cost solution and the best bargain out on the market today."
"Axiad's pricing was what we were expecting. It was at the right spot. They were competitive."
"It's very cheap on a per-year basis. The cards themselves last about three years and the license is on the order of double-digit dollars per user, and not hundreds of dollars per user, per year."
"Thales is more expensive than its competitors."
"There is an annual licensing fee."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Government
12%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axiad Cloud?
The life cycle management of credentials is the aspect that we have found to be the most useful... The differentiator that Axiad provided was the ability to provide users a way to self-serve the up...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Axiad Cloud?
Our use case is credential management for one of the business units. Axiad provides credential management for those users, including the creation of new credentials and life cycle management of the...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Axiad Cloud?
You have to understand the number of users and the number of devices that are going to use the solution. I'm saying that because of my experience with the licensing part. That's my one gripe. If yo...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Thales Authenticators?
Currently, the solution fulfills our requirements. We are very satisfied with its features, and do not have any specific ideas for improvement right now. Perhaps, in the future, three-factor authen...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Thales Authenticators?
Our employees, whether working on-site or remotely, use Thales Authenticators for two-factor authentication to log in to their laptops or PCs. This is our primary use case.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Thales Authenticators?
From our past years of experience, the solution is very smooth, and we have had a good experience with it. We would definitely recommend Thales to others for its reliability and features. I'd rate ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Venafi vs Axiad Conductor Logo
Venafi vs Axiad Conductor
Compared 41% of the time
Cisco Duo vs Axiad Conductor Logo
Cisco Duo vs Axiad Conductor
Compared 31% of the time
Yubico YubiKey vs Axiad Conductor Logo
Yubico YubiKey vs Axiad Conductor
Compared 29% of the time
More Axiad Conductor Competitors
Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators Logo
Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 30% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales Authenticators Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 14% of the time
Cisco Duo vs Thales Authenticators Logo
Cisco Duo vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 11% of the time
Utimaco SecurityServer vs Thales Authenticators Logo
Utimaco SecurityServer vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 11% of the time
RSA SecurID vs Thales Authenticators Logo
RSA SecurID vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 8% of the time
More Thales Authenticators Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Axiad Conductor
April 2025
Axiad Conductor reportDownload Axiad Conductor product report
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2025
Thales Authenticators reportDownload Thales Authenticators product report
 

Also Known As

Axiad Cloud
Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager
 

Overview

Axiad Conductor offers a user-friendly platform for managing multifactor authentication and credential lifecycle, supporting seamless transitions to cloud environments for enhanced security compliance and access control.

Axiad Conductor stands out with intuitive management of multifactor authentication systems, assertive device lifecycle management, and a managed cloud solution that streamlines operations. It promotes user self-service for credential updates, minimizing the need for extensive training. With the capability to handle large networks, it enhances efficiency while meeting contract demands. Addressing user suggestions, plans include interface design updates and Canadian hosting, although macOS's frequent updates pose integration challenges.

What are the principal features of Axiad Conductor?
  • "One Click Issuance": Simplifies user enrollment through easy interface actions.
  • Multifactor Authentication: Manages critical authentication processes securely.
  • PKI Support: Facilitates seamless management in PKI environments.
  • Credential Self-Service: Empowers users to handle updates independently.
  • Cloud Management: Reduces operational burdens due to its managed environment.
What should users look for in terms of ROI and benefits?
  • Efficiency: Streamlined operations boost productivity across large networks.
  • Flexibility: Adaptability to meet evolving challenges and contract requirements.
  • User Empowerment: Enables users to manage their credentials autonomously.
  • Compliance: Supports regulation adherence effortlessly.

In diverse industries, Axiad Conductor is implemented to manage multifactor authentication and PKI elements like smart cards and YubiKeys. Organizations leverage it to ensure compliance, facilitate secure workforce access, and transition PKI systems to the cloud, handling substantial volumes of smart card and machine certificates with ease.

Axiad

Offering the broadest range of authentication methods and form factors, Thales allows customers to address numerous use cases, assurance levels, and threat vectors with unified, centrally managed policies—managed from one authentication back end delivered in the cloud or on premise.

Thales Cloud Security
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)
Buyer's Guide
Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators
April 2025
Free Report: Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators
Find out what your peers are saying about Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Axiad Conductor vs. Thales Authenticators report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.