Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs IBM API Connect comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Axway holds a 1.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

2,004 Views
1,470 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

Read 76 IBM API Connect reviews

8,910 Views
6,632 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

IBM API Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and Axway AMPLIFY API Management compete in the API management category. IBM API Connect appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive lifecycle management and integration with IBM services.

Features: IBM API Connect offers robust security gateways, GUI-based API development, OAuth support, holistic API management, and integration with IBM products like DataPower Gateway. Axway AMPLIFY API Management is strong in security, handling large data volumes, and providing governance. It efficiently manages APIs across different systems and offers a competitive pricing model.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect could improve integration with Exchange Server, ease of setup, monetization, stability, and documentation. Axway AMPLIFY API Management should aim to enhance scalability, microservices support, usability, installation simplicity, and customer support. IBM's proprietary tools can limit flexibility, whereas Axway focuses on deployment and service improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products provide versatile deployment options: on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud. IBM API Connect receives mixed reviews for customer service, with reports of slow response times. Axway, though having less available data on customer service, offers a streamlined deployment process. IBM's global deployment caters to diverse operational needs, while Axway prioritizes centralized solutions.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect is considered expensive with its complex pricing structure, but its integration capabilities justify the cost for large operations. Axway offers a competitive yearly subscription model with full feature access, attracting budget-conscious users. Both solutions promise ROI, though IBM might deliver a higher return due to its extensive governance and security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM API Connect

Ranking in API Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 6.4%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Sudhanshu Singh

Associate Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

We get stability, scalability, and security

Axway provides good documentation that newcomers can easily follow, but I believe the initial setup would be tough for someone new. Experienced employees know where everything is and how to do their job, so it would be difficult for a new hire to get up to speed. For an experienced person, I give the initial setup a ten out of ten. Deployment can be considered a hundred lines of code and some a thousand lines. For a simple deployment, it takes 10-15 seconds. And if the environment connectivity is good enough to respond and there is some heavy code that is being deployed, it takes around 30-60 seconds max, if we are referring to the cloud, where the connectivity for the long duration of the calls is there. The total deployment time is one minute to finish up. From the industrial point of view, Europe has a major chunk of users followed by, the US, and then Australia or the Asia-Pacific region.

Read full review

KavitaChavan

Associate Manager at Baariz

Quite flexible and provides excellent performance for API gateway

The only disadvantage I can see is that it requires heavy hardware support, which can be considered quite expensive. In terms of new functionality, I think the analytics can be improved in V10. The analytics feature was better in the older version, 2.18. But in V10, it's not as flexible. When exporting analytics as KSP or JSON, it's not well formatted. They can work on enhancing the analytics part. Additionally, they can focus on reducing the hardware cost.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."

"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"This platform can be highly scalable."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

"This product is well integrated with other products. Its ability to interact with IBM Secure Gateway and other integration products is the core feature. Also, the lead time to put it into production is relatively short ."

"The interface is very nice. It makes the solution easy to use and navigate."

"What's best about IBM API Connect is the excellent administration. The development tool that builds the API is also very simple, and user-friendly, and it doesn't consume too much time. Another valuable feature in IBM API Connect is its good reporting feature, particularly for operations, but the most valuable feature of the solution for the customer is security. IBM API Connect provides a DMZ and a security gateway between the external and internal environment, so you can publish your API safely. IBM API Connect can also integrate with any tool or middleware that works on open standards without the need for development or coding, so integration with the solution is easier."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it protects our backend system. We are exposing services to external parties and using this solution to protect the backend system, and to have a navigation in between."

"Its speed and performance are valuable."

"Policy configurations are pretty easy."

"IBM API Connect is a reliable and scalable solution."

"The management of the API and API portal is good."

More IBM API Connect pros

Cons

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

"The portal still has room for improvement."

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."

"Team management capabilities could be improved."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

"The implementation process could benefit from improvements, as it may take some time to become accustomed to the deployment."

"The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side."

"There are some performance issues and issues related to asynchronous APIs."

"In terms of what needs improvement, some of the product documentation could be better."

