Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Monitor vs IBM Instana Observability comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (5th)
IBM Instana Observability
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
49th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 10.0%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Instana Observability is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

IrfanRashid - PeerSpot reviewer
May 23, 2024
Allows for detailed monitoring of applications, including performance metrics and data consumption
At the end of the day, I would say it's a very good product for us because we can monitor how our applications are performing. This is very important for us because it's our own application. We need to know its performance, collect data, visualize, and analyze. We can also improve our product based on the results we see from the monitor. Any issues, we can go into the logs and trace them. We can do tracing as well. There are a lot of features. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. My recommendation: If you use a Microsoft product, for example, if you are developing a product in .NET or other Microsoft products, you can use Azure. It's very scalable and works very well. There are many native applications in Azure Systems that can be utilized. For example, if you develop your backend in .NET and use an SQL database or even MongoDB, you can use Azure because it's a native competitor for Microsoft.
Tomas Kim - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 31, 2024
Not expensive and offers good performance
The most valuable feature of the solution is performance. A one-vendor solution serves as a good feature of the tool. In the IT industry, the IT support team has lots of vendors to contact. DB monitoring is done by one company, while WaaS monitoring is done by another and done by another company, which makes it really complicated for the IT team concerned about the security levels. The tool's main feature is that it is a one-vendor solution. The analysis done by the tool is a good feature. The tool is used as an open-source tool. The tool is growing, and new features are being added to the product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use."
"It is a move-in powerful feature compared to other market-leading tools."
"The tools for logs and metrics are pretty good and easy to use."
"One of the most useful aspects of this solution is the out-of-the-box functionality on all areas, especially on Application Insights, zero instrumentation, and artificial intelligence for event correlation."
"Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis."
"The features that are most valuable are the alerting function and also the logging functionality to analyze certain issues using log analytics"
"It is a robust, stable product."
"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is performance."
"The solution has a one-second resolution, giving you the status of your application within one second."
 

Cons

"Lacks information including details related to where problems lie."
"Azure Monitor's integration with applications could be improved."
"When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible."
"The default interface should be improved."
"Enhancing and reaching a level of detail that facilitates pinpointing and addressing issues at such a refined level within the application and database components would be helpful."
"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."
"They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good."
"The process of implementation needs to be easier."
"The solution should include log management and improve reporting and integration with Cognos."
"The product's initial setup phase is not very easy."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing depends on how much logs it collects."
"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"
"Since we are using the basic set, it is more cost-effective compared to other third-party APM solutions."
"I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."
"My company is okay with the current pricing of the solution."
"The licensing is a monthly fee."
"The Azure Insight is a little bit expensive."
"Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."
"The tool's cost is normal as per the market. The tool is not expensive."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to that of its competitors like Dynatrace."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
What do you like most about Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
It is not just Azure Monitor that my company deals with since we augment it with our own DXC Platform X, which DXC developed for the cloud. DXC Platform X has its own set of tools for the cloud. It...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Instana Observability?
The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to that of its competitors like Dynatrace. In India, the solution costs around INR 1,00,000 per node.
What needs improvement with IBM Instana Observability?
The solution should include log management and improve reporting and integration with Cognos.
What is your primary use case for IBM Instana Observability?
The solution is mainly used for observability and application performance management.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: August 2024.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.