"The initial setup and installation could be easier."

"The implementation of IBM API Connect is complex, as it's an enterprise solution with many components that require more than one person. It's not a single product that you work on, and this is an area for improvement, but normally, it's good. Having a more structured model for IBM API Connect support is also room for improvement that would help customers better."

"Improving the documentation would be beneficial as it currently presents navigation challenges. Incorporating a step-by-step guide could facilitate the integration or migration of various systems, including databases. The existing documentation only comprises plain text, hence incorporating more interactive instructions could enhance its usefulness."

"It's based on a little bit dated architecture. A lot of evolution has happened after that. It's an evolving field. Kong is a Kubernetes-based platform. Kong runs on Kubernetes, but all the other ones are in microservices. So, there's a lot of improvement that can be done."

More IBM API Connect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"It would be a good idea to bring down the pricing by at least 20 to 30 percent."

"API Connect's license cost could be a little lower. But, unfortunately, there aren't many open-source API gateways. Ideally, some new developers could come up with a minimum-functionality open-source solution."

"We pay for the IBM API Connect monthly. We only need to pay the standard licensing fee."

"The pricing is too expensive with IBM. Sometimes, we prefer to go with an open source or something more lightweight."

"I haven't seen anyone go from on-premise to the cloud. In fact, I am seeing people go from the cloud to on-premise because the costs can quickly grow on the cloud."

"Pricing for IBM API Connect varies, e.g. it could be subscription-based. Deploying it on private cloud also means you have to own most of the software licensing."

"It is expensive when compared to other products in this class. There were no extra fees for add-ons or technical support."

"API Connect was highly expensive for us, but the decision to switch was made before I joined the company. It seems like the company bought it, but they didn't know how to use it. After two years, they decided to reevaluate and conduct some cost estimates."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

18%

Insurance Company

Government

Educational Organization

23%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

The solution has a yearly subscription. The solution’s pricing is competitive. Axway makes a significant impression compared to its peers, especially with a sensitive budget. In many instances, it ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Axway's queuing messages could be enhanced.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

Price depends on many factors like size of the deal, competitive factors, timing, customer profile or where the pricing for API Calls is very competitive comparing to any of the leader players.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side. Scalability is an issue with IBM API Connect, making it an area where improvements are required.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 16% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 26% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs IBM API Connect

Compared 1% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

April 2025

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

April 2025

Download IBM API Connect product report

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

No data available

Overview

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

IBM API Connect facilitates API management and integration in the financial sector. Companies use it to expose, secure, and manage APIs for banking, insurance, and fintech, deploying it on-premises, in the cloud, or as a hybrid solution.

IBM API Connect focuses on creating and monetizing APIs while enabling seamless transactions and integration with third-party services. It is vital for compliance with regulations and enhances external communication among institutions. With deployment options suitable for different environments, it supports centralized gateway management, robust security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management. Users benefit from powerful analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and high performance with capabilities in message transformation and efficient monitoring.

What are the most important features?

Centralized Gateway: Manages all APIs through a single entry point.
Robust Security: Ensures API protection with advanced security measures.
Comprehensive API Lifecycle Management: Covers creation, deployment, and retirement of APIs.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API creation and management tasks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides insights into API usage and performance.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with third-party services and internal systems.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
High Performance: Optimizes API performance and reduces latency.
Message Transformation: Manipulates and formats messages between different systems.
Visualization Tools: Enables clear and detailed views of API usage statistics.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

API Monetization: Generates additional revenue streams from APIs.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Improved External Communication: Facilitates integration and communication among financial institutions.
Technical Support: Benefit from reliable customer support and easy configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: Choose from on-premises, cloud, or hybrid options.

IBM API Connect is extensively implemented in the financial sector, enabling banking, insurance, and fintech services to manage APIs efficiently. Companies use it to ensure secure transactions, integration with third-party services, and compliance with regulatory standards. Its deployment flexibility accommodates different infrastructure needs, making it suitable for a wide range of financial applications.

IBM

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect

April 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. IBM API Connect report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.